Underexplored Areas of Photobiomodulation in Oral Oncology: An Expert Analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to review the current body of literature on underexplored areas of photobiomodulation (PBM) for preventing and/or treating oral adverse events. Background: Recent studies suggest that PBM may offer potential benefits in managing cancer-related toxicities other than oral mucositis. Nevertheless, further research to establish conclusive evidence is still missing. Methods: A panel of specialists conducted a narrative review to evaluate the evidence on PBM therapy for oral mucositis, xerostomia, dysgeusia, dysphagia, and trismus/fibrosis. Each topic was reviewed by two specialists who discussed treatment rationale, summarized current evidence, evaluated risk/benefit ratio, and identified future research directions. Results: The current evidence suggests promising outcomes in nonroutine uses of PBM for xerostomia, dysgeusia, odynophagia, oral mucositis (extraoral PBM and the pediatric population), and trismus/fibrosis. However, the primary studies are often small and may have biases that require further evaluation, particularly regarding treatment safety. Conclusion: Despite the overall positive impression of PBM therapy for oral adverse events of cancer treatment, robust evidence from large multicentered studies is necessary to support its widespread clinical use.

Can dysphagia aspiration related structures (DARS) be spared in patients with oropharyngeal cancers? Dosimetric evaluation in a prospective study of DARS optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the dysphagia-aspiration-related structures (DARS) in various head and neck cancer sites treated with definitive DARS-optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Target volumes, organs at risk, and in addition, individual DARS were delineated, including the superior, middle, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscles, supraglottic and glottic larynx, the base of the tongue, esophageal inlet muscles and cervical esophagus in 35 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Volume-based dose constraints were applied to the DARS outside the planning target volume (PTV). An IMRT plan was then generated to limit doses to DARS without compromising PTV dose coverage. RESULTS: Twelve (34.3%) patients had an oropharyngeal primary (OPX), 18 (51.4%) had a laryngeal, and 5 (14.3%) patients had hypopharyngeal primary. The mean dose to the DARS was 47.93 Gy for the entire group, while it was 54.6 Gy in oropharyngeal primaries and 44.4 Gy in laryngopharyngeal primaries. DARS mean dose of ≤45 Gy could be achieved in a significantly lesser number of patients with oropharyngeal primaries (P < 0.02). Similarly, DARS mean dose was 42.25 Gy in patients with N0 disease, 49.6 Gy with ipsilateral involved nodes, and 55 Gy with bilateral disease. Sparing of DARS was feasible when the volume of PTV was ≤150 cc (P < 0.025). CONCLUSION: Sparing of DARS structures appears to be challenging in patients with oropharyngeal cancers without compromising the dose to the PTVs while it is feasible in laryngopharyngeal cancers. DARS sparing is feasible when the PTV volume is < 150 cc and in patients with negative or unilateral nodal disease.

Sparing Swallowing-Related Structures Reduces Post-Radiotherapy Dysphagia in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To identify swallowing-related structures (SRSs) predicting post-radiotherapy dysphagia in oropharyngeal carcinoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2020 and October 2022, oropharyngeal cancer patients who had completed radiotherapy at least one year before without recurrence or residuals were selected. They underwent flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) assessments and dysphagia grading. The mean radiation doses delivered to their SRSs were recalculated. The correlation between radiation doses to each SRS and FEES scores was analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants, aged 51-73 years, were enrolled. Six patients had received two-dimensional radiotherapy, eight had undergone three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and fifteen had received intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Radiation doses to the inferior pharyngeal constrictor, cricopharyngeus and glottic larynx significantly predicted dysphagia for both semisolids (p = 0.023, 0.030 and 0.001) and liquid diets (p = 0.021, 0.013 and 0.002). The esophageal inlet significantly predicted swallowing outcomes for only the liquid diet (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that SRS-sparing during radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancers improves swallowing outcomes.

Improving survival prediction of oesophageal cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy for dysphagia.

