Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drug-Coated versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in Bypass Vein Grafts (the DRECOREST I-Study).
Björkman, Patrick; Kokkonen, Tatu; Albäck, Anders; Venermo, Maarit.
Affiliation
  • Björkman P; Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: patrick.bjorkman@hus.fi.
  • Kokkonen T; Department of Interventional Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Albäck A; Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Venermo M; Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 55: 36-44, 2019 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30092443
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stenosis is a known complication in bypass vein grafts for peripheral arterial disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of vein graft stenoses. DCBs may prevent restenosis in arterial lesions. One small prospective and larger retrospective and registry studies have failed to show benefit from DCBs in vein grafts. Prospective data are scarce.

METHODS:

Sixty patients treated for primary or recurrent stenosis in venous bypass grafts were randomized to DCB (n = 30) or standard balloon angioplasty (BA) (n = 30). Follow-up was 1 year. The primary outcome measure was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcome measures were assisted primary patency and secondary patency and graft occlusion.

RESULTS:

Fifty-seven patients were analyzed. Three patients were excluded due to primary technical failure (2 DCB, 1 BA). Overall TLR rate was 34.5% and 46.4% in the DCB and BA groups, respectively (P = 0.33). Five (8.8%) grafts occluded during follow-up (1 DCB, 4 BA). Assisted primary patency was 93.1% (DCB) versus 85.7% (BA) (P = 0.362) and secondary patency was 100% (DCB) versus 89.3% (BA) (P = 0.076). Subgroup analysis showed a significant benefit from DCB in the treatment of primary stenosis (TLR rate 15.0% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION:

There was no significant benefit from DCBs for treatment of vein graft stenosis compared to BA, although a trend in favor of DCBs could be seen. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT03023098.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saphenous Vein / Cardiovascular Agents / Angioplasty, Balloon / Coated Materials, Biocompatible / Peripheral Arterial Disease / Vascular Grafting / Vascular Access Devices / Graft Occlusion, Vascular Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Saphenous Vein / Cardiovascular Agents / Angioplasty, Balloon / Coated Materials, Biocompatible / Peripheral Arterial Disease / Vascular Grafting / Vascular Access Devices / Graft Occlusion, Vascular Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Year: 2019 Document type: Article