Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Challenges of kidney paired donation transplants involving multiple donor and recipient surgeons across Australia.
Allen, Richard D M; Pleass, Henry C C; Woodroffe, Claudia; Clayton, Philip A; Ferrari, Paolo.
Affiliation
  • Allen RDM; Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Pleass HCC; Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Woodroffe C; Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Clayton PA; Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ferrari P; Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(3): 167-171, 2018 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26947137
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Australian kidney paired donation program adopted the principles of within-chain simultaneous live donor surgery and of organ transport, with the requirement of keeping cold ischemia time (CIT) to <12 h. Whether these principles could be adhered to and what impact on transplant outcome they might have is unknown.

METHODS:

We evaluated the logistic challenges and outcomes of the first 100 kidney transplants performed in the Australian kidney paired donation program.

RESULTS:

Within 4 years, 17 donor surgeons at 12 centres were involved in 37 chain exchange surgeries. Sixteen kidneys were transplanted at the same hospital and 84 required transport to the recipient hospital. Mean (±SD) within chain anaesthetic induction time variability was 8 ± 18 min and mean individual surgeon operating time was 115 ± 44 min. In two cases, delays during donor surgery resulted in increased CIT by 1 h because of deferred transport. CIT was 2.6 ± 0.6 h for non-shipped and 6.8 ± 2.8 h for shipped kidneys, four kidneys had CIT of 12-14 h. Immediate allograft function was observed in 85% of recipients, with no difference between shipped and non-shipped kidneys. There were only two cases of delayed graft function requiring temporary dialysis; both had CIT <7 h. There was no difference in serum creatinine at 1 month between non-shipped and shipped kidneys (105 ± 26 versus 112 ± 50 µmol/L) and allograft survival at 1 year was 97%.

CONCLUSION:

The study provided a favourable audit of kidney transplant activity, despite challenges of simultaneous surgery, organ transport coordination and prolonged CIT. The decision to ship donor kidneys rather than the donor was demonstrated to be feasible and safe.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organ Preservation / Tissue and Organ Procurement / Kidney Transplantation / Living Donors / Cold Ischemia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: ANZ J Surg Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organ Preservation / Tissue and Organ Procurement / Kidney Transplantation / Living Donors / Cold Ischemia Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: ANZ J Surg Year: 2018 Document type: Article