Down-regulation of SOCS6: an unfavorable prognostic factor for gastrointestinal stromal tumor proven by survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many studies reporting that down-regulation of SOCS6 plays vital roles in promoting progression of malignant tumors have been published. The present study was performed to evaluate whether SOCS6 was significantly associated with prognosis of GIST patients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was accomplished to evaluate the expression levels of SOCS6 among GIST patients. The impacts of SOCS6 expression on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of GIST patients were assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that the expression level of SOCS6 was significantly associated with tumor size (P=0.001). Then according to Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, low expression of SOCS6 was significantly correlated with worse OS and RFS of GIST patients. Ultimately, it was revealed by Cox proportional regression model analysis that low expression of SOCS6 was an independent predictive factor for OS and RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Low expression of SOCS6 was an independent prognostic factor for GIST, suggesting its potential as a novel biomarker predicting survival of GIST patients.

[Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumour and schwannoma: An unusual presentation in a patient without neurofibromatosis]. / Tumor del estroma gastrointestinal y schwannoma gástricos: una presentación inusual en un paciente sin neurofibromatosis.

The majority of gastric neoplasms are of epithelial type. Stromal tumours are the next most frequent and are most commonly gastrointestinal stromal tumours, followed by leiomyoma and schwannoma. We present an exceptional case of a patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumour with suspicion of residual gastric disease, which was diagnosed post-operatively as a schwannoma.

Cytological Findings of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-Derived Bone Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: Procedures for diagnosing bone tumors should be rapid and minimally invasive. Thus, cytological examinations are more useful for such purposes than histological examinations. In order to identify cytomorphological findings that could be used to diagnose bone metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), previous cases were reviewed. STUDY DESIGN: Cytological samples of 7 lesions from 4 patients with GIST-derived bone metastasis, which were obtained from 2001 to 2017 at the JFCR Cancer Institute Hospital, were reviewed. RESULTS: The metastasis of GIST to the bone was clinically suspected before the cytological and histological examinations in all cases since they all involved other metastatic lesion(s), and characteristic osteolytic lesions were detected on radiological images. Although various cell shapes were encountered, spindle cell proliferation was seen in all cytological samples. No pleomorphism was apparent. Characteristic nuclear findings were observed. All of the cases could be diagnosed as GIST-derived bone metastasis. CONCLUSION: GIST-derived bone metastasis can be diagnosed by examining cytological samples.

Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR is upregulated in an aggressive subgroup of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and mediates the establishment of gene-specific DNA methylation patterns.

Aberrant alterations of DNA methylation are common events in oncogenesis. The origin of cancer-associated epigenetic defects is of interest for mechanistic understanding of malignant transformation and-in the long run-therapeutic modulation of DNA methylation in a locus-specific manner. Given the ability of certain long noncoding RNAs to operate as an interface between DNA and the epigenetic modification machinery which can interact with DNA methyltransferases, we hypothesized-considering HOTAIR as an example-that this transcript may contribute to gene specificity of DNA methylation. Using gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs, n = 67) as a model, we confirmed upregulation of HOTAIR in tumors with high risk of recurrence and showed high abundance of the transcript in GIST cell lines. HOTAIR knockdown in GIST-T1 cells triggered transcriptional response of genes involved in the organization and disassembly of the extracellular matrix and, notably, induced global locus-specific alterations of DNA methylation patterns. Hypomethylation was induced at a total of 507 CpG sites, whereas 382 CpG dinucleotides underwent gain of methylation upon HOTAIR depletion. Importantly, orchestrated gain or loss of methylation at multiple individual CpG sites was shown for cancer-related DPP4, RASSF1, ALDH1A3, and other targets. Collectively, our data indicate that HOTAIR enables target specificity of DNA methylation in GIST and is capable of dual (hypo- and hypermethylation) regulation by a yet to be defined mechanism. The results further suggest the feasibility of manipulating DNA methylation in a targeted manner and are of interest in the context of epigenetic cancer therapy.

Simultaneous occurrence of splenic diffuse large B cell lymphoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Although the primary malignant spleen tumor is relatively rare, lymphoma is the most common splenic malignancy. It can have quite different clinical manifestations that usually lead to relatively poor outcomes, and thus early and accurate diagnosis are of utmost importance. CASE PRESENTATION: The present study reports a case of a 67-year-old female with high fever, abnormal spleen (diagnosed by PET/CT) and no obvious lymph node enlargement. After being subjected to splenectomy, the patient was diagnosed with splenic diffuse large B cell lymphoma coexisting with gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, splenic lymphoma accompanied by gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach is rarely reported. This case report discusses the diagnosis and case management of a patient referring to the existing literature.

