Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal balloon positioning for the proximal optimization technique? An experimental bench study.
Dérimay, François; Rioufol, Gilles; Nishi, Takeshi; Kobayashi, Yuhei; Fearon, William F; Veziers, Joëlle; Guérin, Patrice; Finet, Gérard.
Affiliation
  • Dérimay F; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Hospital and INSERM Unit 1060 CARMEN, Lyon, France; Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto VA Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: francois.derimay@chu-lyon.fr.
  • Rioufol G; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Hospital and INSERM Unit 1060 CARMEN, Lyon, France.
  • Nishi T; Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto VA Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Kobayashi Y; Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto VA Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Fearon WF; Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto VA Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Veziers J; CHU Nantes, PHU4 OTONN, Nantes, F-44093, France.
  • Guérin P; CHU Nantes, PHU4 OTONN, Nantes, F-44093, France.
  • Finet G; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Hospital and INSERM Unit 1060 CARMEN, Lyon, France.
Int J Cardiol ; 292: 95-97, 2019 10 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31130279
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting improves apposition and side-branch obstruction. The POT balloon should be positioned with the distal radio-opaque marker at the carina cut plane. However, the real impact of positioning remains unknown. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Synergy™ stents (Boston Scientific, USA) were implanted on left-main fractal bench models. Initial POT was performed in 3 positions according to distal shoulder position (loss of balloon parallelism) relative to the carina cut plane (n = 5/group) i) "proximal", 1 mm before carina; ii) "medium", just at carina; iii) "distal", 1 mm after carina. Results were quantified on 2D- and 3D-OCT. Compared to implantation, initial POT improved malapposition in all positions ("proximal" 61.5 ±â€¯1.4% vs. 5.1 ±â€¯2.7%; "medium" 60.2 ±â€¯2.4% vs. 1.3 ±â€¯0.6%; "distal" 60.5 ±â€¯2.9% vs. 1.1 ±â€¯1.8%, p < 0.05). However, residual malapposition was greater in "proximal" position (p < 0.05). "Proximal", unlike "medium" or "distal" POT, also failed to improve side-branch obstruction. Conversely, "distal" POT significantly overstretched the main-branch ostium, with stent/artery ratio 1.22 ±â€¯0.04 vs. 1.11 ±â€¯0.07 for "medium" POT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Shoulder positioning is essential to optimize the mechanical benefit of POT without main-branch overstretch (too distal position). Experimentally, the best position is just at the carina cut plane ("medium").
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Stents Language: En Journal: Int J Cardiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Stents Language: En Journal: Int J Cardiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article