Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immunogenicity and safety profiles of a new MAV/06 strain varicella vaccine in healthy children: A multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled phase III study.
Choi, Ui Yoon; Kim, Ki Hwan; Lee, Jin; Eun, Byung Wook; Kim, Dong Ho; Ma, Sang Hyuk; Kim, Chun Soo; Lapphra, Keswadee; Tangsathapornpong, Auchara; Kosalaraksa, Pope; Oberdorfer, Peninnah; Kim, Hwang Min; Shin, Son Moon; Kang, Jin Han.
Affiliation
  • Choi UY; Department of Pediatrics, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: uiyoon@catholic.ac.kr.
  • Kim KH; Department of Pediatrics, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: poohwa99@gmail.com.
  • Lee J; Department of Pediatrics, Hanil General Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: pedleejin@naver.com.
  • Eun BW; Department of Pediatrics, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: acet0125@hanmail.net.
  • Kim DH; Department of Pediatrics, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kdh281920@gmail.com.
  • Ma SH; Department of Pediatrics, Changwon Fatima Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: msh6517@hanmail.net.
  • Kim CS; Department of Pediatrics, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: cskim@dsmc.or.kr.
  • Lapphra K; Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: keswadee@gmail.com.
  • Tangsathapornpong A; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Klong Luang, Thailand. Electronic address: dr.auchara@yahoo.com.
  • Kosalaraksa P; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. Electronic address: pkosalaraksa@gmail.com.
  • Oberdorfer P; Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Electronic address: oberdorferp@gmail.com.
  • Kim HM; Department of Pediatrics, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: khm9120@yonsei.ac.kr.
  • Shin SM; Department of Pediatrics, Cheil General Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: smshinmd@hanmail.net.
  • Kang JH; Department of Pediatrics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Vaccine Bio Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kjhan@catholic.ac.kr.
Vaccine ; 39(12): 1758-1764, 2021 03 19.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33627245
ABSTRACT
Immunization is the most effective preventive strategy against varicella. While the Oka strain is commonly used for varicella vaccination worldwide, Korea widely uses the MAV/06 strain. A new live attenuated MAV/06 strain varicella vaccine (MG1111), which uses the new cell line Medical Research Council-5 for better viral propagation, was developed. MG1111 was approved by Korean health authorities. Here, we report the results of phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study conducted in Korea and Thailand, which compared the immunogenicity and safety profiles of MG1111 versus the control vaccine, VarivaxTM. In total, 515 healthy children (12 month-12 years) were randomized 11 to receive either the MG1111 or control vaccine (MG1111 258, Control 257). The seroconversion rate (SCR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) were measured using the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA) test. The MG1111 group achieved a SCR of 97.9% (95% CI 95.2-99.3) after vaccination. The lower limit of 95% CI for SCR difference (MG1111-VarivaxTM) was -4.0%, which was higher than the specified non-inferiority margin of -10%. Further, the GMT of the MG1111 increased from 2.0 to 74.2 (95% CI 65.0-84.8) and the lower limits of the 95% CI for post-vaccination GMT ratios (MG1111/VarivaxTM) were 0.55 higher than the specified parameter of 0.5. Therefore, the MG1111 group was not statistically inferior to the control vaccine group in terms of SCR and GMT. Furthermore, the MG1111 and control vaccine groups were not significantly different in the percentage of participants showing adverse events-solicited, local, or systemic during 43-day period of observation and serious adverse events during 6 month of observation. The present results indicate that MG1111was not immunologically inferior to VarivaxTM, and safety profiles of MG1111 are similar to those of VarivaxTM.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chickenpox / Chickenpox Vaccine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Vaccine Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Chickenpox / Chickenpox Vaccine Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Vaccine Year: 2021 Document type: Article