Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.

Perrone, A; Savelli, S; Maggi, C; Di Pietro, L; Di Maurizio, M; Tesei, J; Ballesio, L; De Felice, C; Giancotti, A; Di Iorio, R; Manganaro, L

Perrone, A; Savelli, S; Maggi, C; Di Pietro, L; Di Maurizio, M; Tesei, J; Ballesio, L; De Felice, C; Giancotti, A; Di Iorio, R; Manganaro, L.

Affiliation

Perrone A; Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza, Via Regina Elena 324, Rome, Italy. lara.perrone@uniroma1.it

Radiol Med ; 113(2): 225-41, 2008 Mar.

Article in En, It | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18386124

Subject(s)

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Fetal Diseases/diagnosis; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Adult; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods; Female; Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prenatal Diagnosis / Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Fetal Diseases Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Language: En / It Journal: Radiol Med Year: 2008 Document type: Article

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google