Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene mesh with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty.

Bury, K; Smietanski, M

Bury, K; Smietanski, M.

Affiliation

Bury K; Department of Vascular and Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Debinki 7, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland. kbury@gumed.edu.pl

Hernia ; 16(5): 549-53, 2012 Oct.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22573261

Subject(s)

Dioxanes/therapeutic use; Hernia, Inguinal/surgery; Pain, Postoperative/etiology; Polyesters/therapeutic use; Polypropylenes/therapeutic use; Surgical Mesh; Absorbable Implants/adverse effects; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Dioxanes/adverse effects; Follow-Up Studies; Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Polyesters/adverse effects; Polypropylenes/adverse effects; Recurrence; Statistics, Nonparametric; Surgical Mesh/adverse effects; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Polyesters / Polypropylenes / Surgical Mesh / Dioxanes / Hernia, Inguinal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Hernia Year: 2012 Document type: Article

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google