How do we mobilize and collect autologous peripheral blood stem cells?

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) has become a widely applied therapeutic approach for many hematologic and nonhematologic diseases. Adequate PBSC mobilization is critical to the success of ASCT. However, many factors can contribute to poor mobilization. Plerixafor is an effective yet costly adjunct agent that has been increasingly used to improve mobilization in a variety of diagnoses and clinical settings. However, to achieve both optimal cell collection yields and cost-effectiveness, the role of plerixafor in PBSC mobilization needs to be well defined in terms of triggers for initiating its use and criteria for monitoring response. As one of the largest hematopoietic transplant centers in the country, we have developed an approach to PBSC mobilization and collection that incorporates patient laboratory assessments, monitoring of the collection yields, and judicious use of plerixafor as well as various patient support and education programs. These measures have resulted in an increase in our collection success rate and a decrease in the mean number of collection days. In this article we describe our approach to autologous PBSC mobilization and collection. Pertinent reports in the literature are also reviewed and discussed.

Post-thaw viability of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) does not guarantee functional activity: important implications for quality assurance of stem cell transplant programmes.

Standard quality assurance (QA) of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) uses post-thaw viable CD34(+) cell counts. In 2013, concerns arose at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) about 8 patients with delayed engraftment following myeloablative chemotherapy with cryopreserved cell rescue, despite adequate post-thaw viable cell counts in all cases. Root cause analysis was undertaken; investigations suggested the freeze process itself was a contributing factor to suboptimal engraftment. Experiments were undertaken in which a single PBSC product was divided into three and cryopreserved in parallel using a control-rate freezer (CRF) or passive freezing method (-80°C freezer) at GOSH, or the same passive freezing at another laboratory. Viable CD34(+) counts were equivalent and adequate in each. Granulocyte-monocyte colony-forming unit assays demonstrated colonies from the products cryopreserved using passive freezing (both laboratories), but no colonies from products cryopreserved using the CRF. The CRF was shown to be operating within manufacturer's specifications with freeze-profile within acceptable limits. This experience has important implications for quality assurance for all transplant programmes, particularly those using cryopreserved products. The failure of post-thaw viable CD34(+) counts, the most widely used routine QA test available, to ensure PBSC function is of great concern and should prompt reassessment of protocols and QA procedures.

Comparison of Outcomes after Peripheral Blood Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Review.

Recent studies comparing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD) versus HLA-haploidentical donors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have suggested equivalent outcomes. The graft source used in most studies of haploidentical transplants has been bone marrow. Similar comparisons between MUD and haplo-HCT using peripheral blood as a graft source have not been adequately performed. We reviewed the records of all 52 AML patients who underwent haplo-HCT (using peripheral blood and post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide) between January 2010 and August 2015 at our institution and compared their outcomes with 88 patients who had a MUD transplant in the same time frame and were frequency matched (preanalysis) to the haploidentical group for conditioning intensity. Multivariate analysis found no difference in outcomes between the 2 groups with the exception of slower count recovery after haploidentical allografts (HR, .48; 95% CI, .32 to .74 for platelets, and HR, .47; 95% CI, .32 to .71 for neutrophils; P < .001 for both comparisons). Our retrospective analysis, although limited by the small sample size, suggests largely similar outcomes with peripheral blood haploidentical versus MUD transplants for AML.

Outcomes of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients from human leukocyte antigen matched or mismatched unrelated donors.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors (UR-PBSCT) is an alternative treatment for many hematologic diseases due to lack of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the degree of the HLA match on the clinical efficacy of UR-PBSCT. METHODS: Patients who underwent UR-PBSCT from September 2003 to September 2012 were retrospectively investigated. They were divided into three groups according to high-resolution molecular typing. SPSS version 17.0 was used to analysis and compare the statistics of engraftment, incidence of GVHD, other complications and survival among the groups. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients received UR-PBSCT, 60 of them with an HLA matched donor (10/10), 36 of them with a one locus mismatched donor (9/10), and 15 of them with a two loci mismatched donor (8/10). Similar basic characteristics were found in the three groups. No differences were found in engraftment of myeloid cells or platelets in the three groups (P > 0.05). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among those three groups were similar (P > 0.05). The cumulative incidence of 100-day III-IV aGVHD in the HLA matched group and the one HLA locus mismatched group were significantly lower than that in the two HLA loci mismatched group (3.3%, 8.6%, and 26.7%, P = 0.009). The occurrence rate of new pulmonary infections in the HLA matched group was lower than in the two HLA mismatched groups (26.67%, 52.78%, and 41.18%, P = 0.035). The cumulative incidence of 100-day and 2-year transplantation related mortality (TRM) in two HLA loci mismatched group was higher than in the HLA matched group and in the one HLA locus mismatched group, (8.4%, 11.8% and 33.3%, P = 0.016) and (12.3%, 18.7% and 47.5%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HLA mismatch will not significantly impact the engraftment or 2-year survival after UR-PBSCT, but two mismatched HLA loci may increase the cumulative incidence of severe aGVHD and TRM.

