Opposite behaviors of reactive metabolites of tienilic acid and its isomer toward liver proteins: use of specific anti-tienilic acid-protein adduct antibodies and the possible relationship with different hepatotoxic effects of the two compounds.

Tienilic acid (TA) is responsible for an immune-mediated drug-induced hepatitis in humans, while its isomer (TAI) triggers a direct hepatitis in rats. In this study, we describe an immunological approach developed for studying the specificity of the covalent binding of these two compounds. For this purpose, two different coupling strategies were used to obtain TA-carrier protein conjugates. In the first strategy, the drug was linked through its carboxylic acid function to amine residues of carrier proteins (BSA-N-TA and casein-N-TA), while in the second strategy, the thiophene ring of TA was attached to proteins through a short 3-thiopropanoyl linker, the corresponding conjugates (BSA-S-5-TA and betaLG-S-5-TA) thus preferentially presenting the 2, 3-dichlorophenoxyacetic moiety of the drug for antibody recognition. The BSA-S-5-TA conjugate proved to be 30 times more immunogenic than BSA-N-TA. Anti-TA-protein adduct antibodies were obtained after immunization of rabbits with BSA-S-5-TA (1/35000 titer against betaLG-S-5-TA in ELISA). These antibodies strongly recognized the 2, 3-dichlorophenoxyacetic moiety of TA but poorly the part of the drug engaged in the covalent binding with the proteins. This powerful tool was used in immunoblots to compare TA or TAI adduct formation in human liver microsomes as well as on microsomes from yeast expressing human liver cytochrome P450 2C9. TA displayed a highly specific covalent binding focused on P450 2C9 which is the main cytochrome P450 responsible for its hepatic activation in humans. On the contrary, TAI showed a nonspecific alkylation pattern, targeting many proteins upon metabolic activation. Nevertheless, this nonspecific covalent binding could be completely shifted to a thiol trapping agent like GSH. The difference in alkylation patterns for these two compounds is discussed with regard to their distinct toxicities. A relationship between the specific covalent binding of P450 2C9 by TA and the appearance of the highly specific anti-LKM2 autoantibodies (known to specifically recognize P450 2C9) in patients affected with TA-induced hepatitis is strongly suggested.

Antigenic targets in tienilic acid hepatitis. Both cytochrome P450 2C11 and 2C11-tienilic acid adducts are transported to the plasma membrane of rat hepatocytes and recognized by human sera.

Patients with tienilic acid hepatitis exhibit autoantibodies that recognize unalkylated cytochrome P450 2C9 in humans but recognize 2C11 in rats. Our aim was to determine whether the immune reaction is also directed against neoantigens. Rats were treated with tienilic acid and hepatocytes were isolated. Immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and flow cytometry experiments were performed with an anti-tienilic acid or an anti-cytochrome P450 2C11 antibody. Cytochrome P450 2C11 was the main microsomal or plasma membrane protein that was alkylated by tienilic acid. Inhibitors of vesicular transport decreased flow cytometric recognition of both unalkylated and tienilic acid-alkylated cytochrome P450 2C11 on the plasma membrane of cultured hepatocytes. Tienilic acid hepatitis sera that were preadsorbed on microsomes from untreated rats (to remove autoantibodies), poorly recognized untreated hepatocytes in flow cytometry experiments, but better recognized tienilic acid-treated hepatocytes. This recognition was decreased by adsorption with tienilic acid or by preexposure to the anti-tienilic acid or the anti-cytochrome P450 2C11 antibody. We conclude that cytochrome P450 2C11 is alkylated by tienilic acid and follows a vesicular route to the plasma membrane. Tienilic acid hepatitis sera contain antibodies against this tienilic acid adduct, in addition to the previously described anticytochrome P450 autoantibodies.

Immune mechanisms in tienilic acid associated hepatotoxicity.

In order to investigate the mechanisms underlying the hepatotoxicity associated with tienilic acid (Ticrynafen) ingestion we have looked for evidence of sensitisation to drug altered liver cell determinants using an indirect antibody dependent, cell mediated cytotoxicity assay (ADCC). As targets, hepatocytes were isolated from rabbits pretreated with either tienilic acid or its isomer with or without previous enzyme induction with either phenobarbitone or B-naphthoflavone (BNF). Sera from 16 of 36 patients with presumed tienilic acid hepatotoxicity induced significant cytotoxicity to hepatocytes isolated from rabbits pretreated with BNF and subsequently tienilic acid. Three of 10 sera from patients receiving tienilic acid but without overt liver damage also induced significant cytotoxicity to these hepatocytes, however, although none of 20 normal controls or of 16 patients with other liver diseases did so. Non-organ specific autoantibodies, classified as anti-LKM2, were also detectable. These were present in association with tienilic acid associated antibodies: of the 36 patients with presumed tienilic acid hepatotoxicity, 38% had both antibodies, 18% had only anti-LKM2 antibodies and 9% only tienilic acid associated antibodies. These results suggest that this drug reaction is associated with sensitisation to drug altered liver cell antigens and autoantigens. If ticrynafen associated hepatotoxicity is immune mediated, then one possible mechanism is that the drug induced antigens break tolerance, leading to an immune attack on normal liver cell components.