Thesaurus for off-label indications for systemic antifungal agents.

OBJECTIVES: Following the removal of temporary treatment protocol procedures, we developed a thesaurus for off-label indications for systemic antifungals at our facility to update clinical practices and to control off-label prescriptions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines and literature data were analyzed. This work was part of an antifungal stewardship program. RESULTS: Off-label wording (prophylaxis, preemptive, empirical, curative) and corresponding antifungals and references were validated by the multidisciplinary group for antifungal agents under the aegis of the Commission for the use of drugs and sterile medical devices and of the anti-infective committee. CONCLUSION: Considering the complexity of invasive fungal infection management, this thesaurus needs to be shared and used as a helping tool to review off-label situations.

Unlicensed and off-label uses of medicines: definitions and clarification of terminology.

The terms 'licensed', 'unlicensed', and 'off-label', often used in relation to marketing and prescribing medicinal products, may confuse UK prescribers. To market a medicinal product in the UK requires a Marketing Authorization ('product licence') for specified indications under specified conditions, regulated by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The Marketing Authorization includes the product's agreed terms of use (the 'label'), described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). Prescribing a licensed product outside those terms is called 'off-label' prescribing. Products for which no-one holds a UK Marketing Authorization are unlicensed. Prescribers can prescribe authorized products according to the conditions described in the SmPC ('on-label') or outside those conditions ('off-label'). They can also prescribe unauthorized products, even if they are unlicensed in the UK, if they are licensed elsewhere or if they have been manufactured in the UK by a licensed manufacturer as a 'special'. The complexities of this system can be understood by considering the status of the manufacturer of the product, the company that markets it (which may or may not be the same), the product itself, and its modes of use, and by emphasizing the word 'authorized'. If a Marketing Authorization is granted to the supplier of a product, it will specify the authorized modes of use; the product will be prescribable as authorized (i.e. 'on-label') or in other modes of use, which will all be off-label. Unlicensed products with no authorized modes of use can be regarded as 'unauthorized products'. All 'specials' can be regarded as authorized products lacking authorized modes of use.

Drug repositioning and repurposing: terminology and definitions in literature.

Drug repositioning and similar terms have been a trending topic in literature and represent novel drug development strategies. We analysed in a quantitative and qualitative manner how these terms were used and defined in the literature. In total, 217 articles referred to 'drug repositioning', 'drug repurposing', 'drug reprofiling', 'drug redirecting' and/or 'drug rediscovery'. Only 67 included a definition ranging from brief and general to extensive and specific. No common definition was identified. Nevertheless, four common features were found: concept, action, use and product. The different wording used for these features often leads to essential differences in meaning between definitions. In case a clear definition is needed, for example from a legal or regulatory perspective, the features can provide further guidance.