Oscillatory potentials in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: The electroretinogram (ERG) has proven to be useful in the evaluation and monitoring of patients with posterior uveitis. ERG oscillatory potentials (OPs) are sometimes reduced in many uveitic eyes with otherwise grossly normal ERG responses. This study compares ERG parameters, including OPs, between patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy, other posterior uveitis, and controls. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study. Sixty-four patients seen at a clinical practice had a total of 93 visits during which ERG was performed on both eyes. ERG data from 93 age-matched controls were also collected. Root-mean-squared (RMS) energy of the OPs was calculated using Fourier analysis for 88 patients and 88 age-matched controls for whom complete data were available. Photopic flicker amplitudes, photopic flicker latencies, scotopic b-wave amplitudes, and OP RMS values were compared between patients and controls. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The mean ages of patients and controls were 55.9 ± 10.8 (SD) years and 55.1 ± 11.5, respectively. 83% of the patients had a diagnosis of BCR. The mean OP RMS value was significantly different in patients (15.6 µV ± 9.7 µV) versus control eyes (33.0 µV ± 12.7 µV), p < 0.001. Area under the ROC curves (AUROC) was 0.75 for photopic flicker amplitudes, 0.77 for photopic flicker latencies, 0.72 for scotopic b-wave amplitudes, and 0.88 for OP RMS. AUROC was significantly different between OP RMS and photopic flicker amplitudes (p < 0.001), between OP RMS and flicker latencies (p = 0.0032), and between OP RMS and scotopic b-wave amplitudes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Analysis of OPs shows greater sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy than photopic and scotopic ERG amplitudes and photopic flicker latencies.

Long-term Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Implants in Uveitic Eyes With Fluocinolone Acetonide Implants.

PRECIS: In eyes with uveitis and a history of fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implantation, glaucoma drainage implants (GDIs) provides excellent long-term control of intraocular pressure (IOP). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term control of IOP achieved by GDIs in uveitic eyes with glaucoma and a FA implant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective case series of 56 eyes from 37 patients with a history of noninfectious posterior uveitis who underwent both FA implantation and GDI surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute between April 2001 and April 2017. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo FA implantation before, or concurrently with, a GDI. Data was collected up to 10 years after GDI surgery. Outcome measures included IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications, and surgical success rate at each timepoint. Success was defined as IOP between 6 and 21 mm Hg at the most recent follow-up visit, without need for GDI removal or additional IOP-lowering surgeries, or loss of light perception. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 71.0 months (median 72.0 mo). IOP was reduced by a mean of 52.9% (range: 43.1% to 62.3%) and the number of IOP-lowering medications decreased by a mean of 69.0% (range: 56.3% to 93.8%) between 1 and 10 years postoperatively. The percentage of eyes with IOP <21 mm Hg was 32.1% at baseline and ranged between 76.8% and 100% at follow-up. The percentage of eyes with IOP <18 mm Hg was 21.4% at baseline and ranged between 67.9% and 100% at follow-up. The surgical success rate was 71.4% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with uveitis that undergo FA implantation, concurrent or subsequent GDI surgery offers excellent long-term control of IOP. Postoperative IOP and number of IOP-lowering medications dropped considerably and remained stable.

Ocular Manifestations and Visual Outcomes of Behçet's Uveitis in a Thai population.

PURPOSE: To report on ocular manifestations and visual outcomes of Thai patients with Behçet's Uveitis (BU). METHODS: We reviewed medical records of 50 BU patients (31 males and 19 females). Ocular manifestations, treatment modalities, complications, and visual outcomes were registered. RESULTS: Ocular involvement was bilateral in 76% of patients, resulting in 89 affected eyes. Panuveitis and posterior uveitis were the most common types. Retinal vasculitis was noted in majority of affected eyes and specifically arteritis was noticed in 32/57(56%). Most patients received combination therapy of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine 72%). At final visit, VA ≤20/200 was observed in 25 affected eyes (28%). Risk factors for poor visual outcome were poor visual acuity at presentation (p < 0.001) and development of optic atrophy (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Typical ocular manifestations of Thai patients with BU consisted of bilateral uveitis affecting posterior eye segment with high rate of complications and frequent visual loss.

Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Noninfectious Uveitis (SARIL-NIU):: The Phase 2 SATURN Study.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, for treatment of posterior segment noninfectious uveitis (NIU). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight patients (eyes) with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. METHODS: Eyes received treatment every 2 weeks for 16 weeks with subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥2-step reduction in vitreous haze (VH) on the Miami scale or with a reduction of systemic corticosteroids (prednisolone or equivalent) to a dose of <10 mg/day at week 16. Primary end point was based on VH evaluation by a central reading center. Investigator evaluation of VH was a prespecified, planned secondary analysis. RESULTS: At week 16, proportion of patients taking sarilumab or placebo with ≥2-step reduction in VH or corticosteroid dose <10 mg/day was 46.1% vs. 30.0% (P = 0.2354) based on central reading center assessment of VH and 64.0% vs. 35.0% (P = 0.0372) based on investigator assessment of VH, respectively. In the subgroup of eyes with VH grade ≥2 at baseline, the mean VH reduction from baseline to week 16 was significantly greater with sarilumab vs. placebo regardless of assessment by the central reading center (-2.1 [n = 11] vs. -1.7 [n = 3], respectively; P = 0.0255) or investigator (-2.5 [n = 19] vs. -1.2 [n = 11], respectively; P = 0.0170). The mean best-corrected visual acuity gain from baseline to week 16 was greater with sarilumab vs. placebo in the overall population (8.9 vs. 3.6 letters, respectively; P = 0.0333) and in the subgroup of eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 µm at baseline (12.2 [n = 13] vs. 2.1 [n = 7] letters, respectively; P = 0.0517). Corresponding changes in CST were -46.8 vs. +2.6 µm (P = 0.0683) in the overall population and -112.5 [n = 13] vs. -1.8 [n = 6] µm (P = 0.1317) in the subgroup of eyes with CST ≥300 µm at baseline, respectively. The most common ocular adverse events were worsening of uveitis (0 [placebo] and 3 [sarilumab] patients) and retinal infiltrates (1 [placebo] and 2 [sarilumab] patients). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous sarilumab may provide clinical benefits in the management of NIU of the posterior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.

Immunosuppressants and/or antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in punctate inner choroidopathy? Follow-up results with optical coherence tomography angiography.

PURPOSE: To report the effectiveness of treatment with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-inhibitor and/or immunosuppressants in punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) using standard imaging modalities and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) over a time period of 16 months. METHODS: In this prospective, unmasked, single-centre study, 23 individuals with PIC underwent imaging with spectral domain OCT, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography and OCTA. Two groups were formed based on systemic treatment. In case of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) activity, intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were carried out in both groups. RESULTS: Group I included 12 patients (24 eyes) with 18 affected eyes (75%) who did not receive any systemic therapy at baseline. Group II contained 11 patients (22 eyes) who started systemic immunosuppressive therapy on average 2 years before baseline. All eyes with recurrence of CNV or residual fluid (group I: seven eyes; group II: six eyes) received anti-VEGF agents. Group I showed a significant reduction of CNV size (p=0.0078), as well as a decrease of fluid retention (p=0.0078) on OCTA after anti-VEGF injection. Group II did not demonstrate any significant reduction of CNV size, vessel shape or fluid retention post injection. But overall, fluid accumulation was significantly lower in group II (median=0.03 mm2) than in group I (median=0.32 mm2) (p=0.0028). CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressants in addition to anti-VEGF agents showed a significant reduction of fluid accumulation, that is, reduced disease activity. We conclude that there is a benefit and effectiveness of immunosuppressants to control inflammatory secondary CNV in PIC.

Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab in Patients with Noninfectious Uveitis in an Ongoing Open-Label Study: VISUAL III.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of adalimumab in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. DESIGN: Phase 3, open-label, multicenter clinical trial extension (VISUAL III). PARTICIPANTS: Adults meeting treatment failure (TF) criteria or who completed VISUAL I or II (phase 3, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled) without TF. METHODS: Patients received adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Interim follow-up data were described from VISUAL III weeks 0 through 78. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease quiescence, steroid-free quiescence, active inflammatory chorioretinal/retinal vascular lesions, anterior chamber cell grade, vitreous haze grade, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and corticosteroid dose. Binary data were reported using nonresponder imputation (NRI), continuous data using last observation carried forward and as-observed analysis, and corticosteroid dose using observed-case analysis. Adverse events (AEs) were reported from first adalimumab dose in VISUAL III through interim cutoff. RESULTS: Of 424 patients enrolled, 371 were included in intent-to-treat analysis. At study entry, 242 of 371 (65%) patients had active uveitis; 60% (145/242, NRI) achieved quiescence at week 78, and 66% (95/143, as-observed) of those were corticosteroid free. At study entry, 129 of 371 (35%) patients had inactive uveitis; 74% (96/129, NRI) achieved quiescence at week 78, and 93% (89/96, as-observed) of those were corticosteroid free. Inflammatory lesions, anterior chamber grade, and vitreous haze grade showed initial improvement followed by decline in patients with active uveitis and remained stable in patients with inactive uveitis. BCVA improved in patients with active uveitis from weeks 0 to 78 (0.27 to 0.14 logMAR; left and right eyes; as-observed) and remained stable in patients with inactive uveitis. Mean corticosteroid dose decreased from 13.6 mg/day (week 0) to 2.6 mg/day (week 78) in patients with active uveitis and remained stable in those with inactive uveitis (1.5-1.2 mg/day). AEs (424 events/100 patient-years) and serious AEs (16.5 events/100 patient-years) were comparable with previous VISUAL trials. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with active uveitis at study entry who received adalimumab therapy were likely to achieve quiescence, improve visual acuity, and reduce their daily uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid use. Most patients with inactive uveitis at study entry sustained quiescence without a systemic corticosteroid dose increase. No new safety signals were identified.

Intravenous Ceftriaxone for Syphilitic Uveitis.

PURPOSE: Report of clinical/multimodal imaging outcomes of patients with syphilitic uveitis alternatively treated with intravenous(IV) ceftriaxone, due to unavailability of penicillin G. METHODS: Chart review of all cases of syphilitic uveitis presenting to Hospital São Geraldo/HC-UFMG and treated with intravenous ceftriaxone, between January and August 2014. Clinical, serological and ophthalmological data were collected. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients with syphilitic uveitis receiving IV ceftriaxone were identified. All 24 eyes had active intraocular inflammation on clinical examination. All patients received IV ceftriaxone (2-4 g daily) for 14-21 days, supplemented with oral corticosteroid as needed in 9 patients (75%), after documented clinical response. Improvement in intraocular inflammation was seen in all 24 eyes, with median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increasing from 20/50 to 20/20, after a mean follow-up of 5.3 months. CONCLUSION: IV ceftriaxone may be an effective alternative for treatment of syphilitic uveitis, in the setting of unavailability of penicillin G.

Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascularization: Beyond the Intravitreal Approach.

PURPOSE: To describe the importance of a customized combined systemic and local therapy in the management of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (iCNV). METHODS: Observational retrospective case series. RESULTS: Four iCNV cases, complicating posterior uveitis or panuveitis affecting young patients, are reported. Combination of both intravitreal (IVT) and systemic drugs represented a successful treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: iCNV is a sight-threatening disease which affects mostly young people. Customized and both systemic and IVT therapies might represent the best therapeutic option in order to obtain disease control and good prognosis.