Central venous catheter insertion in peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell sibling donors: the SIdEM (Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation) point of view.

Collection of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) is the practice of choice for graft procurement in both autologous and allogeneic setting. The success of this procedure depends on the use of adequate vascular accesses. Well-sized peripheral veins are the first option in autologous and allogeneic donations. In autologous setting, in case of lack of adequate veins, central venous catheters (CVC) may be used for collection. In the allogeneic setting, although available data have shown the safety of the use of CVC, there are still some controversies about the possible insertion of a CVC in donors. A specific policy from competent registries is usually applied in the different countries to regulate the use of CVC in unrelated donors. In siblings, the question is still undefined due both to the lack of shared guidelines and to the specific characteristics of this donation. In fact, in not so rare cases, larger stem cell doses for specific cell manipulations (e.g., T/B cell depletion in the haploidentical setting) are needed. The lack of international rules or standard that forbid the use of a CVC in siblings and published data that document the safety of this procedure, allowed the Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIdEM) national Board to identify a possible, shared, operational approach to address this issue by a case-specific risk-benefit assessment.

A perspective on the selection of unrelated donors and cord blood units for transplantation.

Selection of a suitable graft for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation involves consideration of both donor and recipient characteristics. Of primary importance is sufficient donor-recipient HLA matching to ensure engraftment and acceptable rates of GVHD. In this Perspective, the National Marrow Donor Program and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research provide guidelines, based on large studies correlating graft characteristics with clinical transplantation outcomes, on appropriate typing strategies and matching criteria for unrelated adult donor and cord blood graft selection.

Setting the standard in T-cell-depleted haploidentical transplantation and beyond.

Much progress has been made in the clinical, biological and technical aspects of the T-cell-depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Our experience demonstrates that infusing a megadose of extensively T-cell-depleted hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cells after an immuno-myeloablative conditioning regimen in acute leukemia patients ensures sustained engraftment with minimal GvHD without the need of any post-transplant immunosuppressive treatment. Since our first successful pilot study, our efforts have concentrated on developing new conditioning regimens, optimizing the graft processing and improving the post-transplant immunological recovery. The results we have so far achieved in high risk acute leukemia patients show that haploidentical transplantation is now a clinical reality. The present challenge is to reduce post-transplant infectious mortality and several strategies are being tested.

Children with acute leukemia: a comparison of outcomes from allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relative merits of peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) versus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for children with standard and high-risk hematologic malignancies remain unclear. In a retrospective study, we compared allogeneic PBSCT (n = 30) with BMT (n = 110) in children with acute leukemia between January 2001 and September 2006. PROCEDURE: Median age for PBSCT was 9 years versus 8 years for BMT. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and medical variables. The unadjusted probabilities of disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association of graft-source and time to each of the study endpoints was estimated by Cox's regression model and the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was included as a time-dependent covariate. RESULTS: Time to neutrophil engraftment and platelet independence was faster after PBSCT than BMT (neutrophils 15.0 days vs. 17.0 days, P < 0.001; platelets, 21.0 days vs. 27.0 days, P = 0.034). The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 10.4% (SE 5.6%) after PBSCT and 15.1% (SE 3.5%) after BMT (P = NS). The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 13.8% (SE 6.3%) after PBSCT and 11.3% (SE 3.1%) after BMT (P = NS). One-year disease-free survival was 37.9% (SE 9.0%) for PBSCT recipients versus 65.1% (SE 4.6%) after BMT (P = 0.005) but this difference was not sustained in multivariate analysis. Thus, only disease risk and pre-transplant CMV seropositivity were significant predictors of disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PBSCT for children produces faster engraftment without increased risk of acute or chronic GvHD.

