Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surface Contact Features, Impact Obliquity, and Preimpact Rotational Motion in Concussive Helmet-to-Ground Impacts: Assessment via a New Impact Test Device.
Kent, Richard; Forman, Jason; Bailey, Ann; Cormier, Joseph; Park, Gwansik; Crandall, Jeff; Arbogast, Kristy B; Myers, Barry.
Affiliation
  • Kent R; Biomechanics Consulting and Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA. rwk3c@virginia.edu.
  • Forman J; Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. rwk3c@virginia.edu.
  • Bailey A; Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Cormier J; Biomechanics Consulting and Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Park G; Biomechanics Consulting and Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Crandall J; Biomechanics Consulting and Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Arbogast KB; Biomechanics Consulting and Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Myers B; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 48(11): 2639-2651, 2020 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32964361
ABSTRACT
This paper reports the development of a test device for replicating unique features of concussion-causing helmet-to-ground impacts. Helmet-to-ground impacts are characterized by an oblique impact velocity vector, preimpact rotational motion of the helmeted head, and an impact into a compliant frictional surface of unknown effective mass. No helmet assessment testing program replicates these impact characteristics, yet they influence brain injury risk and therefore may influence helmet design priorities. To replicate these mechanics, the carriage of a drop tower was modified by the addition of a curvilinear bearing track and a hinged torso-neck fixture to which a helmeted head of a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device was mounted. Preimpact rotational motion of the head was imparted by forcing a link arm to follow the curvilinear path as the carriage fell under gravity. At impact, the rotating helmeted head struck a vertically mounted surface. The ground impact features of head kinematics are illustrated by comparing rear impacts into a rigid, low-friction surface against those into a compliant frictional surface simulating turf. With the rigid, low-friction surface, the head experienced a change in rotational rate of approximately 40 rad/s, which corresponded to a peak rotational acceleration of approximately αy = - 4000 rad/s2. In contrast, peak rotational acceleration with the compliant frictional surface was approximately αy = - 1000 rad/s2 while the helmet was in contact with the surface. Neck loads were significantly greater with the compliant frictional surface. Translational head acceleration was less sensitive to the surface characteristics, with the peak of the anterior-posterior component essentially unchanged.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Concussion / Neck Injuries / Football / Head Protective Devices / Models, Biological Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Concussion / Neck Injuries / Football / Head Protective Devices / Models, Biological Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Year: 2020 Document type: Article