Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impaction in the Esophagus: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ooi, Marie; Duong, Tuan; Holman, Richard; Huynh, Dep; Lafta, Abdulnasser; Grimpen, Florian; Appleyard, Mark; Rayner, Chris K; Nguyen, Nam Q.
Affiliation
  • Ooi M; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Duong T; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Holman R; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Huynh D; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Lafta A; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Grimpen F; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Appleyard M; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Rayner CK; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Nguyen NQ; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(11): 2235-2240, 2021 11 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34543257
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

"Push" or "pull" techniques with the use of snares, forceps, baskets, and grasping devices are conventionally used to manage esophageal food bolus impaction (FBI). A novel cap-assisted technique has recently been advocated to reduce time taken for food bolus (FB) removal. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the cap-assisted technique against conventional methods of esophageal FB removal in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS:

Consecutive patients with esophageal FBI requiring endoscopic removal, from 3 Australian tertiary hospitals between 2017 and 2019, were randomized to either the cap-assisted technique or the conventional technique. Primary outcomes were technical success and FB retrieval time. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate, en bloc removal rate, procedure-related complication, length of hospital stay, and cost of consumables.

RESULTS:

Over 24 months, 342 patients with esophageal FBI were randomized to a cap-assisted (n = 171) or conventional (n = 171) technique. Compared with the conventional approach, the cap-assisted technique was associated with (i) shorter FB retrieval time (4.5 ± 0.5 minutes vs 21.7 ± 0.9 minutes, P < 0.001), (ii) shorter total procedure time (23.0 ± 0.6 minutes vs 47.0 ± 1.3 minutes, P < 0.0001), (iii) higher technical success rate (170/171 vs 160/171, P < 0.001), (iv) higher rate of en bloc removal (159/171 vs 48/171, P < 0.001), and (v) lower rate of procedure-related mucosal tear and bleeding (0/171 vs 13/171, P < 0.001). There were no major adverse events or deaths within 30 days in either group. The total cost of consumables was higher in the conventional group (A$19,644.90 vs A$6,239.90).

DISCUSSION:

This multicenter randomized controlled trial confirmed that the cap-assisted technique is more effective and less costly than the conventional approach and should be first-line treatment for esophageal FBI.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophagoscopy / Esophagus / Food / Foreign Bodies Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Postoperative Complications / Esophagoscopy / Esophagus / Food / Foreign Bodies Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Year: 2021 Document type: Article