Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Presence of de novo mutations in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients without family history.
Reed, Berenice; McFann, Kim; Kimberling, William J; Pei, York; Gabow, Patricia A; Christopher, Karen; Petersen, Eric; Kelleher, Catherine; Fain, Pamela R; Johnson, Ann; Schrier, Robert W.
Affiliation
  • Reed B; Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, University of Colorado Denver and Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80014, USA. berenice.gitomer@uchsc.edu
Am J Kidney Dis ; 52(6): 1042-50, 2008 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18640754
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

At the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, on detailed questioning, approximately 10% of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) gave no family history of ADPKD. There are several explanations for this observation, including occurrence of a de novo pathogenic sequence variant or extreme phenotypic variability. To confirm de novo sequence variants, we have undertaken clinical and genetic screening of affected offspring and their parents. STUDY

DESIGN:

Case series. SETTING &

PARTICIPANTS:

24 patients with a well-documented ADPKD phenotype and no family history of polycystic kidney disease (PKD) and both parents of each patient.

OUTCOME:

Presence or absence of PKD1 or PKD2 pathogenic sequence variants in parents of affected offspring. MEASUREMENTS Abdominal ultrasound of affected offspring and their parents for ADPKD diagnosis. Parentage testing by genotyping. Complete screening of PKD1 and PKD2 genes by using genomic DNA from affected offspring; analysis of genomic DNA from both parents to confirm the absence or presence of all DNA variants found.

RESULTS:

A positive diagnosis of ADPKD by means of ultrasound or genetic screening was made in 1 parent of 4 patients (17%). No PKD1 or PKD2 pathogenic sequence variants were identified in 10 patients (42%), whereas possible pathological DNA variants were identified in 4 patients (17%) and 1 of their respective parents. Parentage was confirmed in the remaining 6 patients (25%), and de novo sequence variants were documented.

LIMITATIONS:

Size of patient group. No direct examination of RNA.

CONCLUSION:

Causes other than de novo pathogenic sequence variants may explain the negative family history of ADPKD in certain families.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant / Mutation Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Year: 2008 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant / Mutation Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Year: 2008 Document type: Article