Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experiences With Medical Exemptions After a Change in Vaccine Exemption Policy in California.
Mohanty, Salini; Buttenheim, Alison M; Joyce, Caroline M; Howa, Amanda C; Salmon, Daniel; Omer, Saad B.
Affiliation
  • Mohanty S; Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; smohanty@upenn.edu.
  • Buttenheim AM; Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Joyce CM; Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Howa AC; Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Salmon D; Hubert Department of Global Health and.
  • Omer SB; Department of International Health and Health Behavior Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pediatrics ; 142(5)2018 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30373910
: media-1vid110.1542/5804909532001PEDS-VA_2018-1051Video Abstract OBJECTIVES: In 2015, California passed Senate Bill 227 (SB277), eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions for school entry. Our objective for this study was to describe the experiences of health officers and immunization staff addressing medical exemption requests under SB277. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews between August 2017 and September 2017 with health officers and immunization staff from local health jurisdictions in California. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for key themes. RESULTS: We conducted 34 interviews with 40 health officers and immunization staff representing 35 of the 61 local health jurisdictions in California. Four main themes emerged related to experiences with medical exemptions: (1) the role of stakeholders, (2) reviewing medical exemptions received by schools, (3) medical exemptions that were perceived as problematic, and (4) frustration and concern over medical exemptions. Generally, local health jurisdictions described a narrow role in providing support and technical assistance to schools. Only 5 jurisdictions actively tracked medical exemptions received by schools, with 1 jurisdiction facing a lawsuit as a result. Examples were provided of medical exemptions that listed family history of allergies and autoimmune diseases as contraindications for immunization and of physicians charging steep fees for medical exemptions. Participants also reported concerns about the increase in medical exemptions after the implementation of SB277. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported many challenges and concerns with medical exemptions under SB277. Without additional legal changes, including a standardized review of medical exemptions, some physicians may continue to write medical exemptions for vaccine-hesitant parents, potentially limiting the long-term impact of SB277.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 14_ODS3_health_workforce / 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Schools / Vaccination / Health Policy Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 14_ODS3_health_workforce / 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Schools / Vaccination / Health Policy Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Pediatrics Year: 2018 Document type: Article