Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 138
Filtrar
1.
Urol Int ; 106(1): 63-74, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34130300

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to summarize the current literature on the assessment and treatment of radiation urethritis and cystitis (RUC) for the development of an evidenced-based management algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched by a multidisciplinary group of experts in January 2021. RESULTS: In total, 48 publications were identified. Three different types of RUC can be observed in clinical practice: inflammation-predominant, bleeding-predominant, and the combination of inflammation- and bleeding-RUC. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of RUC. Inflammation-predominant RUC should be treated symptomatically based on the existence of bothersome storage or voiding lower urinary tract symptom as well as on pain. When bleeding-predominant RUC has occurred, hydration and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) should be used first and, if HOT is not available, oral drugs instead (sodium pentosane polysulfate, aminocaproic acid, immunokine WF 10, conjugated estrogene, or pentoxifylline + vitamin E). If local bleeding persists, focal therapy of bleeding vessels with a laser or electrocoagulation is indicated. In case of generalized bleeding, intravesical installation should be initiated (formalin, aluminium salts, and hyaluronic acid/chondroitin). Vessel embolization is a less invasive treatment with potentially less complications and good clinical outcomes. Open- or robot-assisted surgery is indicated in patients with permanent, life-threatening bleeding, or fistulae. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of RUC, if not self-limiting, should be done according to the type of RUC and in a stepwise approach. Conservative/medical treatment (oral and topic agents) should primarily be used before invasive (transurethral) treatments.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Cistite/diagnóstico , Cistite/terapia , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/terapia , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia , Doença Aguda , Doença Crônica , Humanos
2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 35(1): 312-320, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33316119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Proliferative urethritis (PU) is an uncommon inflammatory and infiltrative disease of the urethra in female dogs, often associated with urinary tract infection (UTI). It typically presents with evidence of urethral obstruction (UO). OBJECTIVES: Identify clinical features in dogs with PU and determine outcome after different treatment modalities. ANIMALS: Eleven client-owned dogs. METHODS: Medical records of dogs with histopathologic diagnosis of PU from 2011 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated, including information on clinical pathology, imaging, and histopathology. Outcomes of various treatment modalities were recorded and compared. Long-term urethral patency (>6 months) was considered treatment success. RESULTS: All dogs were female and presented with UO. Eight (73%) had a history of UTI. Ten of 11 survived to discharge and were used for long-term data collection. Seven of 10 (70%) were treated using an effacement procedure (balloon dilatation [BD], stent, or both) and 6/7 (86%) achieved long-term urethral patency (>6 months). Seven of 10 had UO recurrence after their first procedure, including 3/3 (100%) that did not have effacement and 4/7 that did (57%), at a median of 101 days and 687 days, respectively. After effacement, the duration of patency was longer for those treated using a stent than BD alone (median, 843 days and 452 days, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Proliferative urethritis is a recurrent disease often associated with UTI. The best outcome of long-term urethral patency occurred after lesion effacement, either by BD or stenting. Future prospective studies should determine the impact of immunosuppressive treatment.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão , Obstrução Uretral , Uretrite , Animais , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Doenças do Cão/terapia , Cães , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução Uretral/terapia , Obstrução Uretral/veterinária , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia , Uretrite/veterinária
3.
Epidemiol. serv. saúde ; 30(spe1): e2020633, 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1154152

RESUMO

Este artigo aborda as infecções que causam corrimento uretral, tema que compõe o Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Atenção Integral às Pessoas com Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis, publicado pelo Ministério da Saúde do Brasil em 2020. Tal documento foi elaborado com base em evidências científicas e validado em discussões com especialistas. As uretrites, quando não tratadas de maneira correta, ou quando o microrganismo desenvolve resistência ao tratamento empregado, podem causar danos graves e até irreversíveis à saúde. Os níveis de resistência antimicrobiana que esses agentes têm desenvolvido são considerados uma emergência global em saúde pública. Neste artigo, são apresentados aspectos epidemiológicos e clínicos, recomendações sobre diagnóstico e tratamento e estratégias para as ações de vigilância, prevenção e controle das infecções que causam corrimento uretral, com a finalidade de contribuir com gestores e profissionais de saúde para a qualificação da assistência.