[Gastrointestinal leiomyoma with interstitial cells of Cajal: mimicker of gastrointestinal stromal tumor].

Objective: To study clinical and pathologic characteristics of leiomyomas of the gastrointestinal tract, and to investigate the distribution characteristics of interstitial cells of Cajal ( ICCs ) in gastrointestinal leiomyomas. Methods: One hundred and forty-seven cases of leiomyomas of gastrointestinal tract were collected at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2012 to June 2017. Clinical and pathologic findings were analyzed, combined with immunohistochemistry, Alcian blue-osafranin staining and molecular study. Results: The age of patients ranged from 13-82 years with mean age of 52 years. Male to female ratio was about 1∶2. Histologically, all tumors were composed of ovoid to spindle cells arranged in short intersecting fascicles. All tumors were diffusely and strongly positive for smooth muscle antibodies, desmin and h-caldesmon by immunohistochemical staining. A prominent interspersed subpopulation of elongated/dendritic-like cells with CD117 and DOG1 positivity (accounting for 1% to 30% of all tumor cells) and negative for Alcian blue-osafranin staining was identified in all esophageal leiomyomas, 16 of 20 (80%) gastric leiomyomas and 3 of 12 small bowel leiomyomas, but none in colonic/rectal leiomyomas. Mutational analysis in 16 cases showed absence of mutation in exons 9, 11, 13 or 17 of C-KIT and exons 12 or 18 of PDGFRA. Conclusions: ICCs are identified in esophageal and gastric leiomyomas, as well as in small percentage of intestinal leiomyomas. Such findings may bring significant diagnostic pitfalls for misdiagnosis as gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Careful attention to the distribution of CD117 and DOG1 positive cells and molecular mutation analysis of C-KIT and PDGFRA may be necessary to establish the correct diagnosis.

Association of Dasatinib With Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Resistant to Imatinib.

Importance: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are life-threatening when metastatic or not amenable to surgical removal. In a few patients with advanced GISTs refractory to imatinib mesylate, treatment with sunitinib malate followed by regorafenib provides tumor control; however, additional active treatments are needed for most patients. Objective: To evaluate the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor objective response, and overall survival rates in patients with GISTs treated with dasatinib. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-arm clinical trial used a Bayesian design to enroll patients 13 years or older with measurable imatinib-refractory metastatic GISTs treated at 14 sarcoma referral centers from June 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009. A control group was not included. Patients were followed up for survival for a minimum of 5 years from date of enrollment. Tumor imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter. Tumor response was assessed by local site using the Choi criteria. Treatment was continued until tumor progression, unacceptable toxic effects after reduction in drug dose, or patient or physician decision. Archival tumor tissue was evaluated for expression of the proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (SRC), phosphorylated SRC (pSRC), and succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B (SDHB) proteins and for mutation in the V-Kit Hardy-Zuckerman 4 feline sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) genes. Data analysis was performed from May 19, 2017, through December 20, 2017. Interventions: Dasatinib, 70 mg orally twice daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 6-month PFS estimate using greater than 30% as evidence of an active drug and less than 10% as evidence of inactive treatment. Results: In this study, 50 patients were enrolled (median age, 60 years; age range, 19-78 years; 31 [62%] male and 19 [38%] female; 41 [82%] white), and 48 were evaluable for response. The estimated 6-month PFS rate was 29% in the overall population and 50% in a subset of 14 patients with pSRC in GISTs. Objective tumor response was observed in 25%, including 1 patient with an imatinib-resistant mutation in PDGFRA exon 18. Conclusions and Relevance: Dasatinib may have activity in a subset of patients with imatinib-resistant GISTs. Further study is needed to determine whether pSRC is a prognostic biomarker.

Four synchronous primary cancers of the aerodigestive tract and thyroid.

We report the case of a 60-year-old man with 4 concurrent primary cancers: thyroid papillary carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, gastric stromal tumor, and nodular goiter. A minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node resection played a major role in the diagnosis and resection of all primary tumors in the same sitting. Multiorgan primary cancers are not uncommon but pose challenges in diagnosis and treatment. The mechanism of development is unknown but exposure to the same carcinogens in multiple organs has been implicated.

[Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumors].