Dexamethasone implants in paediatric patients with noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis: first prospective exploratory case series.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone (DEX) implants in paediatric patients with noninfectious intermediate or posterior uveitis. METHODS: Prospective single center exploratory case series. Children and adolescents, 6 to 17 years old, with a vitreous haze score of ≥1.5+ or cystoid macular edema (CME) of >300 µm were enrolled. Vitreous haze score at month 2 was chosen as primary endpoint. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and concomitant medication at month 6 were defined as secondary endpoints. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract formation were determined as safety endpoints. RESULTS: Three out of 6 eligible patients participated in the case series. At month 2, vitreous haze was reduced from a score of 1.5+ to 0.5+ and 0 and BCVA improved by ≥3 lines, ≥4 lines and ≥2 lines of Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS)-letters, respectively. Visual acuity gain was accompanied by a CRT reduction of -186 µm and -83 µm in the first and third patient, in whom CME was the indication for DEX implantation. A reduction of concomitant medication was achieved in 1 patient. IOP increase was seen in all 3 patients, but could be treated sufficiently with primarily IOP lowering medications and without need for glaucoma surgery. Cataract progression did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: DEX implants led to an improvement in all endpoints, especially BCVA. This study confirms that IOP rises may also occur in the paediatric population and should be monitored and treated appropriately. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials (EudraCT)- nr: 2013-000541-39.

Association Between Visual Function Response and Reduction of Inflammation in Noninfectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment.

Purpose: To examine the association between visual function response (VFR) and inflammation reduction in active noninfectious uveitis of the posterior segment (NIU-PS). Methods: Phase 3 SAKURA Study 1 randomized 347 subjects in a double-masked fashion to receive injections of intravitreal sirolimus 44 µg (n = 117); 440 µg (n = 114); or 880 µg (n = 116) every other month. Vitreous haze (VH) response, a measure of inflammation reduction, was defined as a VH score of 0 or 0.5+ at month 5 based on the modified Standardized Uveitis Nomenclature Scale. Visual function was assessed with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). In this post-hoc analysis, principal component analysis was used to reduce the information in the multidimensional visual function outcome to a restricted number of independently relevant VFR measures. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for the VFQ-25-derived components were based on the standard error of measurements. Overall VFR was defined as either a BCVA improvement of ≥2 lines, or an improvement exceeding the MCID in the VFQ-25 based visual function measures. Results: The VFQ-25 composite score (VFQCS) and mental health subscale score (VFQMHS) were retained as relevant VFRs, with MCIDs of 4.3 and 11.7 points, respectively. A vitreous haze response was significantly associated with each VFR measure: VFQCS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23; P = 0.0004); VFQMHS (OR = 2.84; P < 0.0001); BCVA (OR = 2.60; P = 0.0009), and overall VFR (OR = 2.65; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Inflammation reduction to a VH score of 0 or 0.5+ was significantly associated with improved visual function. Achieving a VH response of 0 or 0.5+ is a patient-relevant outcome.

Effect of Adalimumab on Visual Functioning in Patients With Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, and Panuveitis in the VISUAL-1 and VISUAL-2 Trials.