This article approach infections that cause urethral discharge, theme which is part of the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines for Comprehensive Care for People with Sexually Transmitted Infections, published by the Ministry of Health of Brazil in 2020. These guidelines were prepared based on scientific evidence and validated in discussions with experts. When urethritis is not treated correctly, or when the microorganism develops antimicrobial resistance, it can cause serious and even irreversible health damage. It is noteworthy that the high levels of antimicrobial resistance developed by pathogens that causes urethritis comprises a global emergency in public health. This article presents epidemiological and clinical aspects, recommendations on diagnostic and treatment, and strategies for surveillance, prevention and control actions of infections that cause urethral discharge, with the purpose of contributing with managers and health professionals to care qualification.


El artículo trata de las infecciones que causan secreción uretral, tema que hace parte del Protocolo Clínico y Directrices Terapéuticas para Atención Integral a Personas con Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual, publicado por el Ministerio de Salud de Brasil en 2020. Dicho documento se elaboró con base en evidencias científicas y se validó en discusiones con expertos. Las uretritis, cuando no tratadas correctamente o cuando el microorganismo desarrolla resistencia al tratamiento, puede ocasionar daños graves a la salud. Los niveles de resistencia antimicrobiana que estos agentes desarrollan son considerados una emergencia de salud pública. En este artículo, se presentan aspectos epidemiológicos y clínicos, recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento y estrategias para acciones de monitoreo epidemiológico, prevención y control de las infecciones que causan secreción uretral, a fin de contribuir con gestores y personal de salud para la cualificación de la asistencia.


Assuntos
Humanos , Uretrite/terapia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Brasil/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/terapia , Gonorreia/terapia
4.
J Pediatr Urol ; 16(5): 690-699, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762951

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: idiopathic hemorrhagic urethritis of childhood (IHU) is uncommon. Data about the disease are limited. There are no available protocols for diagnosis, treatment, or follow-up and prognostic factors are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aim to review the available data about IHU, to organize and to synthesize information, to facilitate clinical choices and the establishment of future research protocols. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive review of the literature. RESULTS: The disease typically affects peri-pubertal boys. A third evolve to chronic disease and circa 15% develop urethral stenoses. Voiding dysfunction is frequent. Acute scrotum secondary to orchiepididymitis may occur. Meatal stenosis and hypospadias are more frequent than in the general population. Diagnosis is clinical (urethrorrhagia ± dysuria). Complementary exams are mostly used for differential diagnosis. Indications for cystoscopy are controversial. Bulbar urethral inflammation with fibrinous "membranes" are typical. Treatment is controversial and mostly expectant. Topical steroids and indwelling catheterization are the most successful for severe or recalcitrant cases (summary table). CONCLUSION: IHU turns into a chronic condition in a significant proportion of the cases and associates to a low quality of life. Urethral stenosis is the most common complication. Indications for diagnostic cystoscopy, prolonged catheterization, and steroid prescription need to be better defined. Clinical protocols are deeply needed.


Assuntos
Estreitamento Uretral , Uretrite , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Uretra , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia
5.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health ; 46(2): 132-138, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31722934

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (Mgen) causes non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) and is believed to cause pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). High rates of macrolide resistance are well documented globally for Mgen. In Brighton, patients with NGU and PID are tested for Mgen and test of cure (TOC) offered post-treatment. METHODS: Demographic, clinical and treatment history data were collected over a 12-month period for all Mgen-positive patients in a Brighton-based genitourinary clinic. RESULTS: There were 114 patients with Mgen. 18% (61/339) of men with NGU and 9% (15/160) of women with PID had Mgen. 62/114 (54%) returned for first test TOC 4 weeks after treatment. 27/62 (44%) had a positive TOC; 25/27 (92.6%) had received azithromycin first line (500 mg stat then 250 mg OD for 4 days), 1/27 (3.7%) had received moxifloxacin first line (400 mg OD for 14 days) and 1/27 (3.7%) had received doxycycline first line (100 mg BD for 7 days). 20/27 (74%) returned for a second TOC 4 weeks later. 5/20 (25%) patients were positive on second TOC; 3/5 (60%) had received azithromycin second line and 2/5 (40%) had received moxifloxacin second line. Patients were more likely to have a positive TOC if they were at risk of reinfection (9/27 positive TOC vs 3/35 negative TOC; p=0.02). Patients given moxifloxacin were more likely to have a negative TOC (1/27 positive TOC vs 9/35 negative TOC; p=0.03) than those who received other antibiotic regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failure rates for Mgen following azithromycin use are substantial, raising concerns regarding resistance. However, reinfection risk may contribute, suggesting a requirement for improved public awareness and clinician knowledge.


