Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tracking Changes in US Organizations' Workplace Health Promotion Initiatives: A Longitudinal Analysis of Performance Against Quality Benchmarks.
Weaver, GracieLee M; Bibeau, Daniel L; Rulison, Kelly; Bray, Jeremy; Dudley, William N; Unsal, Nilay.
Affiliation
  • Weaver GM; Office of Research & Engagement, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Bibeau DL; Department of Public Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Rulison K; Department of Public Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Bray J; Department of Economics, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Dudley WN; Department of Public Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Unsal N; Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Economics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Health Promot ; 34(2): 142-149, 2020 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31645115
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To examine changes in organizations' workplace health promotion (WHP) initiatives over time associated with repeated self-assessment using the Well Workplace Checklist (WWC).

DESIGN:

Well Workplace Checklist data include a convenience sample of US organizations that selected to assess their performance against quality WHP benchmarks.

SETTING:

Workplaces.

SUBJECTS:

In total, 577 US organizations completed the WWC in 2 or more years from 2008 to 2015.

MEASURES:

The WWC is a 100-item organizational assessment that measures performance against the original set of quality benchmarks that were established by the Wellness Council of America (WELCOA).

ANALYSIS:

This study examined changes in overall WWC scores as well as 7 separate benchmark scores. Multilevel modeling was used to examine changes in scores associated with repeated assessments, controlling for the year of assessment and organizational characteristics.

RESULTS:

There were significant increases in overall WWC scores (ß = 2.93, P < .001) associated with the repeated WWC assessments, after controlling for organizational characteristics. All 7 benchmark scores had significant increases associated with reassessment. Compared to other benchmarks, operating plan (ß = 6.18, P < .001) and evaluation (ß = 4.91, P < .001) scores increased more with each reassessment.

CONCLUSION:

Continued reassessment may represent more commitment to and investment in WHP initiatives which could lead to improved quality. Other factors that may positively influence changes in performance against benchmarks include company size, access to outside resources for WHP, and a history with implementing WHP.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Workplace / Benchmarking / Health Promotion Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Health Promot Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Workplace / Benchmarking / Health Promotion Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Health Promot Year: 2020 Document type: Article