Importance: Adalimumab was recently approved for the treatment of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Objective: To assess the effect of adalimumab on the visual functioning and quality of life in patients with corticosteroid-dependent noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Design: A post hoc analysis of clinical trials of adults with active (VISUAL-1) and inactive (VISUAL-2) noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis was conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, Australia, Latin America, and Japan. A total of 217 patients (110 adalimumab, 107 placebo) in VISUAL-1 and 226 patients (115 adalimumab, 111 placebo) in VISUAL-2 were studied using intent-to-treat analyses. The clinical trials were conducted between August 10, 2010, and May 14, 2015. Interventions: In VISUAL-1 and VISUAL-2, patients were randomized to receive adalimumab, 80-mg, subcutaneous loading dose followed by 40 mg every other week or placebo for 80 weeks. All patients underwent prednisone tapering, with patients in VISUAL-1 receiving an initial prednisone burst. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 25-item National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) composite score questionnaire assessed the impact of visual impairment from the patient's perspective; scores on the questionnaire range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better vision-related quality of life. The change in NEI VFQ-25 from best state achieved prior to week 6 (VISUAL-1) and from baseline state (VISUAL-2) to the final or early termination visit was determined in each group and statistically compared using analysis of variance. The temporal effects of adalimumab and placebo on NEI VFQ-25 were investigated using a longitudinal model. Results: Of the 217 patients in VISUAL-1, 124 (57.1%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 42.7 (14.9) years. Of the 226 patients in VISUAL-2, 138 (61.1%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (13.4). In VISUAL-1, the change from final score to best score in NEI VFQ-25 was -1.30 for adalimumab and -5.50 for placebo-a difference of 4.20 (95% CI, 1.04 to 7.36; P = .01) associated with adalimumab compared with placebo. In VISUAL-2, the change from baseline NEI VFQ-25 was 3.36 for adalimumab and 1.24 for placebo-a difference of 2.12 (95% CI, -0.81 to 5.04; P = .16). In both trials, the longitudinal models showed a significant difference in NEI VFQ-25 between adalimumab and placebo of 3.07 (95% CI, 2.09 to 4.06; P < .001) and 4.66 (95% CI, 0.05 to 9.26; P = .048) in the VISUAL-1 (74.15 vs 71.08) and VISUAL-2 (82.39 vs 77.73) trials, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This post hoc analysis suggests that adalimumab is associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported visual functioning for patients with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01138657 (VISUAL-1) and NCT01124838 (VISUAL-2).

Electroretinogram and visual field changes in a case of birdshot chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: This case report explores the role of the visual field perimetry and electroretinogram (ERG) in cases of non-infectious uveitis in the assessment and monitoring of retinal function and response to treatment. METHODS: A 59-year-old Caucasian female presenting with bilateral posterior uveitis newly diagnosed as birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) presenting with bilateral decrease in visual acuity and cystoid macular edema, as well as a paracentral scotoma in the right eye. The diagnosis and follow-up of the case was done using visual field perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ERG. RESULTS: Baseline ERG showed a marked decrease in the amplitudes of the scotopic and photopic responses and a delay of peak times mainly in the right eye. Mycophenolate mofetil at 2 g/day and oral prednisolone at 1 g/kg/day were administered with gradual tapering of the corticosteroids. After 5 months, there was a noticeable improvement in the visual acuity, macular edema in OCT, and an obvious increase in the amplitudes of the ERG associated with a decrease in peak times, particularly in the 30 Hz photopic 3.0 Flicker of the right eye. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the importance of the peak time and wave amplitudes of the 30 Hz photopic DA 3.0 Flicker as being a sensitive parameter in the diagnosis and follow-up of BSCR.

Long-term Efficacy of Interferon in Severe Uveitis Associated with Behçet Disease.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the frequency of ocular relapse and the possibility of long-term remission in patients treated with interferon (IFN) for severe uveitis associated with Behçet disease. METHODS: All patients were treated with an initial dosage of 3 million IU IFN three times a week. The main outcome measure was the number of relapses per person per year before, during, and after IFN treatment. RESULTS: Of 36 patients (67 eyes), 31 (86.1%) responded to IFN. The mean follow-up was 8.19 years. Twenty-one out of 36 patients discontinued IFN and 76% of these have not relapsed within 5.05 years after discontinuation. The mean relapse per person per year decreased significantly from 1.39 to 0.0496 (p = 1.82×10-10) during the treatment period and remained at 0.057 relapses per person per year after IFN discontinuation. CONCLUSION: IFN efficiently decreases the relapse rate and seems to permit long-term remission even after discontinuation.