INTRODUCTION: The recent POLDER trial investigated the effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on dysphagia caused by incurable oesophageal cancer. An estimated life expectancy of minimally three months was required for inclusion. However, nearly one-third of the included patients died within three months. The aim of this study was to investigate if the use of prediction models could have improved the physician's estimation of the patient's survival. METHODS: Data from the POLDER trial (N = 110) were linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry to retrieve patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics. Two published prediction models (the SOURCE model and Steyerberg model) were used to predict three-month survival for all patients included in the POLDER trial. Predicted survival probabilities were dichotomised and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance. RESULTS: The SOURCE and Steyerberg model had an accuracy of 79% and 64%, and an AUC of 0.76 and 0.60 (p = .017), respectively. The SOURCE model had higher specificity across survival cut-off probabilities, the Steyerberg model had a higher sensitivity beyond the survival probability cut-off of 0.7. Using optimal cut-off probabilities, SOURCE would have wrongfully included 16/110 patients into the POLDER and Steyerberg 34/110. CONCLUSION: The SOURCE model was found to be a more useful decision aid than the Steyerberg model. Results showed that the SOURCE model could be used for three-month survival predictions for patients that are considered for palliative treatment of dysphagia caused by oesophageal cancer in addition to clinicians' judgement.

A novel irradiation stent versus conventional irradiation stent for malignant dysphagia: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate whether a novel irradiation stent (NIS) could decrease the rate of recurrent dysphagia, compared to the conventional irradiation stent (CIS) in patients with malignant dysphagia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an open-label randomized controlled trial of participants with malignant dysphagia. A total of 94 participants were parallelly allocated into the NIS group or the NIS group between April 2019 and April 2020. The primary endpoint was the rate of recurrent dysphagia. The secondary endpoints included technical success, clinical success, overall survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: The technical success rate and the clinical success rate was 100.0% (47/47) in both groups. The median follow-up period was 189 days (range 14-422 days). Recurrent dysphagia was observed in 12.8% (6/47) of patients in the NIS group and 31.9% (15/47) in the CIS group (P = 0.026). Tissue/tumor growth occurred in 4 patients (8.5%) after NIS placement and 12 (25.5%) after CIS placement (P = 0.028). Stent migration occurred in 2 patients (4.3%) after NIS placement and 3 (6.4%) after CIS placement (P = 0.646). No food obstruction was found in both groups. The median overall survival was 177 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 139-214) in the NIS group and 168 days (95% CI 153-183) in the CIS group (P = 0.932). The incidence of severe adverse events was comparable between the two groups (21.3% vs. 17.0%, P = 0.600). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with malignant dysphagia, compared with CIS, NIS could decrease the rate of tissue/tumor growth without increase the rate of stent migration and therefore decrease the rate of recurrent dysphagia.

[State of art of photobiomodulation in the management of radiotherapy adverse events: Indications and level of evidence]. / État de l'art de la photobiomodulation dans la prise en charge des effets secondaires de la radiothérapie : indications et niveaux de preuve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current and potential indications of photobiomodulation (PBM) and their level of evidence in the prevention or management of radiation therapy-related side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Scopus, and LILACS databases were systematically reviewed to include and analyze publications of clinical studies that have assessed PBM in the prevention or management of radiotherapy-related side effects. The keywords used were "photobiomodulation"; "low level laser therapy"; "acute oral mucositis"; "acute dysphagia"; "acute radiation dermatitis"; "lymphedema"; "xerostomia"; "hyposalivation"; "trismus"; "bone necrosis"; "osteoradionecrosis"; and "radiation induced fibrosis". Prospective studies were included, whereas retrospective cohorts and non-original articles were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: PBM in the red or infrared spectrum has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in the prevention and management of radiotherapy-related side effects, especially acute oral mucositis, acute radiation dermatitis, and upper extremity lymphedema. The level of evidence associated with PBM was heterogeneous, but overall was still moderate. The main shortcomings were the diversity and lack of detail in treatment protocols, which could have compromised efficiency and reproducibility of PBM results. CONCLUSION: The published data suggest that PBM may be considered as a full-fledged supportive care for patients treated with radiotherapy, or at least in the setting of a therapeutic clinical trial. However, until strong evidence has been published on its long-term safety, the use of PBM should be considered with caution, specifically when applied near areas with proven or potential tumors. The patient should be informed of the theoretical benefits and risks of PBM in order to obtain his informed consent before treatment.