Assuntos
Infecções por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Mycoplasma genitalium/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretrite/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Moxifloxacina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Mycoplasma genitalium/patogenicidade , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/normas , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Uretrite/epidemiologia , Uretrite/terapia
7.
Pan Afr Med J ; 32: 201, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31312313

RESUMO

Naphthalene is commonly used in Ghana as an insecticide and there have been occasional ingestion unintentionally ingestion in children. Naphthalene use has been associated with intravascular haemolysis especially in patients with glucose-6-phoshate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency but its unorthodox use for the treatment of urethritis in a young man and its associated acute kidney injury has not been described in Ghana. This case report bring to fore the indiscriminate use of complementary medicines and the multiple adverse effects on the kidneys after the ingestion of a combination of naphthalene, alcohol and aluminium sulphate (Alum) as a treatment for urethritis upon a friend's suggestion requiring intermittent haemodialysis but recovered completely of his renal functions. Naphthalene ingestion can cause acute tubular necrosis from haemoglobinuria and timely interventions are necessary to restore renal and maintain good renal functions.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Naftalenos/intoxicação , Diálise Renal/métodos , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Gana , Humanos , Masculino , Uretrite/terapia
8.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 25(9): 802-810, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32233207

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the status quo of the diagnosis and treatment of male urethritis (MU) in urology and andrology. METHODS: According to The Guidelines for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (2017), we designed 27 questions on the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of MU. Using these questions, we conducted a questionnaire investigation among urological, andrological and other relevant clinicians with different professional titles, followed by an analysis of the compliance of the doctors to the Guidelines. RESULTS: Totally, 116 valid questionnaires were collected from 86 urological, 28 andrological and 2 other relevant doctors, including 22 professors, 36 associate professors, 40 attending doctors and 16 resident doctors. MU was found mostly in those aged 20-40 years and more than half of the patients had a history of unclean sex, gonococcal urethritis significantly less prevalent than non-gonococcal, with Ureaplasma urealyticum as the most common pathogen of non-gonococcal urethritis. As for the compliance to the Guidelines in the diagnosis of MU, 22.73% of the professors, 16.67% of the associate professors, 15.00% of the attending doctors and 12.50% of the resident doctors examined the eyes, mouth and perianus (P > 0.05), 40.91% of the professors, 58.33% of the associate professors, 40.00% of the attending doctors and 37.50% of the resident doctors conducted HIV and syphilis screening (P > 0.05), and 86.36% of the professors, 77.78% of the associate professors, 70.00% of the attending doctors and 75.00% of the resident doctors performed genital mycoplasma screening (P > 0.05). Concerning the treatment of MU, 50.00% of the professors, 47.22% of the associate professors, 22.50% of the attending doctors and 43.75% of the resident doctors used anti-Chlamydia trachomatis drugs for gonococcal urethritis (P > 0.05), 0.00% of the professors, 11.11% of the associate professors, 5.00% of the attending doctors and 31.25% of the resident doctors prescribed 1g single-dose oral azithromycin for non-gonococcal urethritis (P < 0.05), 13.64% of the professors, 33.33% of the associate professors, 17.50% of the attending doctors and 6.25% of the resident doctors medicated persistent or recurrent non-gonococcal urethritis for >4 weeks (P > 0.05), 63.64% of the professors, 83.33% of the associate professors, 57.50% of the attending doctors and 62.50% of the resident doctors treated asymptomatic trachomatis and mycoplasma infections according to the proposed medication in the Guidelines (P > 0.05). As regards the results of treatment, the cure rate of gonococcal urethritis was 100.00% by professors, 97.22% by associate professors, 95.00% by attending doctors and 81.25% by resident doctors (P > 0.05), and that of non-gonococcal urethritis was 86.36% by professors, 61.11% by associate professors, 62.50% by attending doctors and 37.50% by resident doctors (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Urological and andrological clinicians do not strictly follow the Guidelines in the diagnosis and treatment of male urethritis. There are significant differences in the dosing of azithromycin and results of treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis among doctors with different professional titles, but not in the other aspects.


