Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Kinesiology tape does not promote vertical jumping performance: A deceptive crossover trial.
Cheung, R T H; Yau, Q K C; Wong, K; Lau, P; So, A; Chan, N; Kwok, C; Poon, K Y; Yung, P S H.
Affiliation
  • Cheung RT; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. Electronic address: roy.cheung@polyu.edu.hk.
  • Yau QK; Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
  • Wong K; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lau P; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
  • So A; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan N; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
  • Kwok C; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
  • Poon KY; Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China.
  • Yung PS; Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Man Ther ; 21: 89-93, 2016 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26139360
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Kinesiology tape (KINTAPE) is one of the most common adhesive therapeutic tapes. Apart from clinical applications, KINTAPE claims to be able to enhance functional performance by muscle activity facilitation. However, emerging evidence suggests that the isokinetic muscle strength remains similar when the placebo effect is eliminated.

OBJECTIVES:

In view of the weak relationship between functional performance and isokinetic muscle strength, this study investigated the true effects of KINTAPE on functional performance.

DESIGN:

Deceptive, randomized, and crossover trial.

METHOD:

Sixty four experienced volleyball players performed vertical jumping test under three taping conditions true facilitative KINTAPE, sham KINTAPE, and no KINTAPE. Under the pretense of applying adhesive muscle sensors, KINTAPE was applied to their quadriceps and gastrocnemius in the first two conditions. Mean maximum jump height and peak jump power were averaged from three attempts. Within-subject comparisons were conducted by repeated measure ANOVA.

RESULTS:

Out of 64 participants, 30 of them were successfully deceived and they were ignorant about KINTAPE. No significant differences were found in both maximum jump height (η(2) = 0.001; p = 0.241) and peak jump power (η(2) = 0.001; p = 0.134) between three taping conditions.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results showed that KINTAPE did not facilitate muscle performance by generating higher jumping power or yielding a better jumping performance. These findings reinforce that previously reported muscle facilitatory effects or functional enhancement using KINTAPE may be attributed to placebo effects.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Athletic Injuries / Muscle, Skeletal / Quadriceps Muscle / Muscle Strength / Volleyball / Athletic Tape Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Man Ther Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Athletic Injuries / Muscle, Skeletal / Quadriceps Muscle / Muscle Strength / Volleyball / Athletic Tape Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Man Ther Year: 2016 Document type: Article