Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process.
Konradsson, M; van Berge Henegouwen, M I; Bruns, C; Chaudry, M A; Cheong, E; Cuesta, M A; Darling, G E; Gisbertz, S S; Griffin, S M; Gutschow, C A; van Hillegersberg, R; Hofstetter, W; Hölscher, A H; Kitagawa, Y; van Lanschot, J J B; Lindblad, M; Ferri, L E; Low, D E; Luyer, M D P; Ndegwa, N; Mercer, S; Moorthy, K; Morse, C R; Nafteux, P; Nieuwehuijzen, G A P; Pattyn, P; Rosman, C; Ruurda, J P; Räsänen, J; Schneider, P M; Schröder, W; Sgromo, B; Van Veer, H; Wijnhoven, B P L; Nilsson, M.
Affiliation
  • Konradsson M; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • van Berge Henegouwen MI; Department of Gastroenterology, Landspitali National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Bruns C; Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Chaudry MA; Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Cheong E; Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
  • Cuesta MA; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
  • Darling GE; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Gisbertz SS; Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Griffin SM; Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam.
  • Gutschow CA; Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • van Hillegersberg R; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hofstetter W; Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Hölscher AH; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Kitagawa Y; Centre for Esophageal and Gastric Surgery, AGAPLESION Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • van Lanschot JJB; Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
  • Lindblad M; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ferri LE; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Low DE; Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Luyer MDP; Department of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Ndegwa N; Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Mercer S; Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Moorthy K; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Morse CR; Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
  • Nafteux P; The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Nieuwehuijzen GAP; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Pattyn P; Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Rosman C; Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Belgium.
  • Ruurda JP; Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  • Räsänen J; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Schneider PM; Department of surgery, Radboud university center Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Schröder W; Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Sgromo B; Department of General, Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Van Veer H; The Center for Visceral, Thoracic and Specialized Tumor Surgery, Hirslanden Medical Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Wijnhoven BPL; Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Nilsson M; Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Dis Esophagus ; 33(4)2020 Apr 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608938
ABSTRACT
Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophageal Motility Disorders / Esophagectomy / Symptom Assessment Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Dis Esophagus Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophageal Neoplasms / Esophageal Motility Disorders / Esophagectomy / Symptom Assessment Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Dis Esophagus Year: 2020 Document type: Article