Assuntos
Infecções por Ureaplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Uretrite/tratamento farmacológico , Uretrite/terapia , Adulto , Andrologia , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Mycoplasma genitalium , Inquéritos e Questionários , Uretrite/microbiologia , Urologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(12): 768-773, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28876299

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are a key population, particularly vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV, but there are limited data on health programs targeting MSM in Africa. This study aims to describe the utilization of nongovernmental organization-supported sexual health services for MSM at 2 public sector health facilities in Johannesburg, South Africa. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed routine data over the period of January 2014 to June 2016. We report on service utilization for STI syndromes, HIV testing, and the antiretroviral therapy (ART) program. RESULTS: Some 5796 men visited the facilities. Seven thousand one hundred eighty-eight STI episodes were managed, 68.2% (4903 episodes) of which were classified as male urethritis and 9.8% (704 episodes) as genital ulcers. Positivity yield for first-time HIV tests was 38.0% (205 positive test results) in MSM, compared with 14.1% (471 positive test results) in other men. At the end of the study, there were 1090 clients on ART, and 2-year retention was 82% (95% confidence interval, 78%-85%). There was no difference in retention between MSM and other men (P = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to show that sexual health services targeting MSM in Africa have managed to attract MSM and other men in need of STI and HIV care. The observed high HIV testing yield among MSM illustrates the relevance of MSM-focused services in the South African public health sector, and the good retention on ART demonstrates that high-quality care can be provided to MSM in our setting.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Adulto , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Instalações de Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Comportamento Sexual , Saúde Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Uretrite/epidemiologia , Uretrite/terapia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Aktuelle Urol ; 48(1): 61-63, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403494

RESUMO

Urethritis posterior is a possible cause of asymptomatic haematuria in prepubescent boys. It is a benign lesion of the posterior urethra and its cardinal symptoms are blood spots in the underwear without any laboratory or radiologic findings. Urethrocystoscopy is the only way to confirm the diagnosis, but has been subject to criticism as it is associated with a high risk of strictures. It is advisable to adopt a "wait and see" strategy because urethritis posterior usually heals spontaneously over time. This condition is most likely caused by detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, since behavioural intervention with biofeedback therapy offers good treatment results.


Assuntos
Hematúria/etiologia , Criança , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Hematúria/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia , Urografia , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/terapia , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapia
11.
Sex Transm Dis ; 44(2): 126-130, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28079749

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To determine if female partners of men with pathogen-negative non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) are at risk of genital infection. METHODS: Secondary data analysis using health records from a large sexually transmitted disease clinic in Melbourne of 1710 men and their female partners attending on the same day from January 2006 to April 2015. Proportions of female partners with symptoms suggesting genital infection or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) were determined for: (1) men with NGU and no Chlamydia trachomatis or Mycoplasma genitalium (referred to as pathogen-negative NGU) (n = 91); 2) men with urethral C. trachomatis (n = 176); 3) men with urethral M. genitalium (n = 26); and 4) asymptomatic men (n = 652). RESULTS: Female partners of men with pathogen-negative NGU experienced deep pelvic pain (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.4), post coital bleeding (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.9), and dysuria (AOR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6-8.6) more commonly and were diagnosed with PID more commonly (AOR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-11.3) than the female partners of asymptomatic men. Pelvic inflammatory disease was not more likely to be diagnosed in the female partners of men with genital warts (AOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-4.4) or candidiasis (AOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.4-3.5) than the female partners of asymptomatic men. The female partners of men with chlamydia experienced post coital bleeding more (AOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.6) and were more likely to be diagnosed with PID (AOR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.0). CONCLUSIONS: The female partners of men with pathogen-negative NGU may be at increased risk of genital infection, even if a recognised pathogen is not identified in the man.


