Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the addition of organic acids in the feed and/or water for broilers and the subsequent recovery of Salmonella Typhimurium from litter and ceca.
Bourassa, D V; Wilson, K M; Ritz, C R; Kiepper, B K; Buhr, R J.
Affiliation
  • Bourassa DV; Poultry Microbiological Safety and Processing Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, GA, 30605-2702.
  • Wilson KM; Poultry Microbiological Safety and Processing Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, GA, 30605-2702.
  • Ritz CR; Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
  • Kiepper BK; Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
  • Buhr RJ; Department of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.
Poult Sci ; 97(1): 64-73, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29136237
ABSTRACT
Three separate broiler Salmonella Typhimurium challenge experiments were conducted evaluating efficacy of formic and propionic acid feed supplements to suppress environmental and cecal Salmonella Typhimurium prevalence. In experiment 1, broilers were provided feed with 1 kg/ton formic acid or 5 kg/ton propionic acid feed additives or a basal control diet. At the day of placement, half of the pens were inoculated with seeder chicks orally challenged with a marker strain of Salmonella Typhimurium and to yield challenged and adjacent nonchallenged pens. No differences in weekly litter samples or cecal Salmonella prevalence at 3 or 6 wk among feeding treatments were detected. In experiment 2, treatments were 2 kg/ton propionic acid in feed, 1.0 mL/L formic acid in water, both propionic acid in feed and formic acid in water, and a basal control. Every pen was challenged with seeder chicks inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium. By 6 wk all pens maintained detectable litter Salmonella, and broilers provided both propionic acid in feed and formic acid in water had the lowest cecal recovery (35%), compared to the control (60%). In experiment 3, treatments were formic acid at 4 or 6 kg/ton from wk 0 to 6 or for only the last wk, propionic acid at 5 or 10 kg/ton for only the last wk, and a basal control. Each pen was challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium inoculated seeder chicks. By 6 wk, broilers fed formic acid (4 kg/ton) for the entire growout had no Salmonella-positive ceca (0/30). All treatments that provided acid supplemented feed for only the last wk had 3-13% Salmonella-positive ceca. These experiments indicate that adding formic acid to broiler feed appears to prevent Salmonella colonization from challenge pens entering into the adjacent nonchallenge pens. Feeding formic acid (4 kg/ton) for 6 wk resulted in no recovery of Salmonella from ceca compared to the control prevalence of 17%.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 3_ND Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Propionates / Salmonella Infections, Animal / Salmonella typhimurium / Chickens / Dietary Supplements / Formates Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 3_ND Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Poultry Diseases / Propionates / Salmonella Infections, Animal / Salmonella typhimurium / Chickens / Dietary Supplements / Formates Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2018 Document type: Article