Detection of mild papilloedema in posterior uveitis using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods for diagnosing mild papilloedema (PO) using peripapillary total retinal (PTR) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measurement by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients suffering from posterior uveitis. METHODS: 17 eyes in 17 patients with PO caused by posterior uveitis, 15 eyes in 15 patients with uveitis but with no PO based on slit lamp analysis were studied. High-quality OCT fundus images were analysed and graded by three masked observers using the Modified Frisén Scale. Eyes with PO were divided into two subgroups: mild (n=15) and moderate-severe PO (n=2). Two measurement methods were evaluated and compared: RNFL and PTR thickness measurements centred on the optic disc. Thickness values were calculated overall and for each quadrant and compared between groups. The main outcome measures were RNFL and PTR thickness, and thickness variation between control and affected patients for both protocols. RESULTS: Average RNFL and PTR thickness in the moderate-severe PO, mild PO and control groups were 274.5±54.45 µm, 134±31.69 µm, 97.4±14.43 µm and 722.25±29.34 µm, 437.53±84.47 µm, 327.8±25.92 µm, respectively. Mild PO differed from the control groups according to both the RNLF (p=0.0006) and the PTR (p=0.0002) measurements. The average thickness variation between control and mild PO was significantly different between RNFL and PTR measurements: 36.6 µm vs 109.73 µm (p<0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PTR thickness measurement increases the sensitivity of detection of mild PO and could be useful for diagnosing and monitoring papillitis. A new protocol should be developed to measure PTR in the same 3.5 mm disc as the RNFL measurement.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema in Chronic Non-infectious Uveitis.

PURPOSE: To report observations on the single and repeat use of the dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant (Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) for the treatment of macular edema in patients with non-infectious posterior segment uveitis. METHODS: A chart review of 15 consecutive patients (25 eyes) was conducted. The primary outcome measure of the first and subsequent implants was central retinal thickness (CRT) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (sdOCT). Secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), time to repeat implant, and adverse events. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine the effect of the DEX implant compared with baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to examine survival from relapse. RESULTS: A total of 35 implants on 25 eyes of 15 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 91.4% (32 of 35 eyes) had a reduction in CRT and 80% (20 of 25 eyes) had improved BCVA. After the first DEX implant, CRT decreased from 590 µm (SE: 28 µm) at baseline to 370 µm (SE: 31 µm) at 3 months (p < 0.001). The logMAR VA was 0.614 (SE: 0.089) at baseline and improved to 0.35 (SE: 0.10, p = 0.002), reaching a statistically significant difference at 3 months. A repeat implant led to VA improvement of -0.184 logMAR (SE: 0.171 logMAR) and CRT reduction of -291 µm (SE: 74 µm). There was no significant difference in effect between the first repeat implant and the initial implant. Kaplan-Meier estimates of treatment success were 72% between 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The DEX implant is an effective adjunct treatment to systemic corticosteroid or immunomodulatory therapy. Additional research is required to determine the efficacy of DEX implant as monotherapy for controlling chronic uveitic macular edema.

[Vision-and health-related quality of life in patients with uveitis].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vision-and health-related quality of life in patients with uveitis, and to evaluate the relationship between quality of life and visual acuity. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. One hundred and eleven patients with uveitis were enrolled in the study from January 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014 in Peking University First Hospital. Clinical data collected included medical history, complete ophthalmologic examination and best corrected visual acuity (LogMAR). Basic clinical data (gender, diagnosis, etc.) was also collected. The National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were administered. The patients were divided into two groups, anterior uveitis group (ATU), and other types of uveitis in this study (OTU). T-test was used for analysis of the data which obey standard normal distribution, otherwise rank sum test was used for data analysis. Correlation and Linear regression were constructed between bilateral visual acuity and the scores of NEI VFQ-25 and SF-36 questionnaires. RESULTS: For all the 111 cases included in this study, 87 (78.4%) of them were anterior uveitis (ATU), 5 of them were intermediate uveitis, 7 of them were posterior uveitis and 12 of them were pan uveitis. Mean visual acuity of better and worse eye were 0.0 and 0.2 in ATU patients, respectively. Mean visual acuity of better and worse eye were 0.1 and 0.4 in OTU patients, respectively. Patients rated the general health subscale score of NEI VFQ-25 and SF-36 lower than other subscales, respectively (score of general health was 25.0 (25.0-50.0) in NEI VFQ-25 and 46.8 (19.8) in SF-36). ATU group scored higher that OTU group (Mean score of SF-36 was 77.5 (10.7) and 68.8 (16.9) in ATU and OTU group respectively, P value of SF-36< 0.01, t=9.54. Mean score of NEI VFQ-25 was 77.3 (12.8) and 59.1 (16.5) in ATU and OTU group respectively, P value of NEI VFQ-25<0.01, t=33.16). Mean score of NEI VFQ-25 of all patients was 73.4 (15.5). Mean visual acuity of better eye and worse eye of all patients were 0.0 (-0.2-1.0) and 0.3 (0.5), respectively. The correlation coefficient was -0.497 (P<0.01, t=-5.98) between NEI VFQ -25 score and visual acuity in better eye, and -0.32 (t=-3.48, P<0.01) between NEI VFQ-25 score and visual acuity in worse eye. The coefficient was -3.9 in linear regression of visual acuity in better eye against NEI VFQ-25 score (t=-5.98, P<0.01), and -1.1 of visual acuity in worse eye against NEI VFQ-25 score (t=-3.48,P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: General health was more affected than other function subscales in uveitis. The quality of life in anterior uveitis was higher than other types of uveitis in this study. Vision-related quality of life correlated with both eyes.(Chin J Ophthalmol, 2016, 52: 429-436).