Assuntos
Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/diagnóstico , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Disuria , Feminino , Heterossexualidade , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/terapia , Parceiros Sexuais , Uretrite/terapia , Adulto Jovem
13.
J Pediatr Urol ; 12(1): 35.e1-5, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26257028

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Williams and Mikhael (1971) described idiopathic urethritis (IU) as a self-limiting condition that affects boys aged 5-15 years, with symptoms of urethrorrhagia, dysuria and haematuria. However, a proportion of boys will remain symptomatic for several years, and may develop urethral stricture (Poch et al., 2007; Palagiri et al., 2003). There is no universally effective treatment for IU, although various strategies have been employed. OBJECTIVE: To review the presentation and long-term outcomes of boys with IU, and present the efficacy of management strategies that have been utilised. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of all boys with IU. It was based on clinical and cystoscopic findings for presentation, medical history, management and clinical progress. RESULTS: Fifty-four boys were included, with a median age of 11 years (range 5-15 years) at presentation. The median duration of symptoms was 18 months (range 2-132 months). The median follow-up was 18.5 months (range 1-120 months). Seven (13.0%) boys had early urethral stricture at initial cystourethroscopy, and one (1.9%) developed stricture during follow-up. Thirty-six boys (66.7%) had previous circumcision and four (7.4%) had meatal stenosis. Eight (14.8%) had previous hypospadias repair. CONCLUSION: Whilst 50% of boys with IU do not require any specific treatment, those with severe/unremitting symptoms may benefit from a trial of urethral steroids or short-term urethral catheterisation. The mechanisms of benefit from these modalities are unclear and they require further evaluation.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Uretrite/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cistoscopia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/etiologia
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61 Suppl 8: S763-9, 2015 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602615

RESUMO

Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis are well-documented urethral pathogens, and the literature supporting Mycoplasma genitalium as an etiology of urethritis is growing. Trichomonas vaginalis and viral pathogens (herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 and adenovirus) can cause urethritis, particularly in specific subpopulations. New data are emerging regarding the potential role of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria in urethritis, although results are inconsistent regarding the pathogenic role of Ureaplasma urealyticum in men. Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma parvum do not appear to be pathogens. Men with suspected urethritis should undergo evaluation to confirm urethral inflammation and etiologic cause. Although nucleic acid amplification testing would detect N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis (or T. vaginalis if utilized), there is no US Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical test for M. genitalium available in the United States at this time. The varied etiologies of urethritis and lack of diagnostic options for some organisms present treatment challenges in the clinical setting.


Assuntos
Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/terapia , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/terapia , Mycoplasma genitalium/genética , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Ureaplasma urealyticum/genética , Uretrite/etiologia , Uretrite/microbiologia
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61 Suppl 8: S770-3, 2015 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602616

RESUMO

In April 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened an advisory group to assist in development of the 2015 CDC sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) treatment guidelines. The advisory group examined recent abstracts and published literature addressing the diagnosis and management of sexually transmitted infections. This article summarizes the key questions, evidence, and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of epididymitis that were considered in preparation of the 2015 CDC STD treatment guidelines.


Assuntos
Epididimite , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Chlamydia/isolamento & purificação , Epididimite/diagnóstico , Epididimite/terapia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Gonorreia/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/microbiologia , Estados Unidos , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/microbiologia , Uretrite/terapia
16.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 64(RR-03): 1-137, 2015 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042815

RESUMO

These guidelines for the treatment of persons who have or are at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were updated by CDC after consultation with a group of professionals knowledgeable in the field of STDs who met in Atlanta on April 30-May 2, 2013. The information in this report updates the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2010 (MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59 [No. RR-12]). These updated guidelines discuss 1) alternative treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 2) the use of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis; 3) alternative treatment options for genital warts; 4) the role of Mycoplasma genitalium in urethritis/cervicitis and treatment-related implications; 5) updated HPV vaccine recommendations and counseling messages; 6) the management of persons who are transgender; 7) annual testing for hepatitis C in persons with HIV infection; 8) updated recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of urethritis; and 9) retesting to detect repeat infection. Physicians and other health-care providers can use these guidelines to assist in the prevention and treatment of STDs.


Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Terapias Complementares , Condiloma Acuminado/terapia , Aconselhamento , Feminino , Gonorreia/terapia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Hepatite C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Mycoplasma genitalium/patogenicidade , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Recidiva , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Pessoas Transgênero , Tricomoníase/diagnóstico , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/microbiologia , Uretrite/terapia , Cervicite Uterina/microbiologia , Cervicite Uterina/terapia
17.
Hautarzt ; 66(1): 12-8, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25410827

RESUMO

For many years an increase in cases of urethritis has been observed in western Europe. In order to be able to combat this continuous rise, the perception of sexually transmitted diseases must be promoted, the clarification and screening must be intensified and therapy must be rapidly and correctly carried out. In addition to the commonest pathogens causing urethritis, namely chlamydia and gonococci, many other pathogenic microbes must be taken into consideration in the diagnostics. With respect to therapy, apart from the increasing resistance formation of Mycoplasma genitalium, the decreasing effectiveness of standard forms of treatment of other microbes must be emphasized. For chronic and recurrent urethritis in particular a broad clarification of the pathogen should be carried out to enable targeted treatment and also partner treatment. Priority must again be given to primary prevention.


Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/terapia , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Uretrite/terapia , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/terapia , Humanos
18.
Urologiia ; (6): 40-46, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28247679

RESUMO

The article shows the high efficacy of the additional local use of the drug Miramistin in combination therapy of chronic urethritis, associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine, patients were assigned to the study group (n=110) treated with conventional therapy and Miramistin, and the comparison group (n=40) treated with conventional therapy only. The between-group comparison of treatment effectiveness was carried out by matching results of the etiological healing, the changes of the endoscopic picture of the urethra, and basic clinical manifestations of STI: the degree of inflammatory reaction of urethral mucous membrane, dysuria, pain and sexual syndrome.


Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Uretrite , Disuria/etiologia , Humanos , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/complicações , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/terapia , Uretra , Uretrite/complicações , Uretrite/terapia
19.
Turk J Pediatr ; 57(4): 380-4, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27186701

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features and long-term outcome of the patients who were treated at our institution for idiopathic urethrorrhagia. The data of 10 male patients, who underwent cystoscopy between October 2010 and March 2013 due to urethrorrhagia, were evaluated retrospectively. Ten male patients aged between 8 and 16 years at first submission. Four patients (40%) had low voiding frequency (2-3 per day). Three of the four patients had abnormal uroflowmetry/EMG findings. Cystoscopy was done in all patients which revealed bulbar urethral inflammation and hemorrhage in all. Symptoms were not resolved on three of the patients who were under observation, having symptoms on average for 29.6±10.5 months. Complete resolution developed in the other seven patients. Six of the patients` symptoms were resolved soon after cystoscopy. In the patients' with or without normal uroflowmetry/EMG findings urethrorrhagia resolution rates were 86% and 33%, respectively. In the evaluation of urethrorrhagia; detailed history taking, basic laboratory investigation and cystoscopy are enough. The typical patients may be treated expectantly. In our opinion, it seems that dysfunctional voiding and infrequent voiding might cause delayed remission and/or recurrence of urethrorrhagia. Even though, it does not effect the treatment, in the persistent cases, confirmation of diagnosis by cystoscopy helps to lessen the anxiety of the family and might decrease the use of many unnecessary diagnostic tools in the long term follow ups.


