Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic-assisted resection for beyond TME rectal cancer: a novel classification and analysis from a specialized center.
Piozzi, G N; Lee, T-H; Kwak, J-M; Kim, J; Kim, S-H.
Affiliation
  • Piozzi GN; Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
  • Lee TH; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
  • Kwak JM; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SH; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Goryodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Updates Surg ; 73(3): 1103-1114, 2021 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068271
ABSTRACT
Locally advanced rectal cancer often requires an extended resection beyond the total mesorectal excision plane (bTME) to obtain clear resection margins. We classified three types of bTME rectal cancer following local disease diffusion radial (adjacent pelvic organs), lateral (pelvic lateral lymph nodes) and longitudinal (below 3.5 cm from the anal verge, submitted to intersphincteric resection). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the application of robotic surgery to the three types of bTME regarding the short and long-term oncological outcomes. Secondary aim was to identify survival prognostic factors for bTME rectal cancers. A total of 137 patients who underwent robotic-assisted bTME procedures between 2008 and 2018 were extracted from a prospectively collected database. Patient-related, operative and pathological factors were assessed. Morbidity was moderately high with 66% of patients reporting postoperative complications. Median follow up was 47 months (IQR, 31.5-66.5). Local recurrence rate was 15.3% with a statistical difference between the three types of bTME (p = 0.041). Disease progression/distant metastasis rate was 33.6%. Overall survival was significantly different (p = 0.023) with 1- and 3-years rates of 77.8% and 55.0% (radial; n = 19); 96.6% and 84.8% (lateral; n = 30); 97.7% and 86.9% (longitudinal; n = 88). No statistical difference was observed for disease-free survival (p = 0.897). Local recurrence-free survival was significantly different between the groups (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that (y)pT (p = 0.028; HR (95% CI) 5.133 (1.192-22.097)), (y)pN (p = 0.014; HR (95% CI) 2.835 (1.240-6.482)) and type of bTME were associated to OS whilst (y)pT (p = 0.072) and type of bTME were not associated to LRFS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Updates Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Updates Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article