COMBINED VITRECTOMY AND INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE (OZURDEX) SUSTAINED-RELEASE IMPLANT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining intravitreal dexamethasone implantation (Ozurdex) with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on cases where Ozurdex injection was performed in the operating room in conjunction with pars plana vitrectomy. Our primary outcome measure was the presence of surgical complications in the perioperative and 3-month postoperative window. We also measured visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and macular edema at baseline, one, and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes in 14 cases were reviewed. There were no complications intraoperatively or at 1-month postoperatively. Two patients (2 eyes) with prior retinal detachment developed proliferative vitreoretinopathy and redetachment at 3 months. Visual acuity improved in 7 of 15 eyes, and an average improvement of 2 lines was achieved for the entire cohort. There was no overall change in intraocular pressure although 1 patient developed an increase in intraocular pressure >5 mmHg. Five of 9 patients with baseline macular edema experienced improvement or resolution at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative Ozurdex in combination with PPV may be safe and effective in treating macular edema caused by many different underlying diseases.

Outcome of Treating Pediatric Uveitis With Dexamethasone Implants.

PURPOSE: To describe the outcome in children of eyes with uveitis following repeated treatment with dexamethasone (Ozurdex) implants. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional study. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 16 pediatric patients with uveitis were treated with 35 dexamethasone implants at a tertiary referral center. Following implantations, anatomic and functional outcomes, as well as ocular complications, were noted. Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness, number and dosage of systemic immunosuppression drugs, vitreous haze score, and presence of raised intraocular pressure or cataract. RESULTS: Following the first implantation, average best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.55 ± 0.08 logMAR to 0.37 ± 0.08 logMAR (P = .024), central retinal thickness decreased by 219 ± 55 µm (P = .01), and the percentage of eyes achieving a vitreous haze score of 0 increased from 41% to 88% (P = .006). The median time to relapse following the first injection was 9 months, with a similar response achieved after each repeat implantation. Children previously requiring systemic immunosuppression at the time of the first implantation were able to stop or significantly reduce the dose and number of drugs. In total there were 4 instances of cataract progression that were not visually significant and did not require surgical treatment and 6 cases of raised IOP, 5 of which were treated pharmacologically with no surgical intervention required and 1 that required revision of a previous filtration surgery. There were no cases of implant migration into the anterior chamber, endophthalmitis, or retinal detachment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dexamethasone implants in children results in improved retinal thickness and reduction in ocular inflammation, which can improve vision for several months. Repeat implantations result in continued control of the inflammation, allowing for reduction of systemic immunosuppression with few ocular complications.