Post-thaw viable CD34(+) cell count is a valuable predictor of haematopoietic stem cell engraftment in autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, the number of CD34(+) cells infused is considered a predictor of haematopoietic engraftment. However, the currently accepted minimal threshold of CD34(+) cells/kg was determined by counting CD34(+) cells before freezing, and the loss of viable CD34(+) cells during freezing, cryopreservation or thawing prior to reinfusion has not been assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total and viable CD34(+) cells were quantified using single platform flow cytometry and viability dye, 7-amino actinomycin D (7-ADD), at the time of collection and prior to reinfusion in 46 peripheral haematopoietic stem cell grafts from 36 patients. The time to engraftment of neutrophil and platelet was assessed by routine peripheral blood cell counts performed daily. RESULTS: The median number of viable CD34(+) cells harvested was 3.6 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.05-21.2), and the median viability was 98% (range 70-100%) before freezing. After thawing, the median number of viable CD34(+) cells was reduced to 2.2 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.04-14.8) and the median viability was reduced to 71% (range 31-89%). The number of viable CD34(+) cells/kg before freezing and after thawing significantly correlated with engraftment of neutrophils (P < 0.0001 both) and platelets (P = 0.007 and 0.006, respectively). Although the minimum dose for engraftment (2.0 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) was harvested in 37 of 46 cases (85%), only 25 cases (54%) met this threshold at the time of reinfusion. For platelet engraftment, determination of viable CD34(+) cells prior to reinfusion was more important than enumeration at the time of collection. CONCLUSION: Quantification of post-thaw viable CD34(+) cells better represents the actual composition of the graft and may be a more accurate predictor of haematopoietic engraftment than post-thaw total CD34(+) cell counts, or prefreeze determinations, especially for platelet engraftment. It is necessary to develop good quality controls for freezing and thawing procedures to minimize variance in cell viability.

Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield.

In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34(+) cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 x 10(6)/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34(+) cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells.

Early and long-term engraftment after autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

This study aimed to identify which subset of CD34+ cells might be the most predictive of early and long-term hematopoietic recovery following autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The relationships between the number of 'mature' subsets of CD34+ cells (CD34+/CD33+, CD34+/CD38+, CD34+/DR+ and CD34+/CD90-) and 'immature' subsets of CD34+ cells (CD34+/CD33-, CD34+/CD38-, CD34+/DR- and CD34+/CD90+) and early and long-term hemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts were studied in a homogeneous series (for disease, pre-transplant chemotherapy, mobilization chemotherapy, conditioning regimen) of 26 AML patients after autologous PBSCT. Cell counts were performed before and after cryopreservation, but only after thawing were the cell counts used for correlation with early and long-term engraftment. The number of CD34+/CD38- cells infused correlated with the neutrophil (r = 0.88, p < 0.005) and platelet counts (r = 0.67, p < 0.05) at 12 months after PBSCT. This correlation was better than that for the total CD34+ cell dose at 12 months (r = 0.36, p = 0.09 for neutrophil count and r = 0.48, p = 0.06 for platelets count). The number of CD34+/CD90+ cells was also correlated with the platelet counts at 6 (r = 0.70, p < 0.05) and 12 months (r = 0.80, p = 0.005) after PBSCT. This correlation was better than the total dose of CD34+ cells at 6 (r = 0.31, p = 0.3) and 12 months (r = 0.48, p = 0.06) for the platelet counts. CD34+ subset analysis suggests that for early engraftment the total number of CD34+ cells infused is more strongly correlated than the CD34+ subsets, whereas the CD34+/CD38- and CD34+/CD90+ subsets may be associated with sustained long-term neutrophil and platelet engraftment. These findings may help to predict the repopulating capacity of PBSCs in AML patients after autologous PBSCT, especially when a relatively low number of CD34+ cells is infused.

Lack of isohemagglutinin production following minor ABO incompatible unrelated HLA mismatched umbilical cord blood transplantation.