Radioactive Stent for Malignant Esophageal Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Purpose: To compare the relative clinical efficacies of radioactive and normal stent insertion methods as a means of treating patients suffering from malignant esophageal obstruction (MEO). Materials and Methods: The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the date of inception through to July 2020. RevMan v5.3 was used for all data analyses. Results: This meta-analysis included six RCTs that included a total of 194 patients who had undergone radioactive stent insertion and 209 who had normal stent insertion. There were no significant differences in pooled improvement of dysphagia scores (P = .40), rates of stent restenosis (24.7% versus 28.7%, P = .35), stent migration (3.3% versus 4.4%, P = .61), severe chest pain (22.8% versus 20.3%, P = .61), hemorrhage (11.0% versus 9.8%, P = .80), or fistula formation (6.1% versus 4.2%, P = .55) between two groups. The pooled time to restenosis (P < .00001) and survival (P < .00001) were significant longer in the radioactive stent group. Significant heterogeneity was detected in the endpoint of improvement of dysphagia score (I2 = 89%; P = .0002). Funnel plot analyses did not detect any evidence of publication bias pertaining to the selected study endpoints. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that radioactive stent insertion can prolong stent patency and survival for patients with MEO compared with normal stent insertion.

MRI- and CT-determined changes of dysphagia / aspiration-related structures (DARS) during and after radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The concept of dysphagia/aspiration-related structures (DARS) was developed against the background of severe late side effects of radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). DARS can be delineated on CT scans, but with a better morphological discrimination on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Swallowing function was analyzed by use of patient charts and prospective investigations and questionnaires. METHOD: Seventeen HNC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) ± chemotherapy between 5/2012 - 8/2015 were included. Planning CT (computed tomography) scans and MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging) prior, during 40 Gray (Gy) radiotherapy and posttreatment were available and co-registered to delineate DARS. The RT dose of each DARS was calculated. Five patients were investigated posttreatment for swallowing function and assessed by means of various questionnaires for quality of life (QoL), swallowing, and voice function. RESULTS: By retrospective comparison of DARS volume, a significant change in four of eight DARS was detected over time. Three increased and one diminished. The risk of posttreatment dysphagia rose by every 1Gy above the mean dose (D mean) of RT to DARS. 7.5 was the risk factor for dysphagia in the first 6 months, reducing to 4.7 for months 6-12 posttreatment. For all five patients of the prospective part of swallowing investigations, a function disturbance was detected. These results were in contrast to the self-assessment of patients by questionnaires. There was neither a dose dependency of D mean DARS volume changes over time nor of dysphonia and no correlation between volume changes, dysphagia or dysphonia. CONCLUSION: Delineation of DARS on MRI co-registered to planning CT gave the opportunity to differentiate morphology better than by CT alone. Due to the small number of patients with complete MRI scans over time, we failed to detect a dose dependency of DARS and swallowing and voice disorder posttreatment.

Short-Course External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Brachytherapy for Palliation of Dysphagia in Esophageal Cancer: A Matched Comparison of Two Prospective Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Short-course external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy are both accepted treatments for the palliation of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer. We compared the effects of both treatments from two prospective studies. METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with metastasized or otherwise incurable esophageal cancer requiring palliation of dysphagia from September 2016 to March 2019. Patients were treated with EBRT in five fractions of 4 Gy. Data were compared with all patients treated with a single brachytherapy dose of 12 Gy in the SIREC (Stent or Intraluminal Radiotherapy for inoperable Esophageal Cancer) trial, both between the original cohorts and between 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts. The primary end point was an improvement of dysphagia at 3 months without reintervention. The secondary end points included toxicity and time-to-effect. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients treated with EBRT and 93 patients who underwent brachytherapy were eligible for analysis. In the original cohorts, dysphagia improved after EBRT in 79% of patients compared with 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.058). Propensity score matching resulted in 69 patients in each cohort well-balanced at baseline. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in 83% after EBRT versus 64% after brachytherapy (p = 0.048). In responding patients, improvement of dysphagia at 2 weeks was observed in 67% after EBRT compared with 35% after brachytherapy, and the maximum effect was reached after 4 weeks in 55% and 33%, respectively. Severe toxicity occurred in 3% of patients after EBRT compared with 13% after brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course EBRT appears at least as effective as brachytherapy in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with esophageal cancer.

Radiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an aggressive disease. Many patients have locally advanced disease or already have distant metastasis at presentation. Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves the survival and surgical outcome compared to surgery alone. Definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy is used in patients who decline surgery or are medically inoperable. Palliative radiotherapy using external beam radiotherapy or intraluminal brachytherapy is effective for dysphagia and pain control.d.

Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer with atelectasis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, no study has reported mediastinal shift accompanied with obstructive atelectasis due to bulky primary esophageal tumor components treated with adaptive radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report the case of a 65-year-old male patient diagnosed with locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer, clinical T4bN1M0, stage IVA. Bronchoscopy and computed tomography (CT) revealed an almost complete obstruction of the lumen of the left bronchus due to compression by bulky primary esophageal tumor components. On admission, the patient presented with dyspnea and decreased arterial oxygen saturation. Chest radiography and CT on admission revealed mediastinal shift with left atelectasis, as opposed to findings from the chest radiography performed 26 days before admission. Because of the patient's overall good condition, we recommended definitive chemoradiotherapy instead of palliative bronchial stent placement. After obtaining the patient's consent, chemoradiotherapy was initiated on the following day and it comprised three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 60 Gy in 30 fractions with concurrent administration of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. During chemoradiotherapy, tumor location was monitored with cone-beam CT and chest radiography. Chemoradiotherapy on day 8 revealed no evidence of the mediastinal shift. CT simulation was reperformed to adjust the radiotherapy fields to account for geometrical changes induced by the absence of the mediastinal shift. Subsequently, the mediastinal shift and bronchial obstruction did not recur during the course of chemoradiotherapy. The patient completed the planned radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, and no non-hematological grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed. Complete response was confirmed 7 months after initiating chemoradiotherapy. Currently, no disease recurrence, dysphagia, or respiratory symptoms have been reported at 13 months after initiating chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a bulky primary esophageal tumor caused mediastinal shift due to ipsilateral bronchial obstruction. The close follow-up for monitoring resolution of the mediastinal shift during the course of chemoradiotherapy enabled adequate dose delivery to targets, thus reflecting the geometrical changes induced by the absence of the mediastinal shift. Adaptive radiotherapy technique was crucial for favorable patient outcomes in this challenging clinical situation.

Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Radiation Therapy for the Palliation of Dysphagia From Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Clinical evidence regarding optimal radiation dose for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer is generally lacking. In an effort to investigate optimal radiation dose, we assessed 2 different radiation schedules for palliation of dysphagia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study comparing low-dose radiation therapy (LR: 5 x 4 Gy external beam radiation therapy [EBRT]) with high-dose radiation therapy (HR: 10 x 3 Gy EBRT and 12-Gy single-dose intraluminal brachytherapy) for palliation of dysphagia in patients with inoperable or metastasized esophageal cancer. Primary outcome was improvement of dysphagia at 6 weeks after start of radiation therapy. Additional outcomes were persistent and recurrent dysphagia during patients' remaining life, severe adverse events, and survival. RESULTS: In total, 292 patients (LR, n = 117; HR, n = 175) were included in this study. After matching, 144 patients (72 in each group) were compared. Improvement of dysphagia at 6 weeks was achieved in 50% of patients after LR and in 66% after HR (P = .071). Persistent or recurrent dysphagia occurred in 64% of patients after LR and in 42% after HR (P = .012). No difference in the rate of severe adverse events was found (P = .889). Median survival was 88 days (95% confidence interval, 64-112) after LR and 177 days (95% confidence interval, 131-223) after HR (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both LR and HR were well tolerated and effective in short-term relief of dysphagia in patients with inoperable or metastasized esophageal cancer. HR was associated with better long-term relief of dysphagia compared with LR. Our findings suggest that HR could be considered for patients with a longer life expectancy, but prospective studies are required.

