Evaluation of DOAC Dipstick Test for Detecting Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Urine Compared with a Clinically Relevant Plasma Threshold Concentration.

Measuring direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations might be necessary in certain clinical situations but is not routinely performed. The DOAC Dipstick is a new rapid test for detecting DOACs in urine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible uses and limitations of the DOAC Dipstick and to compare visual analysis and DOASENSE Reader analysis of DOAC Dipstick pads. Plasma and urine samples were collected from 23 patients taking DOACs. DOAC concentrations in plasma and urine were measured by chromogenic substrate assays and in urine also by the DOAC Dipstick. Plasma concentrations were dichotomized at a threshold of ≥30 ng/mL. Patient samples were compared with samples from control individuals not using anticoagulants (n = 10) and with DOASENSE control urines. The Combur-10 test was used to measure parameters that may affect urine color and hence the interpretation of the DOAC Dipstick result. DOAC Dipstick test results were positive in 21/23 patient urine samples at a plasma DOAC concentration of ≥30 ng/mL and in 2/23 patient urine samples at a plasma DOAC concentration of <30 ng/mL. Inter-observer agreement was above 90% for visual analysis of patient urine samples and was 100% for DOASENSE Reader analysis of patient urines and for analysis of control group urines and DOASENSE control urines. Abnormalities in urine color detected by the Combur-10 test did not affect the DOAC Dipstick results. DOAC Dipstick detects DOACs in urine at a plasma threshold of ≥30 ng/mL. Positive DOAC Dipstick results should be confirmed by measuring DOAC plasma concentration.

Thrombin Generation in Patients With Suspected Venous Thromboembolism.

Increasing number of patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism is referred to radiological departments for definitive diagnosis. A simple assay to exclude the diagnosis and avoid radiological examinations is needed. We have reported correlations between D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 measured in plasma and urine. To further develop an analysis based on urine, more understanding of thrombin generation in these patients is needed. The aim of this study was to compare ex vivo thrombin generation with in vivo markers in plasma and urine in patients with and without venous thromboembolism. Urine and blood samples were collected from patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. Commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were used to analyze the samples for in vivo thrombin generation. The ex vivo thrombogram parameters were measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram assay. Venous thromboembolism was verified with compression ultrasound of the lower extremity deep veins or with computer tomography of the pulmonary arteries. Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed in 117 of 591 patients, and they had significantly higher levels of urine and plasma prothromin fragment 1 + 2, D-dimer, lag time, time to peak, and endogenous thrombin potential when adjusted for covariates. The pattern of ex vivo and in vivo thrombin generation in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism was comparable when adjusted for covariates. Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in plasma and urine reflects thrombin generation ex vivo in the same manner. This indicates that urine may be an alternative substrate to quantify a procoagulant state.

D-Dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in urine and plasma in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism.

Increased levels of urine prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 was recently reported to be associated with imaging-verified venous thromboembolism. In this study we evaluated the relationship between plasma D-dimer and plasma and urine prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. Urine and blood samples were collected from patients with suspected pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis. The samples were analysed with commercially available ELISA kits. The diagnosis of venous thromboembolism was verified with contrast-enhanced computer tomography of the pulmonary arteries or lower extremity deep vein compression ultrasound and venography as appropriate. Venous thromboembolism was diagnosed in 150 of 720 patients. Significantly higher levels of plasma D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in plasma and urine were found in those with imaging-confirmed venous thromboembolism versus those without (P < 0.001). The correlation between the three biomarkers was statistically significant (range of rs values 0.45-0.65, P < 0.001). Plasma D-dimer had the highest diagnostic accuracy followed by prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in plasma. Further development of ELISA analyses for urine testing of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 may improve its diagnostic accuracy.

Risk factors for predicting venous thromboembolism in patients with nephrotic syndrome: focus on haemostasis-related parameters.

PURPOSE: The venous thromboembolic events (VTE) incidence is high in nephrotic syndrome (NS). We aimed to assess prospectively the risk of VTE in a large cohort of NS patients and to identify predictive factors for VTE, especially haemostasis-related parameters. METHODS: This is the prospective, observational study conducted in 256 adults with idiopathic NS. VTE were the study outcome. Clinical data, proteinuria, albuminuria, haemostasis and fibrinolysis parameters, and D-dimers were evaluated every 6 months. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 24 [IQR 12­72] months. VTE cumulative and rate incidence were 11 % and 4.4 per 100 patient-years. Baseline higher proteinuria,lower serum albumin, low antithrombin III activity, and,surprisingly, high ionized calcium were VTE independent predictors. Proteinuria and serum albumin cut-offs, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for VTE were 9.0 g/24 h (30 % PPV and 90 % NPV) and 1.5 g/dL (69 % PPV and 93 % NPV). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of VTE incidence of 4.4 per 100 patient-years found in this prospective study confirms the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome as a thromboembolism-generating condition. Severe and unremitting proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia,low antithrombin III activity, and, surprisingly, high ionized calcium are independent VTE predictors.

Urinary prothrombin fragment 1+2 in patients with venous thrombosis and myocardial infarction.

Patients with venous-thromboembolism (VTE) and myocardial infarction (MI) have elevated prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels. In patients with postoperative VTE, urinary F1+2 (uF1+2) was higher than in individuals without VTE. To explore the relationship between plasma and uF1+2 we performed a pilot study in patients with thrombotic events and healthy controls. In 40 patients with VTE or MI, and 25 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, F1+2 and D-dimer levels were measured in urine and plasma within 48 h after diagnosis. In addition, in all subjects renal function was assessed. Plasma and uF1+2 levels were positively correlated. Compared to controls, patients with VTE had higher levels of both plasma F1+2 (271 vs 160 pmol L(-1), p < 0.05) and uF1+2 levels (38 vs 28 pmol L(-1)), the latter, however, was not statistically significant. Patients with acute MI had similar F1+2 levels as controls in both plasma and urine. Differences in urinary F1+2 levels could not be attributed to differences in concentrations of creatinine or albumin in spot urine samples. Overall, D-dimer and F1+2 levels in urine were extremely low in all groups.