Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.
Volz, L; Collins-Fekete, C-A; Bär, E; Brons, S; Graeff, C; Johnson, R P; Runz, A; Sarosiek, C; Schulte, R W; Seco, J.
Affiliation
  • Volz L; Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Collins-Fekete CA; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Bär E; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Brons S; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Graeff C; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Johnson RP; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Universitäts Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Runz A; Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Sarosiek C; Department of Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States of America.
  • Schulte RW; Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Therapy, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Seco J; Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, United States of America.
Phys Med Biol ; 66(23)2021 11 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34706355
ABSTRACT
This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm-1for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm-1for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm-1and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm-1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, -1.40%, -0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Protons / Helium Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Phys Med Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Protons / Helium Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Phys Med Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article