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics, diagnostic, differential diagnostic and prognostic features of malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor. Methods: Two cases of malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor were retrieved; the clinical and radiologic features, histomorphology, immunophenotype, molecular genetics and prognosis were analyzed and the relevant literature reviewed. Results: Case 1 was a 57-year-old male, presented with recurrent abdominal pain and melena. Pelvic imaging showed a circumscribed thickening of the wall of a small intestinal segment, and a malignant lymphoma was favored. Case 2 was a 24-year-old male, presented with recurrent small intestinal malignancy. Imaging demonstrated multiple masses in the peritoneal and pelvic cavities, and a malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor with multiple metastases was suspected. Grossly both tumors were located mainly in the muscularis propria of small intestine. Case 1 showed a single 5.5 cm tumor; and case 2 consisted of two tumors measuring 4 cm and 6 cm respectively. Microscopic examination of both tumors showed small round blue, but focally spindled or clear tumor cells in solid pattern. The tumor cells had scanty cytoplasm, indistinctive nucleoli and brisk mitoses. Osteoclast-like giant cells were dispersed within the stroma. In case 1 rosette-like and pseudo-papillary growth patterns were noted, and in case 2 there were variable-sized hemorrhagic cysts. By immunohistochemistry, both tumors showed strong and diffuse expression of SOX10 and S-100, and focal to diffuse expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56 or synaptophysin). Case 2 exhibited focal reactivity to pan-cytokeratin. Both tumors lacked expression of markers associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumor, smooth muscle tumor, melanoma (HMB45 or Melan A), dendritic cell tumor and Ewing sarcoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis demonstrated EWSR1 rearrangement in both tumors and the next generation sequencing confirmed EWSR1-ATF1 gene fusion in case 2. At follow-up of 16 months, case 1 was recurrence or metastasis free; whereas case 2 showed multiple recurrences and metastases within 19 months although stable disease was transiently achieved when treated with combinations of multidrug and targeted chemotherapy. Conclusions: Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with a predilection for small intestine. It has distinctive morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics and needs to be distinguished from other small blue round and spindle cell tumors that occur in the gut. Careful attentions to its characteristic histomorphology with the judicious use of immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics can help to distinguish this tumor from its many mimickers.

Gastric Spindle Cell Neuroendocrine Tumor Mimicking Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Unique Morphology and Diagnostic Pitfall.

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) with spindle cell morphology are extremely rare. We present a case of a 49-year-old female patient with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren's syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. She was initially thought to have a spindle cell gastrointestinal stromal tumor per histological studies of the fundic polypectomy samples. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were negative for CD117, and CD34, but positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin, and CD56 with a 6% Ki-67 index, consistent with a spindle cell-type well differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a gastric spindle cell neuroendocrine tumor in the English literature.

Surgical Pathology of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Practical Implications of Morphologic and Molecular Heterogeneity for Precision Medicine.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, exhibits diverse histologic and clinical manifestations. With its putative origin in the gastrointestinal pacemaker cell of Cajal, GIST can arise in association with any portion of the tubular gastrointestinal tract. Morphologically, GISTs are classified as spindled or epithelioid, though each of these subtypes encompasses a broad spectrum of microscopic appearances, many of which mimic other histologic entities. Despite this morphologic ambiguity, the diagnosis of GIST is aided in many cases by immunohistochemical detection of KIT (CD117) or DOG1 expression. The natural history of GIST ranges from that of a tumor cured by surgical resection to that of a locally advanced or even widely metastatic, and ultimately fatal, disease. This clinicopathologic heterogeneity is paralleled by an underlying molecular diversity: the majority of GISTs are associated with spontaneous activating mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, or BRAF, while additional subsets are driven by genetic lesions-often inherited-of NF1 or components of the succinate dehydrogenase enzymatic complex. Specific gene mutations correlate with particular anatomic or morphologic characteristics and, in turn, with distinct clinical behaviors. Therefore, prognostication and treatment are increasingly dictated not only by morphologic clues, but also by accompanying molecular genetic features. In this review, we provide a comprehensive description of the heterogenous molecular underpinnings of GIST, including implications for the practicing pathologist with regard to morphologic identification, immunohistochemical diagnosis, and clinical management.

The prognostic significance of ING4 expression on gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors by immunohistochemistry.