While immune hemolysis due to donor isohemagglutinin (IH) production often complicates minor ABO incompatible peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), it is not known if this occurs with umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). We compared IH production and hemolysis following minor ABO allogeneic PBSCT and UCBT. We reviewed 24 ABO minor incompatible allogeneic PBSCTs and 14 ABO minor incompatible UCBTs. Patients were evaluated for donor-derived IH by reverse ABO grouping. Evaluation of hemolysis was based on clinical and laboratory findings of anemia associated with increased RBC transfusion need, concomitant with the appearance of donor-derived IH. Of the 24 ABO minor incompatible allogeneic PBSCTs, 15 produced donor-derived IH from 6 to 88 days following transplantation, with seven of 15 patients exhibiting clinically evident hemolysis. There was no significant difference in days to leukocyte engraftment or infused CD34 cells in patients with or without donor-derived IH. None of the 14 patients receiving ABO incompatible UCBTs showed evidence of donor-derived IH following transplantation with a median follow-up of 60 days. We conclude that donor IHs are not produced in patients undergoing minor ABO incompatible UCBTs suggesting fundamental immunologic differences between allogeneic PBSCT and UCBT.

Use of G-CSF in matched sibling donor pediatric allogeneic transplantation: a consensus statement from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Transplant Discipline Committee and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) Executive Committee.

Preliminary studies indicate that G-CSF-primed marrow harvesting may result in a graft with increased mononuclear cells collected, increased CD34(+) stem and progenitor cell dose and a potential for more rapid engraftment. Increased cell dose plus other potential positive effects of G-CSF priming have resulted in improved survival in non-randomized preliminary studies. These benefits may be available without the increased risk of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) that is experienced with allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant. A phase III Children's Oncology Group (COG)/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium (PBMTC) trial comparing G-CSF-primed marrow to standard marrow has been proposed. This document reviews background studies of G-CSF-primed marrow and addresses benefits and risks of G-CSF administration to normal pediatric donors. We conclude that the approach is promising and warrants further study. Risks of G-CSF to the donor are minimal and benefits to both donor and recipient may occur.

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood as a predictor of the CD34(+) yield in patients going to autologous stem cell transplantation.

The number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood (PB) is a guide to the optimal timing to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). The objective was to determine the number of CD34(+) cells in PB that allows achieving a final apheresis product containing > or =1.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, performing up to three aphereses. Between March 1999 and August 2003, patients with hematological and solid malignancies who underwent leukapheresis for autologous bone marrow transplantation were prospectively evaluated. Seventy-two aphereses in 48 patients were performed (mean 1.45 per patient; range 1-3). PBPC were mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (n = 40), other chemotherapy drugs plus G-CSF (n = 7), or G-CSF alone (n = 1). We found a strong correlation between the CD34(+) cells count in peripheral blood and the CD34(+) cells yielded (r = 0.903; P < 0.0001). Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the minimum number of CD34(+) cells in PB to obtain > or =1.5 x 10(6)/kg in the first apheresis was 16.48 cells/microL (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95%). The best cut-off point necessary to obtain the same target in the final harvest was 15.48 cells/microL, performing up to three aphereses (sensitivity 89%; specificity 100%). In our experience, > or =15 CD34(+) cells/microL is the best predictor to begin the apheresis procedure. Based on this threshold level, it is possible to achieve at least 1.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells in the graft with < or =3 collections.

Transplantation with higher dose of natural killer cells associated with better outcomes in terms of non-relapse mortality and infectious events after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the role of the CD56+ natural killer (NK) cell dose on the outcome of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Recently, higher dose of NK cells has been associated with a lower incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The current study attempted to evaluate the effect of the NK cell dose on transplant outcomes in allogeneic PBSCT setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-one cytokine mobilized PBSC recipients were analyzed according to the infused dose of CD34+ cells and NK cells in relation to overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), GVHD, and infectious events. RESULTS: The group received a higher dose of NK cells (> or =5 x 10(7)/kg) showed a lower incidence of NRM (P = 0.0186) and infectious events (P = 0.0107). In a multivariate analysis, a higher dose of NK cells was correlated to better transplant outcomes for NRM (P = 0.042) with CD34+ cell dose (P = 0.018), and for infectious events (P = 0.013) with CD34+ cell dose (P = 0.016). Higher NK cell infusion group also showed a faster immune recovery in serial measurements at days +90, +180, and +365. CONCLUSIONS: High dose of NK cells may play an important role in improving transplant outcomes, in terms of reducing NRM and infectious events together with CD34+ cells.