Palliative short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinoma: the phase II PALAESTRA trial.

Background: The majority of patients with incurable esophageal adenocarcinoma suffer from dysphagia. We assessed a novel treatment strategy with initial short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy with the primary aim to achieve long-term relief of dysphagia.Methods: This phase II trial included treatment-naîve patients with dysphagia due to esophageal adenocarcinoma not eligible for curative treatment. External beam radiotherapy with 20 Gy in five fractions to the primary tumor was followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (FOLFOX regimen). Dysphagia was assessed using a five-grade scale.Results: From October 2014 to May 2018 a total of 29 patients were enrolled. The rate of dysphagia improvement was 79%, median duration of improvement 6.7 months (12.2 months for responders) and median overall survival 9.9 months. In the pre-specified per protocol analysis (23 patients) the rate of dysphagia improvement was 91%, median duration of improvement 12.2 months (14.0 months for responders) and median overall survival 16.0 months. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29%), infection (25%), anorexia (11%), esophagitis (11%) and fatigue (11%).Conclusion: Initial palliative short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is a promising treatment strategy that can provide long-lasting relief of dysphagia in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Photobiomodulation Therapy in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis, Dysphagia, Oral Dryness, Taste Alteration, and Burning Mouth Sensation Due to Cancer Therapy: A Case Series.

Oral complications of cancer therapy, such as oral dryness, dysphagia, and taste alteration, are associated with a negative impact in the quality of life of the patients. Few supportive care measures are available for such complications. This case series reveals the effectiveness of the photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy when used in a specific protocol and parameters, in the management of oral complications related to cancer therapy. Dysphagia was measured using the functional outcome swallowing scale for staging oropharyngeal dysphagia (FOSS). Oral mucositis was measured according to the National Cancer Institute scale. The quantity of the whole resting and stimulated saliva was measured in order to assess the oral dryness. In addition, the taste alteration was measured according to a protocol suggested by the International Standards organization (ISO). Sensation of burning mouth was measured using a visual analogue scale. These measurements were made before treatment, during, and at the end of the treatment. Diode laser 635 nm was used in 3 J/cm2. Five sessions interleaved with 24 h breaks were conducted for the dysphagia and oral dryness, and 10 sessions were conducted for the taste alteration and burning mouth sensation. Regardless of the limitations of this case series, PBM can be considered safe, time saving, and a promising approach for the management of the oral complications due to cancer therapy and the quality of life of cancer patients.

Very late xerostomia, dysphagia, and neck fibrosis after head and neck radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Acute and late toxicity after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) impacts on patient quality of life; yet, very late toxicity data remain scarce. This study assessed dysphagia, xerostomia, and neck fibrosis 3-8 years after IMRT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis using generalized estimated equations was performed on 60 patients with HNC treated with fractionated IMRT between 2000 and 2015 who had a follow-up ≥8 years. Toxicity was scored using LENT-SOMA scales. RESULTS: A trend towards a nonlinear global time effect (P = .05) was noted for dysphagia with a decrease during the 5 years post-treatment and an increase thereafter. A significant decrease in xerostomia (P = .001) and an increase in neck fibrosis (P = .04) was observed until 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia, xerostomia, and neck fibrosis do not appear stable over time and remain highly prevalent in the very late follow-up. Our findings support the need for prospective trials investigating very late toxicity in patients with HNC.