Benefits of Systemic Anti-inflammatory Therapy versus Fluocinolone Acetonide Intraocular Implant for Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, and Panuveitis: Fifty-four-Month Results of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial and Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the benefits of fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy versus systemic corticosteroid therapy supplemented (when indicated) with immunosuppression for intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. DESIGN: Additional follow-up of a randomized comparative effectiveness trial cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-five patients with intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis randomized to implant or systemic therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field mean deviation (MD), activity of uveitis, and presence of macular edema (per reading center grading) ascertained prospectively. METHODS: Trial participants were followed-up for 54 months from original randomization. RESULTS: The visual function trajectory in uveitic eyes demonstrated a similar (P = 0.73) degree of modest (not statistically significant) improvement from baseline to 54 months in both groups (mean improvement in BCVA at 54 months, 2.4 and 3.1 letters in the implant and systemic groups, respectively). Many had excellent initial visual acuity, limiting the potential for improvement. The mean automated perimetry MD score remained similar to baseline throughout 48 months of follow-up in both groups. Overall control of inflammation was superior in the implant group at every time point assessed (P < 0.016), although most eyes in the systemic therapy arm also showed substantial improvement, achieving complete control or low levels of inflammation. Although macular edema improved significantly more often with implant treatment within the first 6 months, the systemic group gradually improved over time such that the proportions with macular edema converged in the 2 groups by 36 months and overlapped thereafter (P = 0.41 at 48 months). CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide implant and systemic treatment for intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis were similarly favorable through 54 months. The implant maintained a clear advantage in controlling inflammation through 54 months. Nevertheless, with systemic therapy, most patients also experienced greatly improved inflammatory status. Macular edema improved equally with longer follow-up. Based on cost effectiveness and side-effect considerations, systemic therapy may be indicated as the initial treatment for many bilateral uveitis cases. However, implant therapy is a reasonable alternative, especially for unilateral cases and when systemic therapy is not feasible or is not successful.

Quality of Life and Risks Associated with Systemic Anti-inflammatory Therapy versus Fluocinolone Acetonide Intraocular Implant for Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, or Panuveitis: Fifty-four-Month Results of the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial and Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the risks and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes of fluocinolone acetonide implant versus systemic therapy with corticosteroid and immunosuppression when indicated for intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. DESIGN: Additional follow-up of a randomized trial cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-five patients with intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis, randomized to implant or systemic therapy. METHODS: Randomized subjects with intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis (479 eyes) were followed up over 54 months, with 79.2% completing the 54-month visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local and systemic potential complications of the therapies and self-reported health utility and vision-related and generic health-related QoL were studied prospectively. RESULTS: Among initially phakic eyes, cataract and cataract surgery occurred significantly more often in the implant group (hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; P = 0.0001; and HR, 3.8; P < 0.0001, respectively). In the implant group, most cataract surgery occurred within the first 2 years. Intraocular pressure elevation measures occurred more frequently in the implant group (HR range, 3.7-5.6; all P < 0.0001), and glaucoma (assessed annually) also occurred more frequently (26.3% vs. 10.2% by 48 months; HR, 3.0; P = 0.0002). In contrast, potential complications of systemic therapy, including measures of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, bone disease, and hematologic and serum chemistry indicators of immunosuppression toxicity, did not differ between groups through 54 months. Indices of QoL initially favored implant therapy by a modest margin. However, all summary measures of health utility and vision-related or generic health-related QoL were minimally and nonsignificantly different by 54 months, with the exception of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary score, which favored implant by a small margin at 54 months (3.17 on a scale of 100; P = 0.01, not adjusted for multiple comparisons). Mean QoL results were favorable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fluocinolone acetonide implant therapy is associated with a clinically important increased risk of glaucoma and cataract with respect to systemic therapy, suggesting that careful monitoring and early intervention to prevent glaucoma is warranted with implant therapy. Systemic therapy subjects avoided a significant excess of toxicities of systemic corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapies in the trial. Self-reported QoL measures initially favored implant therapy, but over time the measures converged, with generally favorable QoL in both groups.