Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective reinterpretation and reclassification of BRCA1/2 variants from Chinese population.
Li, Dan; Shi, Yujian; Li, Ang; Cao, Dandan; Su, Huijun; Yang, Haiqi; Zhi, Qihuan; Yang, Yuchen; Lan, Zhaoji; Zhou, Tianliangwen; You, Xiaobin; Hu, Guifang.
Affiliation
  • Li D; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
  • Shi Y; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Li A; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Cao D; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Su H; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Yang H; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhi Q; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Yang Y; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Lan Z; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhou T; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • You X; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
  • Hu G; Top Gene Tech (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Breast Cancer ; 27(6): 1158-1167, 2020 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32566972
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The accurate interpretation of BRCA1/2 variants becomes increasingly important in breast cancer and other related cancers including ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer and so forth. In the past decades, especially before year 2015, limitations of techniques and lack of databases and guidelines have led to possible misinterpretation of the clinical significance of sequence variants of BRCA1/2. A published study reported reclassification of some BRCA1/2 variants previously classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to likely pathogenic in breast or ovarian cancer patients from Korea. However, little is known about the situation in Chinese population.

METHODS:

We retrospectively retrieved 109 publications studying about BRCA1/2 variants of Chinese population from the year 1999 to year 2019 (March). After excluding publications of meta-analysis and publications with missing data, 72 publications were eventually retained for subsequent analysis. In total, 1,351 BRCA variants (673 BRCA1 variants and 678 BRCA2 variants) derived from 42,430 Chinese cancer patients were standardized and reinterpreted using ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines and China Expert Consensus on BRCA variant interpretation by genetic counselors.

RESULTS:

Among the 1,351 BRCA variants, the majority of interpretation (91.7%, 1,239/1,351) remained the same as previously published. However, there were 112 (8.3%, 112/1,351) variants (64 BRCA1, 48 BRCA2) reclassified with different categories.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results demonstrated that clinical significance of not only VUS, but also pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants varied from time to time in the Chinese population. Precise reinterpretation of BRCA1/2 variants is of crucial importance to genetic counseling or clinical decision-making for risk individuals or patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Genetic Testing / Breast Neoplasms, Male / BRCA1 Protein / BRCA2 Protein / Asian People Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Genetic Testing / Breast Neoplasms, Male / BRCA1 Protein / BRCA2 Protein / Asian People Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Year: 2020 Document type: Article