Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer.
Ryoo, S-B; Park, J W; Lee, D W; Lee, M A; Kwon, Y-H; Kim, M J; Moon, S H; Jeong, S-Y; Park, K J.
Affiliation
  • Ryoo SB; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JW; Colorectal Cancer Centre, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee DW; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee MA; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kwon YH; Colorectal Cancer Centre, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim MJ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Moon SH; Centre for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, Korea.
  • Jeong SY; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park KJ; Colorectal Cancer Centre, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Br J Surg ; 108(6): 644-651, 2021 06 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33982068
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

No effective treatment exists for anterior resection syndrome (ARS) following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. This RCT assessed the safety and efficacy of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ramosetron, for ARS.

METHODS:

A single-centre, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial was conducted. Male patients with ARS 1 month after rectal cancer surgery or ileostomy reversal were enrolled and randomly assigned (1 1) to 5 µg of ramosetron (Irribow®) daily or conservative treatment for 4 weeks. Low ARS (LARS) score was calculated after randomization and 4 weeks after treatment. The study was designed as a superiority test with a primary endpoint of the proportion of patients with major LARS between the groups. Primary outcome analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events during the study.

RESULTS:

A total of 100 patients were randomized to the ramosetron (49 patients) or conservative treatment group (51 patients). Two patients were excluded, and 48 and 50 patients were analysed in the ramosetron and control groups, respectively. The proportion of major LARS after 4 weeks was 58 per cent (28 of 48 patients) in the ramosetron group versus 82 per cent (41 of 50 patients) in the control group, with a difference of 23.7 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 5.58 to 39.98, P = 0.011). There were minor adverse events in five patients, which were hard stool, frequent stool or anal pain. These were not different between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION:

Ramosetron could be safe and feasible for male patients with ARS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02869984 (http//www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Benzimidazoles / Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists / Proctectomy Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Benzimidazoles / Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists / Proctectomy Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article