Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in Trauma Quality Improvement Program centers: Temporal trends and future directions.
Guttman, Matthew P; Tillmann, Bourke W; Pannell, Dylan; Vallelonga, Mark; Nathens, Avery B; Haas, Barbara.
Affiliation
  • Guttman MP; From the Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (M.P.G., B.W.T., A.B.N., B.H.), Department of Surgery (M.P.G., D.P., A.B.N., B.H.), Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine (B.W.T., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Royal Canadian Medical Service (D.P.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (M.P.G., B.W.T., D.P., M.V., A.B.N., B.H.); and Sunnybrook Research Institute (A.B.N., B.H.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(2): 351-357, 2020 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32744831
BACKGROUND: Increased clinical experience and the decreased need for systemic anticoagulation have renewed interest in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for posttraumatic respiratory and cardiopulmonary failure. The objectives of this study were to describe the incidence and temporal trends of ECMO use at trauma centers, the outcomes of trauma patients undergoing ECMO, and the characteristics of trauma centers providing ECMO. METHODS: Data were derived from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set. We included adults with at least one severe injury admitted to a level I or II trauma center between 2012 and 2016 who received at least 1 day of mechanical ventilation. Patients were categorized based on whether or not they received ECMO during their admission. The primary outcome was change in the incidence of ECMO across study years. We also evaluated patient outcomes and variation in ECMO volumes across centers. RESULTS: Of 194,314 severely injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation across 450 centers, 269 (0.14%) received ECMO. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients had significantly higher mortality than non-ECMO patients (32% vs. 19%). The standardized rate of ECMO from 2012 to 2016 increased significantly from 75.2 to 179.0 cases per 100,000 severely injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. The average annual growth rate was 24%. Of the 82 centers(18%) reporting at least 1 ECMO trauma case, 34 (41%) reported only a single case. CONCLUSION: The use of ECMO for trauma, although rare, is rapidly increasing. Two thirds of patients who receive ECMO following traumatic injury survive their hospitalization. These data suggest that ECMO represents a potential treatment strategy for trauma patients with respiratory or cardiopulmonary failure. However, given the rarity of the procedure, there exists an opportunity to develop practice guidelines regarding the indications for, and approach to, ECMO in the setting of trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 15_ODS3_global_health_risks Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Insufficiency / Trauma Centers / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Emergency Service, Hospital / Quality Improvement / Heart Failure Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Implementation_research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 15_ODS3_global_health_risks Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Insufficiency / Trauma Centers / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Emergency Service, Hospital / Quality Improvement / Heart Failure Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Implementation_research Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2020 Document type: Article