Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: 1-year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial.
Redfern, J; Briffa, T; Ellis, E; Freedman, S B.
Affiliation
  • Redfern J; Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Hospital Road, Concord, Australia. julieredfern@dodo.com.au
Heart ; 95(6): 468-75, 2009 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18801781
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the effect of a new CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) programme on cardiovascular risk factors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) survivors.

DESIGN:

Single-blind randomised controlled trial.

SETTING:

Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney Australia. PATIENTS 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing standard cardiac rehabilitation. Data were also collected on a further 64 ACS survivors attending standard cardiac rehabilitation. INTERVENTION The CHOICE group (n = 72) participated in a brief, patient-centred, modular programme comprising a clinic visit plus telephone support, encompassing mandatory cholesterol lowering and tailored preferential risk modification. The control group (n = 72) participated in continuing conventional care but no centrally coordinated secondary prevention. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Values for total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking status and physical activity.

RESULTS:

CHOICE and control groups were well matched at baseline. At 12 months, the CHOICE group (n = 67) had significantly better risk factor levels than controls (n = 69) for total cholesterol (TC) (mean (SEM) 4.0 (0.1) vs 4.7 (0.1) mmol/l, p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (131.6 (1.8) vs 143.9 (2.3) mm Hg, p<0.001), body mass index (28.9 (0.7) vs 31.2 (0.7) kg/m(2), p = 0.025) and physical activity (1369.1 (167.2) vs 715.1 (103.5) METS/kg/min, p = 0.001) as well as a better knowledge of risk factor targets. Also at 1 year, fewer CHOICE participants (21%) had three or more risk factors above widely recommended levels then controls (72%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Participation in a brief CHOICE programme significantly improved the modifiable risk profiles and risk factor knowledge of ACS survivors over 12 months. CHOICE is an effective alternative for dealing with the widespread underuse of existing secondary prevention programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN42984084.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Topics: Acesso_medicamentos_insumos_estrategicos Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / Acute Coronary Syndrome Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Heart Year: 2009 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Topics: Acesso_medicamentos_insumos_estrategicos Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Participation / Acute Coronary Syndrome Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Heart Year: 2009 Document type: Article