Assuntos
Hematúria/etiologia , Uretra/patologia , Uretrite/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Criança , Cistoscopia , Hematúria/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Uretrite/terapia
20.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD002843, 2013 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24092529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Partner notification (PN) is the process whereby sexual partners of an index patient are informed of their exposure to a sexually transmitted infection (STI) and the need to obtain treatment. For the person (index patient) with a curable STI, PN aims to eradicate infection and prevent re-infection. For sexual partners, PN aims to identify and treat undiagnosed STIs. At the level of sexual networks and populations, the aim of PN is to interrupt chains of STI transmission. For people with viral STI, PN aims to identify undiagnosed infections, which can facilitate access for their sexual partners to treatment and help prevent transmission. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of different PN strategies in people with STI, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. SEARCH METHODS: We searched electronic databases (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE) without language restrictions. We scanned reference lists of potential studies and previous reviews and contacted experts in the field. We searched three trial registries. We conducted the most recent search on 31 August 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing two or more PN strategies. Four main PN strategies were included: patient referral, expedited partner therapy, provider referral and contract referral. Patient referral means that the patient notifies their sexual partners, either with (enhanced patient referral) or without (simple patient referral) additional verbal or written support. In expedited partner therapy, the patient delivers medication or a prescription for medication to their partner(s) without the need for a medical examination of the partner. In provider referral, health service personnel notify the partners. In contract referral, the index patient is encouraged to notify partner, with the understanding that the partners will be contacted if they do not visit the health service by a certain date. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We analysed data according to paired partner referral strategies. We organised the comparisons first according to four main PN strategies (1. enhanced patient referral, 2. expedited partner therapy, 3. contract referral, 4. provider referral). We compared each main strategy with simple patient referral and then with each other, if trials were available. For continuous outcome measures, we calculated the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For dichotomous variables, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. We performed meta-analyses where appropriate. We performed a sensitivity analysis for the primary outcome re-infection rate of the index patient by excluding studies with attrition of greater than 20%. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 trials (17,578 participants, 9015 women and 8563 men). Five trials were conducted in developing countries. Only two trials were conducted among HIV-positive patients. There was potential for selection bias, owing to the methods of allocation used and of performance bias, owing to the lack of blinding in most included studies. Seven trials had attrition of greater than 20%, increasing the risk of bias.The review found moderate-quality evidence that expedited partner therapy is better than simple patient referral for preventing re-infection of index patients when combining trials of STIs that caused urethritis or cervicitis (6 trials; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89, I(2) = 39%). When studies with attrition greater than 20% were excluded, the effect of expedited partner therapy was attenuated (2 trials; RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.04, I(2) = 0%). In trials restricted to index patients with chlamydia, the effect was attenuated (2 trials; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.35, I(2) = 22%). Expedited partner therapy also increased the number of partners treated per index patient (three trials) when compared with simple patient referral in people with chlamydia or gonorrhoea (MD 0.43, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58) or trichomonas (MD 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.67), and people with any STI syndrome (MD 0.5, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.67). Expedited partner therapy was not superior to enhanced patient referral in preventing re-infection (3 trials; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.53, I(2) = 33%, low-quality evidence). Home sampling kits for partners (four trials) did not result in lower rates of re-infection in the index case (measured in one trial), or higher numbers of partners elicited (three trials), notified (two trials) or treated (one trial) when compared with simple patient referral. There was no consistent evidence for the relative effects of provider, contract or other patient referral methods. In one trial among men with non-gonococcal urethritis, more partners were treated with provider referral than with simple patient referral (MD 0.5, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.63). In one study among people with syphilis, contract referral elicited treatment of more partners than provider referral (MD 2.2, 95% CI 1.95 to 2.45), but the number of partners receiving treatment was the same in both groups. Where measured, there was no statistical evidence of differences in the incidence of adverse effects between PN strategies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence assessed in this review does not identify a single optimal strategy for PN for any particular STI. When combining trials of STI causing urethritis or cervicitis, expedited partner therapy was more successful than simple patient referral for preventing re-infection of the index patient but was not superior to enhanced patient referral. Expedited partner therapy interventions should include all components that were part of the trial intervention package. There was insufficient evidence to determine the most effective components of an enhanced patient referral strategy. There are too few trials to allow consistent conclusions about the relative effects of provider, contract or other patient referral methods for different STIs. More high-quality RCTs of PN strategies for HIV and syphilis, using biological outcomes, are needed.


Assuntos
Busca de Comunicante/métodos , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/transmissão , Infecções por Chlamydia/terapia , Infecções por Chlamydia/transmissão , Feminino , Gonorreia/terapia , Gonorreia/transmissão , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Parceiros Sexuais , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/prevenção & controle , Uretrite/terapia , Cervicite Uterina/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA