Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy via the areola approach: a retrospective analysis of safety, postoperative recovery, and patient satisfaction.

Lu, J H; Materazzi, G; Miccoli, M; Baggiani, A; Hu, S; Miccoli, P

Lu, J H; Materazzi, G; Miccoli, M; Baggiani, A; Hu, S; Miccoli, P.

Affiliation

Lu JH; Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. husanyuan1962@hotmail.com

Minerva Chir ; 67(1): 31-7, 2012 Feb.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22361674

Subject(s)

Endoscopy; Thyroidectomy/methods; Video-Assisted Surgery; Adult; Breast/surgery; Endoscopy/methods; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Video-Assisted Surgery/methods

Search on Google

XML

PubMed Links

Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Thyroidectomy / Video-Assisted Surgery / Endoscopy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Minerva Chir Year: 2012 Document type: Article

Search on Google

XML

PubMed Links