A New Fully Covered Irradiation Stent Versus a Partially Covered Irradiation Stent for Unresectable Malignant Dysphagia: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a newly developed fully covered irradiation stent (FCIS) compared with a partially covered irradiation stent (PCIS) in patients with unresectable malignant dysphagia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 195 patients [158 (81.0%) males, median age of 75 years (range 49-89 years)] who underwent FCIS or PCIS placement for unresectable malignant dysphagia from January 2012 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The median follow-up time was 181 days (range 4-547 days). Outcomes were measured in terms of recurrent dysphagia (primary), technical success, clinical success, overall survival, and adverse events. Recurrent dysphagia was analyzed by Fine-Gray regression model. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 97.8% (87/89) in the FCIS group and 99.1% (105/106) in the PCIS group (P = 0.59). The clinical success rate was 100.0% in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrent dysphagia rate between the FCIS and PCIS groups (21.8% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.12). Compared with PCISs, FCISs were associated with a decrease in tissue/tumor growth rate (11.5% vs. 21.9%; P = 0.01), while stent migration rates were statistically comparable (11.5% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.23). The median overall survivals were comparable between the FCIS and PCIS groups (164 days vs. 162 days; P = 0.70). A dysphagia score of 4 and metastasis were risk factors for survival. No significant differences were observed in the rates of adverse events, including chest pain, fistula formation, hemorrhage, and aspiration pneumonia (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients with unresectable malignant dysphagia, this newly developed FCIS can provide efficacy and safety comparable to those of a PCIS. Compared with PCIS, this FCIS is more successful in preventing tissue/tumor growth, with a comparable stent migration rate.

Brachytherapy in the Palliation of Oesophageal Cancer: Effective but Impractical?

Dysphagia in people with advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated by oesophageal stents, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy. Despite guidelines recommending brachytherapy for patients with a predicted life expectancy exceeding 3 months, its uptake in the UK has been limited. Here we examine the strength of the evidence supporting the use of brachytherapy compared with oesophageal stents and EBRT and possible reasons for its limited uptake. Trials and observational studies suggest brachytherapy alone confers a benefit to patients, but its impact is less immediate than oesophageal stents; the evidence on effectiveness and value-for-money is limited. Moreover, stronger evidence will probably be insufficient to increase uptake, due to the extra complexity of delivery compared with stents and EBRT and a lack of experience among specialists.

Factors associated with overall survival and relief of dysphagia in advanced esophageal cancer patients after 125I seed-loaded stent placement: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Iodine-125 (125I) seed-loaded stent placement has served as an effective palliation for malignant esophageal strictures in China. We performed a retrospective study to identify the prognostic factors of this irradiation stent placement in advanced esophageal cancer patients. A total of 201 patients who underwent 125I seed-loaded stent placement were included in this study from June 2012 to March 2016 at five hospitals in China. The Cox regression models adjusted for stratification factors were used, and a stepwise multivariate analysis was performed to predict the overall survival and relief of dysphagia on the basis of pretreatment clinical characteristics, respectively. Three independent prognostic factors were identified for overall survival: histopathological subtype (squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma, hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI95%]: 1.01-2.09, P = 0.046), serum total protein (≥66 g/L vs. <66 g/L, HR 0.61, CI95%: 0.48-0.59, P = 0.023), and performance status (<2 vs. ≥2, HR 1.57, CI95%: 1.09-2.08, P = 0.013). Four factors were significantly associated with the relief of dysphagia: T stage (T3 vs. T4, P = 0.003), tumor location (superior vs. inferior, P = 0.049), tumor-node-metastasis classification (IV vs. II, P = 0.025), and age (≥71 years vs. <71 years, P = 0.029). Prognostic factors identified from this analysis can be used to aid clinical decision-making and design future clinical trials.

Palliative Radiotherapy in the Local Management of Stage IVB Esophageal Cancer: Factors Affecting Swallowing and Survival.

AIM: To clarify the role of external-beam radiotherapy in the local management of state IVB esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of 31 patients with histopathologically-proven squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radiotherapy for their primary lesion. The change in dysphagia score from before to after treatment was assessed. Nutritional support-free survival (NSFS) was also evaluated. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 6 months. The overall rate of improvement in dysphagia score was 73% (23/31). The median NSFS was 5 months. Age at presentation <67 years, tumor location in the middle thoracic esophagus, and tumor length <7 cm were associated with significant improvement in swallowing scores. Responders to radiotherapy had significantly longer NSFS than non-responders (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Palliative radiotherapy in the local management of stage IVB esophageal cancer is an effective treatment option for dysphagia. Factors highly associated with improvement of swallowing are age, tumor location, and tumor length. Response to radiotherapy is the most important factor in improving NSFS.