Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Insulin Degludec in Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Data on Effectiveness and Safety.
Ponzani, Paola; Berra, Cesare; Di Lelio, Alessandra; Del Sindaco, Paola; Di Loreto, Chiara; Reggiani, Francesco; Lucisano, Giuseppe; Rossi, Maria Chiara.
Affiliation
  • Ponzani P; SSD Endocrinologia, Diabetologia e Malattie Metaboliche ASL3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy.
  • Berra C; Humanitas Research Institute, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
  • Di Lelio A; CORESEARCH, Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.
  • Del Sindaco P; Servizio di Diabetologia del Perugino USL Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy.
  • Di Loreto C; Servizio di Diabetologia del Perugino USL Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy.
  • Reggiani F; Humanitas Research Institute, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
  • Lucisano G; CORESEARCH, Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy.
  • Rossi MC; CORESEARCH, Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Pescara, Italy. rossi@coresearch.it.
Diabetes Ther ; 9(6): 2209-2218, 2018 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30242611
INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with diabetes is a priority. The aim of the study was to evaluate patterns of use and the long-term effectiveness and safety of IDeg in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was an observational longitudinal study. A retrospective chart review of all patients with type 2 diabetes treated with IDeg was performed and temporal trends in clinical outcomes were assessed. All data was stratified by treatment modality: the switch group consisted of patients already treated with another basal insulin before initiating IDeg; the add-on group consisted of basal insulin-naïve patients. RESULTS: Overall, 247 patients were analyzed (55 in the add-on group and 192 in the switch group), mean age 67.0 ± 10.9 years ,and diabetes duration 16.3 ± 8.9 years. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 9.7 (8.0-11.9) months. In the add-on group, improvements were found in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (- 1.68%; p < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (- 64.7 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), post-prandial glucose (PPG) (- 81.1 mg/dl; p < 0.0001), and glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation of blood glucose) (- 11.6 mg/dl; p = 0.04). Even in the switch group, improvements were found in HbA1c (- 0.57%; p < 0.0001), FBG (- 28.1 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), and PPG (- 22.6 mg/dl; p = 0.001). Body weight increase during the follow-up was not statistically significant vs. baseline in both groups. Benefits on overall, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemia were found in the switch group. CONCLUSION: These real-world data documented that initiating IDeg or switching to IDeg from other basal insulins in type 2 diabetes was associated with significant improvement in metabolic control without significant weight gain; a decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia was observed when switching to IDeg from another basal insulin.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Diabetes Ther Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Diabetes Ther Year: 2018 Document type: Article