OBJECTIVE: Inhibitor of growth 4 (ING4) is a novel tumor suppressor gene that is reported to be down-regulated in various tumors including gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originated from different locations, recently. Herein, we aimed to evaluate ING4 expression and its prognostic significance on gastric GISTs in order to add further data to the current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ING4 was evaluated in samples of gastric GISTs from 62 patients, by immunohistochemistry. The association between ING4 expression and clinicopathological features related with prognosis and overall survival (OS) were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: There was statistically significant inverse correlation between ING4 expression and risk groups according to both NIH and AFIP, Ki67 index, tumor diameter, and mitotic count by univarite analysis (p=0.000, p=0.000, p=0.08, p=0.01, and p=0.028, respectively). The negative association between ING4 expression and risk groups according to both NIH (p=0.002, ß=-0.263, t=-3.166) and AFIP (p=0.016, ß=-0.244, t=-2.492) was supported by multivariate analysis. There was statistically significant direct correlation between low levels of ING4 expression and shorter OS by univariate (p=0.000) and multivariate analysis (p=0.000, ß=0.769, t=9.798), as well as Kaplan-Meier method (p=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The low ING4 expression level was found to be related with unfavorable prognosis. Thus, we suggest that loss of ING4 expression might play a role in the progression of GISTs and might be used as a potential prognostic tool. Additionally, this is the first study that has evaluated the association of ING4 expression on gastric GISTs, to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we claim that more comprehensive future studies including higher number of patients and longer follow-up might clarify the potential role of ING4 on pathogenesis and prognosis of GISTs. KEY WORDS: Clinicopathological features, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, ING4, Immunohistochemistry.

GIST Manifesting as a Retroperitoneal Tumor: Clinicopathologic Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Genetic Study of 112 Cases.

Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) occur in the tubular gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but some present apparently outside the GI tract. In this study, we analyzed 112 GISTs located in the retroperitoneum. These tumors occurred in 55 women and 57 men with a median age of 65 years (range: 21 to 89 y). On the basis of clinically or histologically detected connections to GI tract, 15 tumors were considered likely of gastric, 9 duodenal, and 13 of small intestinal origin. The remaining cases were categorized by location as peripancreatic (n=25), pelvic (n=11), mesenteric (n=4), and of unspecified/miscellaneous sites (n=35). The tumors varied in size 3 to 35 cm (median, 15 cm) and by mitotic rate per 5 mm, 0 to >100 (median, 10). Histologically the tumors apparently arising outside the GI tract had features of intestinal (n=41) and gastric GISTs (n=25); 9 cases had indeterminate histology. The histologic variants included spindled, epithelioid, vacuolated, nested, and myxoid potentially simulating other tumors such as liposarcoma and solitary fibrous tumor. Most GISTs were KIT-positive (106/112 cases), and the remaining 6 tumors were DOG1/Ano1-positive. Five cases showed focal nuclear positivity for MDM2. KIT mutations were detected in 42/59 cases, and PDGFRA mutations in 4/16 KIT wild-type and 3/5 of the KIT-negative tumors analyzed. One pelvic retroperitoneal GIST was succinate dehydrogenase deficient. All 79 patients were dead at last follow-up with a median survival of 14 months, with few survivals >5 years. Only operable versus inoperable tumor was a statistically favorable factor in univariate analysis (P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, mitotic rate >50/5 mm was significant for a shorter survival (hazard ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-16.8; P<0.01). Histologic and clinicopathologic similarity of extragastrointestinal retroperitoneal GISTs with GISTs of GI tract suggests their GI tract origin. Potentially overlapping features between GIST and other retroperitoneal tumors necessitate use of multiple diagnostic markers and molecular genetic studies.

Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (GNET) is an extremely rare entity that was first described by Zambrano et al. in 2003 as "Clear cell sarcoma-like tumor of the gastrointestinal tract". It shares some of the histological features of clear cell sarcoma (CCS) but lacks the immunohistochemical reactivity for melanocytic markers. We report a case of GNET that was initially misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Recognizing this entity is important to avoid misdiagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: A case of an 18-year-old male presented with a small intestinal tumor. Histologically it was characterized by polygonal cells arranged in pseudoalveolar pattern and situated in the muscularis propria. Scattered osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells were also noted. The neoplastic cells were positive for S-100 protein and negative for HMB-45, Melan A, smooth muscle actin, desmin and CD117. EWSR1 gene rearrangement was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The patient returned with recurrence after 36 months' management by surgical resection and died one year later. CONCLUSIONS: GNET can be mistaken histologically for other non-epithelial gastrointestinal tumors. Awareness of its existence and diagnostic criteria by the pathologist is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis, particularly as GIST, CCS or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST).

Clinicopathological and molecular features of a large cohort of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and review of the literature: BRAF mutations in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs are rare events.

In KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors (wt-GISTs), BRAF mutations are regarded as alternative pathogenic events driving tumorigenesis. In our study, we aimed at analyzing a large cohort (n=444) of GISTs for BRAF mutations using molecular and immunohistochemical methods. More than 3000 GIST samples from caucasian patients were available in our GIST and Sarcoma Registry NRW. Of these, we selected 172 wt-GISTs to evaluate the frequency of BRAF mutations. Furthermore, 272 GISTs with a representative KIT and PDGFRA mutational status were selected. BRAF mutational status was evaluated by high-resolution melting analysis, Sanger sequencing, and VE1 immunohistochemistry. A BRAF mutation (p.V600E) was found in 7 cases (3.9%) of the wt-GIST cohort. In 2 cases, multiple synchronous tumors harbored the same somatic BRAF mutation. VE1 immunohistochemical staining had a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 97.5% to detect BRAF p.V600E mutations. Analyzing our cases and the cases reported in the literature (n=37), the percentage of intermediate and high-risk BRAF-mutated wt-GISTs (17/31; 54.8%) was comparable to that recorded for large GIST cohorts irrespective of the mutational status. BRAF mutations are rare events in wt-GISTs, and VE1 immunohistochemistry appears to be a valuable pre-screening tool for the detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations. BRAF mutations in GISTs do not seem to have a prognostic value per se. However, as BRAF inhibition represents a therapeutic option to control disease, we suggest the assessment of the BRAF mutational status, especially in the setting of advanced GIST disease.

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of DOG1 Expression on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review our archives in order to evaluate both the diagnostic and prognostic significance of DOG1 on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and add further insight about those issues to the current literature including some conflicting results. MATERIAL AND METHOD: DOG1 was evaluated in 100 cases of GISTs, immunohistochemically. Immunostaining index was counted for each antibody by using both the intensity and extent of staining. The association between immunostaining index of DOG1 and CD117, CD34, SMA desmin, S-100, and Ki-67 index and clinicopathological features were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety cases were positive for DOG1, and 89 were positive for CD117. All CD117-negative tumors were positive for DOG1. High-risk group was directly correlated with tumor diameter, cellularity, necrosis, nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic count and Ki-67 index, by univariate analysis. The association between high-risk group and tumor diameter, mitotic count, and Ki-67 index was proved by multivariate analysis. Immunostaining index of DOG1, Ki-67 index, mitotic count, ulceration and hemorrhage were inversely correlated with overall survival by univariate analysis. The adverse impact of DOG1 ISI and mitotic count on overall survival were supported by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: DOG1 positivity was detected in most of GISTs and all in CD117-negative cases as a result underlining its diagnostic utility. Additionally, DOG1 overexpression was related with adverse prognosis. Thus, we suggest that immunostaining index of DOG1 should routinely be used while diagnosing GIST, and DOG1 might be considered as a potential prognostic tool and a target for novel therapies.

Expression of neural cell adhesion molecule L1 (CD171) in neuroectodermal and other tumors: An immunohistochemical study of 5155 tumors and critical evaluation of CD171 prognostic value in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

The neural cell adhesion molecule L1 (CD171) is a multidomain type 1 membrane glycoprotein of the immunoglobulin superfamily important in the nervous system development, kidney morphogenesis, and maintenance of the immune system. Recent studies reported CD171 expression being associated with adverse clinical outcome in different types of cancer and there has been a growing interest in targeting this cell membrane molecule on neoplastic cells by chimeric antigen receptor redirected T lymphocytes or specific antibodies. Nevertheless, conflicting results regarding the prognostic value of CD171 expression in renal cell carcinomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors were published. In this study, CD171 expression was immunohistochemically analyzed in 5155 epithelial, mesenchymal, melanocytic, and lymphohematopoietic tumors to assess its utility in diagnostic pathology and to pinpoint potential targets for CD171-targeting therapy. A newly developed anti-CD171 rabbit monoclonal antibody, clone 014, was selected from the panel of commercially available CD171 antibodies. Immunohistochemistry was performed using Leica Bond Max automation and multitumor blocks containing up to 60 tumor samples. CD171 was constitutively and strongly expressed in neuroectodermal tumors such as schwannoma, neuroblastoma, and paraganglioma, whereas other mesenchymal tumors including schwannoma mimics showed only rarely CD171 positivity. Frequent CD171-expression was also detected in ovarian serous carcinoma, malignant mesothelioma, and testicular embryonal carcinoma. CD171 immunohistochemistry may have some role in immunophenotypic differential diagnosis of neurogenic tumors and pinpointing potential candidates for anti-CD171 therapy. Though, because of its rare expression and lack of predictive value, CD171 is neither a diagnostic nor prognostic marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.