Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of brain lesions: a large-scale intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadodiamide.
Rowley, H A; Scialfa, G; Gao, P-y; Maldjian, J A; Hassell, D; Kuhn, M J; Wippold, F J; Gallucci, M; Bowen, B C; Schmalfuss, I M; Ruscalleda, J; Bastianello, S; Colosimo, C.
Affiliation
  • Rowley HA; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. hrowley@uwhealth.org
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 29(9): 1684-91, 2008 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18599575
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

The higher relaxivity of gadobenate dimeglumine compared with gadodiamide is potentially advantageous for contrast-enhanced brain MR imaging. This study intraindividually compared 0.1-mmol/kg doses of these agents for qualitative and quantitative lesion enhancement. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Adult patients with suggested or known brain lesions underwent 2 identical MR imaging examinations at 1.5T, one with gadobenate dimeglumine and the other with gadodiamide. The agents were administered in randomized order separated by 3-14 days. Imaging sequences and postinjection acquisition timing were identical for the 2 examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images qualitatively for diagnostic information (lesion extent, delineation, morphology, enhancement, and global preference) and quantitatively for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).

RESULTS:

One hundred thirteen of 138 enrolled patients successfully underwent both examinations. Final diagnoses were intra-axial tumor, metastasis, extra-axial tumor, or other (47, 27, 18, and 21 subjects, respectively). Readers 1, 2, and 3 demonstrated global preference for gadobenate dimeglumine in 63 (55.8%), 77 (68.1%), and 73 (64.6%) patients, respectively, compared with 3, 2, and 3 patients for gadodiamide (P < .0001, all readers). Highly significant (P < .0001, all readers) preference for gadobenate dimeglumine was demonstrated for all qualitative end points and for CNR (increases of 23.3%-34.7% and 42.4%-48.9% [spin-echo and gradient-refocused echo sequences, respectively] for gadobenate dimeglumine compared with gadodiamide). Inter-reader agreement was good for all evaluations (kappa = 0.47-0.69). Significant preference for gadobenate dimeglumine was demonstrated for all lesion subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION:

Significantly greater diagnostic information and lesion enhancement are achieved on brain MR imaging with 0.1-mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine compared with gadodiamide at an equivalent dose.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Brain Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Contrast Media / Gadolinium DTPA / Meglumine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2008 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Brain Neoplasms / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Contrast Media / Gadolinium DTPA / Meglumine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Year: 2008 Document type: Article