Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids?

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The paper compares shear wave elastography (SWE), strain elastography (SE) and magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient (MRI ADC) values, to evaluate their efficacy for differentiating between adenomyosis (AM) and uterine fibroids (UF). METHODS: Patients who were scheduled for hysterectomy for AM or UFs, with a preliminary diagnosis, were additionally evaluated before surgery by transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound elastography. SE of patients were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound, and SWE of patients and control subjects were evaluated by transabdominal ultrasound. Then, the patients with a definitive histopathological diagnosis as AM or UFs were evaluated retrospectively and compared to the control group without myometrial pathology. In addition, MRI images of patients with UFs and AM were examined for ADC values. RESULTS: The results of 98 patients in the UF group, 37 patients in the AM group, and 40 volunteers with a healthy myometrium in the control group were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in age and body mass index between the groups (P > 0.05). Uterine size was significantly higher in the UF and AM group than the control group (P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between strain ratio (mean), strain ratio (max), and ADC values between the UF and AM groups (P < 0.001 for all three). There was a statistically significant difference in elastography scores distribution between the groups (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the UF and control (P < 0.001) and between the UF and AM (P < 0.001) groups in terms of SWE (kilopascal (kPa)) averages (P < 0.001). We found that none of these discrimination methods were statistically superior to each other in differentiating the UFs from the AM. CONCLUSION: In the differentiation of myometrial pathologies in gynecological imaging, both SE and SWE are cheaper, provide faster results, are non-invasive and easy to apply, and hence are as promising as the more expensive MRI ADC. Our study is the first to use both modalities of elastography and MRI ADC values together, compare these methods with each other and confirm the results pathologically.