Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/prevenção & controle , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/terapia , Diálise Renal/métodos , África do Norte , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/diagnóstico , Humanos , Osteoclastos/patologia , Vitamina D/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a common benign bone tumor characterized by local osteolysis and high proclivity for recurrence. Surgical excision is the preferred treatment. However, simple wide resection may cause functional and cosmetic deformities of the skeleton. Currently, intralesional curettage with adjuvant therapy is a popular treatment. Bisphosphonates are recommended as an effective adjuvant treatment, and their antitumor effects have been proved in laboratory studies. During clinical treatment, intravenous and peroral administration of bisphosphonates has been attempted and has been successful in reducing the tumor recurrence rate. However, the use of bisphosphonates in GCTB adjuvant therapy requires additional study. Irrigation is a classic method for focal clearance after surgery. Therefore, we hypothesize that postoperative irrigation with bisphosphonates may be a safe and effective treatment for GCTB. The efficacy and safety of this method are worthy of further investigation.
Assuntos
Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Modelos BiológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Reports of recurrence following restructuring of primary giant cell tumor (GCT) defects using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cementation or allogeneic bone graft with and without adjuvants for intralesional curettage vary widely. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate efficacy of PMMA bone cementation and allogeneic bone grafting following intralesional curettage for GCT. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting GCT of bone treatment with PMMA cementation and/or bone grafting with or without adjuvant therapy following intralesional curettage of primary GCTs. Pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for local recurrence risks were calculated by fixed-effects methods. RESULTS: Of 1,690 relevant titles, 6 eligible studies (1,293 patients) spanning March 2008 to December 2011 were identified in published data. Treatment outcomes of PMMA-only (n = 374), bone graft-only (n = 436), PMMA with or without adjuvant (PMMA + adjuvant; n = 594), and bone graft filling with or without adjuvant (bone graft + adjuvant; n = 699) were compared. Bone graft-only patients exhibited higher recurrence rates than PMMA-treated patients (RR 2.09, 95% CI (1.64, 2.66), Overall effect: Z = 6.00; P <0.001), and bone graft + adjuvant patients exhibited higher recurrence rates than PMMA + adjuvant patients (RR 1.66, 95% CI (1.21, 2.28), Overall effect: Z = 3.15, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence was minimal in PMMA cementation patients, suggesting that PMMA is preferable for routine clinical restructuring in eligible GCT patients. Relationships between tumor characteristics, other modern adjuvants, and recurrence require further exploration.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Transplante Ósseo , Cimentação , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/prevenção & controle , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Polimetil Metacrilato/uso terapêutico , Cimentos Ósseos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Metanálise como Assunto , PrognósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: As osteoclast, giant cell tumors express calcitonin receptors. The aim of this paper is to assess treatment using salmon calcitonin after curettage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with giant cell tumor of the appendicular skeleton treated with a single protocol of calcitonin administration following curettage in order to assess the effectiveness of calcitonin in reducing the rate of local recurrence. RESULTS: The mean duration follow-up was 68 months. Thirteen patients (52%) had local recurrence. Eight of them were treated successfully after repeated curettage and calcitonin. Four patients had bone resection and one patient had curettage and cement filling. All patients with cavity left empty had ossified and the functional score as assessed by the MSTS score was 28.02/30. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the use of calcitonin as adjuvant is not effective and that filling agents are not required after curettage of giant cell tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Calcitonina/uso terapêutico , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/prevenção & controle , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Curetagem , Feminino , Tumor de Células Gigantes do Osso/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
SV40 DNA sequences have been found in human tumors, such as mesotheliomas, ependymomas, and bone tumors, suggesting that SV40 may be involved in their etiology. The FOS oncogene could play an important role in bone development because SV40 is able to induce FOS in cell culture. In this study, the presence of SV40 sequences, large T antigen (Tag), and FOS protein expression were investigated in 120 giant cell tumors (GCTs), moderately benign bone tumors that in some cases can progress to a malignant phenotype. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), using primers that amplify the RB1 pocket binding domain and the intron of Tag, was used to analyze GCT for the presence of SV40 DNA. Tag and FOS protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. SV40 sequences were found in 30/107 GCTs, and of these, 22/30 samples expressed Tag protein (73%) and 15/30 overexpressed the FOS oncogene (50%). FOS was undetectable in 77 SV40-negative GCTs. Sequence analysis of the amplified DNAs confirmed that the amplified sequences corresponded to SV40 DNA. The correlation between FOS overexpression and SV40-positive GCTs was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). These results show that SV40 DNA sequences and SV40 Tag are present in GCTs and might induce FOS activity. These data suggest that SV40 might play a role in the development and progression of some GCTs.