Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coping Flexibility as Predictor of Distress in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.
van Diemen, Tijn; van Nes, Ilse J W; Geertzen, Jan H B; Post, Marcel W M.
Affiliation
  • van Diemen T; Department of Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Cent
  • van Nes IJW; Department of Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Geertzen JHB; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Post MWM; Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation,
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(10): 2015-2021, 2018 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29966646
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Examine whether coping flexibility at admission to first spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation was predictive of distress 1 year after discharge.

DESIGN:

Longitudinal inception cohort study.

SETTING:

Rehabilitation center.

PARTICIPANTS:

Of the 210 people admitted to their first inpatient SCI rehabilitation program, 188 met the inclusion criteria. n=150 (80%) agreed to participate; the data of participants (N=113) with a complete dataset were used in the statistical analysis.

INTERVENTIONS:

Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Coping flexibility was operationalized by (1) flexible goal adjustment (FGA) to given situational forces and constraints and (2) tenacious goal pursuit (TGP) as a way of actively adjusting circumstances to personal preference. The Assimilative-Accommodative Coping Scale was used to measure FGA and TGP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess distress.

RESULTS:

Scores on FGA and TGP measured at admission were negatively associated with the scales depression (r= -.33 and -.41, respectively) and anxiety (r= -.23 and -.30, respectively) 1 year after discharge. All demographic and injury-related variables at admission together explained a small percentage of the variance of depression and anxiety. FGA, TGP, and the interaction term together explained a significant additional 16% of the variance of depression and 10% of anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS:

The tendency to pursue goals early postonset of the injury seems to have a protecting effect against distress 1 year after discharge. People with low TGP may experience protection against distress from high FGA.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Injuries / Stress, Psychological / Adaptation, Psychological / Inpatients Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Cord Injuries / Stress, Psychological / Adaptation, Psychological / Inpatients Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Year: 2018 Document type: Article