Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Class II HLA Eplet Mismatch Is a Risk Factor for De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody Development and Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation Recipients.
Kishikawa, H; Kinoshita, T; Hashimoto, M; Fukae, S; Taniguchi, A; Yamanaka, K; Nakagawa, M; Nishimura, K.
Affiliation
  • Kishikawa H; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan. Electronic address: hidefumi69@hotmail.com.
  • Kinoshita T; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Hashimoto M; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Fukae S; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Taniguchi A; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Yamanaka K; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Nakagawa M; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Nishimura K; Department of Renal Transplantation Center, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Transplant Proc ; 50(8): 2388-2391, 2018 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30316363
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We investigated the correlation between class II HLA epitope mismatch and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) episodes in kidney transplant recipients. In patients with AMR, epitope mismatch was also examined for each class II HLA mismatch to determine development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective study of 167 kidney recipients. The numbers of eplet mismatches were compared between those with (n = 12) and without (n = 155) AMR, and the numbers of eplet mismatches for each type of mismatch in class II HLA among the AMR patients was also compared.

RESULTS:

Twelve AMR episodes were diagnosed. The total number of eplet mismatches in AMR patients with either HLA-DR or HLA-DQ was greater than those in non-AMR patients (P = .0085 and P = .0041, respectively), though the incidence of HLA class II (DRB1 + DQB) mismatch was not significantly different between the groups (P = .095). The rate of non-AMR status in patients with ≥15 was lower than those with <15 HLA class II (DR or DQ) eplet mismatches (P = .0299 and P = .0128, respectively). Twelve AMR patients had 30 HLA-DRB1/3/4/5 and 32 HLA-DQA/B mismatches. In both HLA-DR and -DQ, de novo DSAs developed against HLAs in association with a greater number of eplet mismatches (P = .0046 and P = .0044, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Class II HLA eplet mismatch is a risk factor for de novo DSA and AMR in kidney transplantation recipients. Furthermore, the number of HLA class II eplet mismatches has greater significance as a risk factor than the number of conventional HLA class II mismatches.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Histocompatibility Antigens Class II / Kidney Transplantation / Graft Rejection Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Histocompatibility Antigens Class II / Kidney Transplantation / Graft Rejection Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2018 Document type: Article