RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been used for the treatment of chronic migraine, but high-quality evidence is scarce. We aimed to evaluate acupuncture's efficacy and safety compared to topiramate for chronic migraine. METHODS: This double-dummy randomized controlled trial included participants aged 18-65 years diagnosed with chronic migraine. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive acupuncture (three sessions/week) plus topiramate placebo (acupuncture group) or topiramate (50-100â mg/day) plus sham acupuncture (topiramate group) over 12 weeks, with the primary outcome being the mean change in monthly migraine days during weeks 1-12. RESULTS: Of 123 screened patients, 60 (mean age 45.8, 81.7% female) were randomly assigned to acupuncture or topiramate groups. Acupuncture demonstrated significantly greater reductions in monthly migraine days than topiramate (weeks 1-12: -2.79 [95% CI: -4.65 to -0.94, p = 0.004]; weeks 13-24: -3.25 [95% CI: -5.57 to -0.92, p = 0.007]). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture may be safe and effective for treating chronic migraine. The efficacy of 12 weeks of acupuncture was sustained for 24 weeks and superior to that of topiramate. Acupuncture can be used as an optional preventive therapy for chronic migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.org Identifier 13563102.
Assuntos
Terapia por Acupuntura , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Topiramato , Humanos , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Doença Crônica , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto Jovem , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Adolescente , IdosoAssuntos
Gabapentina , Ketamina , Topiramato , Humanos , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Gabapentina/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine the correlation of antiseizure medication drug dose estimated from prescription fill records from prescription registers with blood levels during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a Nation-wide study of mothers who gave birth in Denmark between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 using data from Danish Prescription and Laboratory Registers. We identified mothers with blood level measurements of antiseizure medication. The main exposure was estimated antiseizure medication dosage estimated from pregnancy-filled prescriptions in the Danish Prescription Register. The main outcome was the correlation of estimated dose with mean blood level of antiseizure medication in pregnancy. For privacy reasons, the number of blood level measurement and prescription fills were rounded to nearest 10, but proportions reported as exact values. RESULTS: Among 298 560 pregnancies, we identified pregnancies with recorded prescription fill from the prescription register for valproate (N = 90), lamotrigine (N = 1360), levetiracetam (N = 340), topiramate (N = 100), and carbamazepine (N = 60). In these pregnancies, blood level measurements were available in 50 (53%) pregnancies for valproate, 850 (62%) pregnancies for lamotrigine, 320 (93%) pregnancies for levetiracetam, 50 (68%) pregnancies for carbamazepine, and 40 (35%) pregnancies for topiramate. Pearsons's correlation coefficients for the correlation of estimated antiseizure medication dose with mean blood levels were 0.67 (p < 0.0001) for valproate, 0.63 (p < 0.0001) for lamotrigine, 0.63 (p < 0.0001) for levetiracetam, 0.76 (<0.0001) for carbamazepine and 0.89 (<0.0001) for topiramate. CONCLUSIONS: Dose of antiseizure medication estimated from prescription fills was a good proxy for blood levels and thus for biological exposure in pregnancy, suggesting that administrative prescription fill records may be a valuable resource for estimating exposure to antiseizure medication in pregnancy.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/sangue , Gravidez , Dinamarca , Adulto , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/sangue , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Carbamazepina/administração & dosagem , Ácido Valproico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Valproico/sangue , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Lamotrigina/administração & dosagem , Levetiracetam/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common cause of chronic hepatitis in adult and pediatric patients. Adolescents with severe MASLD can demonstrate a more aggressive disease phenotype as they more commonly develop liver fibrosis than BMI matched adults. Therefore, MASLD is the fastest growing indication for liver transplants in young adults. METHODS: Pioglitazone has been shown to improve liver histology in adult patients with MASLD, and in some studies, it attenuated liver fibrosis. Despite its perceived efficacy, pioglitazone is not widely used, likely due to its side effect profile, specifically increased weight gain. Topiramate lowers body weight in adolescents and in combination with phentermine, is one of the few FDA-approved medications for the management of obesity in children over 12 years of age. We performed a retrospective review of the outcomes in pediatric patients with severe MASLD, treated with the combined pioglitazone and topiramate therapy. RESULTS: Here, we report a case series of seven adolescents with severe MASLD and ≥F2 liver fibrosis treated with the combined pioglitazone and topiramate therapy. The combined therapy improved mean serum ALT from 165 ± 80 U/L to 89 ± 62 U/L after 12 months mean duration of treatment. One patient who completed 24 months of the combined therapy demonstrated a decrease in liver stiffness from 8.9 kPa to 5.6 kPa, as assessed by FibroScan elastography. There was a significant increase in body weight during this time, however, body mass index as a percentage of the 95 th percentile adjusted for age and gender did not increase significantly, 151 ± 29% vs. 152 ± 28%. Moreover, waist circumference, mid-upper arm circumference, percent body fat, and muscle mass were not significantly different before and after treatment. Serum lipid levels and hemoglobin A1c also did not change with the treatment. CONCLUSION: In summary, this case series provides encouraging results about the efficacy of the combined pioglitazone and topiramate therapy for the management of adolescents with severe MASLD, which should be further explored in clinical studies.
Assuntos
Quimioterapia Combinada , Pioglitazona , Topiramato , Humanos , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Pioglitazona/uso terapêutico , Pioglitazona/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Criança , Fígado Gorduroso/tratamento farmacológico , Frutose/análogos & derivados , Frutose/uso terapêutico , Frutose/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Índice de Massa CorporalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) versus nonspecific oral migraine preventives (NOEPs). BACKGROUND: Insurers mandate step therapy with NOEPs before approving CGRP mAbs. METHODS: Databases were searched for class I or II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGRP mAbs or NOEPs versus placebo for migraine prevention in adults. The primary outcome measure was monthly migraine days (MMD) or moderate to severe headache days. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs for CGRP mAbs, 5 RCTs for topiramate, and 3 RCTs for divalproex were included in the meta-analysis. There was high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, with weighted mean difference (WMD; 95% confidence interval) of -1.64 (-1.99 to -1.28) MMD, which is compatible with small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25 [-0.34 to -0.16]). Certainty of evidence that topiramate or divalproex is more effective than placebo was very low and low, respectively (WMD -1.45 [-1.52 to -1.38] and -1.65 [-2.30 to -1.00], respectively; Cohen's d -1.25 [-2.47 to -0.03] and -0.48 [-0.67 to -0.29], respectively). Trial sequential analysis showed that information size was adequate and that CGRP mAbs had clear benefit versus placebo. Network meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CGRP mAbs and topiramate (WMD -0.19 [-0.56 to 0.17]) or divalproex (0.01 [-0.73 to 0.75]). No significant difference was seen between topiramate or divalproex (0.21 [-0.45 to 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: There is high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, but the effect size is small. When feasible, CGRP mAbs may be prescribed as first-line preventives; topiramate or divalproex could be as effective but are less well tolerated. The findings of this study support the recently published 2024 position of the American Headache Society on the use of CGRP mAbs as the first-line treatment.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Humanos , Administração Oral , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/imunologia , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inibidores , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/farmacologia , Ácido Valproico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêuticoAssuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Transtorno Autístico , Epilepsia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Ácido Valproico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Autístico/induzido quimicamente , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Risco , Ácido Valproico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Valproico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Lamotrigina/administração & dosagem , Lamotrigina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Epileptic spasms without hypsarrhythmia occur when patients do not display hypsarrhythmia on electroencephalogram (EEG) at the onset and throughout the clinical course. We report three patients of epileptic spasms in patients with early onset, all of whom experienced other types of seizures.We detail three patients (two boys and one girl) of epileptic spasms without hypsarrhythmia, occurring between 1 and 3 months of age, with no abnormalities detected on neurometabolic analysis and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Long-term video-EEG monitoring revealed epileptic spasms with focal onset seizures in two patients, and epileptic spasms followed by generalized tonic-clonic seizures in one patient. Hypsarrhythmia was never observed in repeated EEG examinations. Two patients achieved seizure freedom and improved development through treatment with topiramate alone or in combination with valproate, without requiring hormonal therapies or vigabatrin. The remaining patient achieved seizure freedom following administration of antiseizure medications, including topiramate, after a trial of adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy.We report the cases of three patients with early onset epileptic spasms without hypsarrhythmia. All patients achieved seizure freedom after topiramate treatment. Topiramate may be considered as a relatively effective antiseizure medication for early onset epileptic spasms without hypsarrhythmia.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Eletroencefalografia , Espasmos Infantis , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Espasmos Infantis/tratamento farmacológico , Espasmos Infantis/fisiopatologia , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n â= â95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n â= â48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P â< â0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P â< â0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR â= â0.67; adjusted P â= â0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsias Parciais , Lamotrigina , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Adulto , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Lamotrigina/administração & dosagem , Lamotrigina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Longitudinais , Resultado do Tratamento , Topiramato/administração & dosagem , Topiramato/uso terapêutico , Ácido Valproico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , AdolescenteRESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: El dolor lumbar crónico genera alta disfuncionalidad, su tratamiento es complejo y en algunos casos se presenta refractariedad a tratamientos convencionales. El síndrome de sensibilización central por dolor lumbar involucra presencia de síntomas ansiosos, depresivos, trastorno del sueño, fatiga, alteraciones del apetito y disfuncionalidad en actividades de la vida diaria. El manejo del dolor lumbar crónico con síndrome de sensibilización central es dificultoso, requiere de intervenciones multidimensionales y esquemas farmacológicos atípicos. OBJETIVO: Se describe el uso de topiramato como fármaco coadyuvante en el manejo de pacientes con dolor lumbar crónico resistente a tratamiento standard en 25 pacientes. MATERIALES Y MÉTODO: Seguimiento a 12 semanas y evaluación de funcionalidad, sintomatología ansiosa-depresiva, control del dolor y fatiga a través de múltiples escalas. Resultados: La dosis mediana fue de 300mg. El 72 por ciento (18 pacientes) presenta mejoría estadística en síntomas angustiosos, depresivos, sueño, EVA de dolor y fatiga y funcionalidad. Solo el 16 por ciento (4 pac) presentan reacciones adversas que obligan a suspensión del fármaco. El 12 por ciento (3 pacientes) no presentaron respuesta terapéutica. DISCUSIÓN: El topiramato podría ser una opción coadyuvante para el manejo del síndrome de dolor lumbar crónico con síndrome de sensibilización central.
INTRODUCTION: The chronic low back pain causes severe dysfunction, treatment is complex and in some cases it can be refractory to usual treatment. Central Sensitivity syndrome secondary to chronic low back pain is characterized by anxious, depressive, sleep disorders, fatigue, eating disorders and damage in daily activities life. Management of this syndrome must be integrative and multidimensional. OBJECTIVES: Describe the use of topiramate in 25 patients with chronic low back pain for pain relief in refractory patients to standard treatment, during 12 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following during 12 weeks, multiples Assessments about anxiety, depression, functionality, sleep quality, VAS pain and fatigue. Results: Median doses 300mg. 72 percent got pain relief, and decrease in anxious depressive symptoms, improve sleep quality, daily function. 16 percent didn't get pain relief and suffered adverse effects forcing suspension of the drug. 12 percent didn't get pain relief without adverse effects. DISCUSSION: Topiramate might be a treatment option for pain relief in these patients.