Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs.
Dimitriou, D; Tsai, T-Y; Yue, B; Rubash, H E; Kwon, Y-M; Li, G.
Affiliation
  • Dimitriou D; Bioengineering laboratory, department of orthopaedic surgery, Massachusetts general hospital/Harvard medical school of Boston, 55, Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, Massachusetts MA 02114, USA.
  • Tsai TY; Bioengineering laboratory, department of orthopaedic surgery, Massachusetts general hospital/Harvard medical school of Boston, 55, Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, Massachusetts MA 02114, USA.
  • Yue B; Department of orthopedics, Ninth People's hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Rubash HE; Bioengineering laboratory, department of orthopaedic surgery, Massachusetts general hospital/Harvard medical school of Boston, 55, Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, Massachusetts MA 02114, USA.
  • Kwon YM; Bioengineering laboratory, department of orthopaedic surgery, Massachusetts general hospital/Harvard medical school of Boston, 55, Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, Massachusetts MA 02114, USA.
  • Li G; Bioengineering laboratory, department of orthopaedic surgery, Massachusetts general hospital/Harvard medical school of Boston, 55, Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, Massachusetts MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: gli1@mgh.harvard.edu.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 102(1): 91-7, 2016 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26867707
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The contralateral femur is often used as reference for reconstruction in unilateral hip joint pathology. The objective of this study was to quantify the side-to-side variation in proximal femur. We hypothesized that significant side-to-side differences exist between left and right femur with implications for preoperative planning and leg length discrepancy following hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

CT-based 3D femoral models were reconstructed for 122 paired femurs in 61 young healthy subjects (46.9±6.8 years) with no history of hip pathology. Side-to-side differences of several femoral morphologic parameters, including femoral head diameter, femoral anteversion, horizontal offset and femoral head center location, were compared and correlated with demographic factors using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS:

Significant side-to-side differences (P<0.01) were found in femoral anteversion (4.3±3.8°; range 0.2° to 17.3°), horizontal offset (2.5±2.1mm; range 0.1 to 10.3mm), and femoral head center location (7.1±3.8mm; range 0.5 to 19.4mm). The difference in femoral anteversion was strongly correlated with the difference in neck diameter (R(2)=0.79), whereas the difference in horizontal femoral offset was highly correlated with the head diameter difference (R(2)=0.72). Femoral head center difference was correlated with the femoral anteversion, horizontal offset and neck-shaft-angle difference (R(2)=0.82).

DISCUSSION:

Relying on the anatomic landmarks of the contralateral femur during hip arthroplasty may not necessarily result in restoration of native anatomy and leg-length. Knowledge of the baseline side-to-side asymmetry could provide a range of error that would be tolerable following hip reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV. TYPE OF STUDY Retrospective observational study.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femur Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Femur Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Year: 2016 Document type: Article