Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3).
Wijnen, Bfm; Van Mastrigt, Gapg; Redekop, W K; Majoie, Hjm; De Kinderen, Rja; Evers, Smaa.
Affiliation
  • Wijnen B; a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
  • Van Mastrigt G; b Department of Research and Development , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe , Heeze , The Netherlands.
  • Redekop WK; a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
  • Majoie H; c Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
  • De Kinderen R; b Department of Research and Development , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe , Heeze , The Netherlands.
  • Evers S; d Department of Neurology, Academic Centre for Epileptology , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 16(6): 723-732, 2016 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27762640
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This article is part of the series "How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions" in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed. Areas covered This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE. Expert commentary Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic / Bias / Delivery of Health Care Type of study: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Year: 2016 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Review Literature as Topic / Bias / Delivery of Health Care Type of study: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Year: 2016 Document type: Article