Autologous stem cells derived from the peripheral blood compared to standard bone marrow transplant; time to engraftment: a systematic review.

Lymphoma patients who require high dose chemotherapy are 'rescued' by reinfusion of stem cells to repopulate their bone marrow and minimise the risk of fatal infections or haemorrhage. This review evaluated the evidence for the use of stem cells derived from the peripheral blood to speed the engraftment of neutrophil and platelets when compared to standard bone marrow transplant. A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline and Embase was carried out to identify randomised controlled trials comparing haematological recovery following these two interventions which met predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four studies were critically appraised and found to follow heterogenous protocols but were otherwise of satisfactory quality. All four studies demonstrated an advantage of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation over bone marrow transplantation in terms of neutrophil recovery and three out of four demonstrated the same trend for platelet engraftment. In sum, there is evidence to support the use of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for this population of lymphoma patients. Nurses can share this information confidently with patients and other staff. However, a more extensive review of studies which have investigated the association between extended neutrophil and platelet recovery and length of hospitalisation, number of septic neutropenic episodes and cost reduction is needed to give a fuller picture of the effects for treatment.

ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.

The ESHAP (etoposide, methylprednisolone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin) regimen has been shown to be effective as an active salvage therapy for lymphoma. Mobilizing stem cells following ESHAP should decrease time to transplantation by making separate mobilizing chemotherapy (MC) unnecessary, while controlling a patient's lymphoma. We therefore assessed the mobilization potential of ESHAP plus G-CSF in 26 patients (ESHAP group) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and compared these results with those of 24 patients with NHL who received high-dose (4 g/m2l) cyclophosphamide (HDCY) as MC (HDCY group). The age, sex, and radiotherapy to the axial skeleton were well matched between groups, but the number of patients with poor mobilization predictors was higher in the ESHAP group. Significantly higher numbers of CD34+ cells (x 10(6)/kg) (17.1+/-18.8 vs 5.8+/-5.0, P=0.03) and apheresis day 1 CD34+ cells (x 10(6)/kg) (5.5+/-6.6 vs 1.7+/-2.0, P=0.014) were collected from the ESHAP group than from the HDCY group, and the number of patients who achieved an optimal CD34+ cell target of 5 x 10(6)/kg was higher in the ESHAP group (81 vs 50%, P=0.022). Log-rank test revealed that time to target peripheral blood progenitor cell collection (> or =5 x 10(6)/kg) was shorter in the ESHAP group (P=0.007). These results indicate that ESHAP plus G-CSF is an excellent mobilization regimen in patients with relapsed and poor-risk aggressive NHL.

Quality control of bacterial contamination in autologous peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Microbiological follow-up is part of quality control of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) manipulation. DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively studied microbiological cultures performed in 865 consecutive untreated autologous PBSC harvests from 348 patients. Our aim was to know the rate of microbiological contamination, the optimum moment to evaluate the sample and the clinical significance of the positive findings. RESULTS: Fifty-nine of the 852 samples (6.9%) yielded a positive culture after PBSC collection (sample 1) and 62 samples also yielded positive results before cryopreservation (7.2%) (sample 2). At the time of the analysis, a total of 520 aphereses had been infused and the number of positive cultures after thawing (sample 3) and after washing (sample 4; 82 aphereses) was 5.4% and 2.3%, respectively. Most of the positive cultures were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (48 isolates). After thawing 15 coagulase-negative staphylococci and 2 enterococci isolates were recovered. Comparison between samples using a marginal homogeneity test showed no differences in the rate of contamination observed at the different sampling points. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Positive microbiological findings in collected PBSC are not due to contamination within the laboratory. Cryopreservation using DMSO does not eradicate bacteria and manipulation does not seem to affect results. To simplify the procedure it would be possible to eliminate the microbiological controls performed immediately before cryopreservation.