Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-year experience of a dedicated prostate mpMRI pre-biopsy programme and effect on timed cancer diagnostic pathways.
Barrett, T; Slough, R; Sushentsev, N; Shaida, N; Koo, B C; Caglic, I; Kozlov, V; Warren, A Y; Thankappannair, V; Pinnock, C; Shah, N; Saeb-Parsy, K; Gnanapragasam, V J; Sala, E; Kastner, C.
Affiliation
  • Barrett T; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: tristan.barrett@addenbrookes.nhs.uk.
  • Slough R; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Sushentsev N; Sechenov Biomedical Science & Technology Park, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Shaida N; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Koo BC; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Caglic I; Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
  • Kozlov V; Department of Public Health and Healthcare Organisation, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Warren AY; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Thankappannair V; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pinnock C; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Clinical Excellence Research Centre, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
  • Shah N; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Saeb-Parsy K; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Gnanapragasam VJ; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Sala E; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Kastner C; CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Clin Radiol ; 74(11): 894.e1-894.e9, 2019 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288924
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the effect of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on cancer diagnostic times, and to report MRI-directed pathology outcomes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In total, 1483 patients were referred with prostate cancer suspicion during a 30-month period. Upfront MRI was performed in 745 patients 332 MRIs in the 15 months prior to dedicated scanning slots (group 1), and 413 in the 15 months post-introduction (group 2). A further 88 patients had initial MRI following clinical assessment. Biopsy via the transrectal (TR) or transperineal (TP) approach was performed, with MRI/ultrasound fusion for MRI targets. Clinically significant cancer (csPCa) was defined as Gleason ≥3+4. Negative MRIs were defined as Likert 1-2. Per-case clinical decisions were taken to biopsy or not.

RESULTS:

44.4% of patients avoided biopsy. 484/833 (58.1%) MRIs were negative; 37.4% of these patients had biopsy with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.8% for Gleason ≥3+4 and 98.3% for ≥4+3. Overall prostate cancer prevalence was 34.3% (24.6% csPCa). In 323 MRI-positive cases, any cancer was present in 78.9% (csPCa 60.4%). Of the 1483 patients, 1232 (83.1%) completed all diagnostic tests within 28 days. Upfront MRI patients met this standard in 621/833 (74.5%), improving from 66.9% to 81.1% with reserved slots (group 2) with a reduced diagnostic time from median 25.5 to 20.9 days. Biopsy scheduling delayed the pathway in 69.7%, with MRI responsible in 22.3%, reducing to 10.3% in group 2. TP biopsies met the 28-day standard in significantly less cases (29.7%), compared to TR (67.4%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION:

Reserved MRI slots reduces time-to-diagnosis, and upfront MRI safely avoids biopsy in a significant proportion of men, whilst maintaining expected csPCa detection rates.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Prostatic Neoplasms / Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostate / Prostatic Neoplasms / Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Radiol Year: 2019 Document type: Article