Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A case report of ventricular septal defect complicating transcatheter aortic valve implant for aortic regurgitation: novel complication and technical considerations.
Hartnett, Jack; Brandon, Lisa; Waterhouse, Deirdre; Murphy, Ross T; Walsh, Kevin P; Spence, Mark S; Maree, Andrew O.
Affiliation
  • Hartnett J; Department of Cardiology, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8 D08 W9RT, Ireland.
  • Brandon L; Department of Cardiology, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8 D08 W9RT, Ireland.
  • Waterhouse D; Department of Cardiology, Blackrock Clinic, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co Dublin A94 E4X7, Ireland.
  • Murphy RT; Department of Cardiology, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8 D08 W9RT, Ireland.
  • Walsh KP; Department of Cardiology, Blackrock Clinic, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co Dublin A94 E4X7, Ireland.
  • Spence MS; Department of Cardiology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital Crumlin, Dublin 12 D12 N512, Ireland.
  • Maree AO; Department of Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Trust, 274 Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 5(10): ytab387, 2021 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34738062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven efficacy in the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS). Understandably, there is increasing enthusiasm for its use to treat aortic regurgitation (AR). However, there are significant anatomical differences between AS and AR which make TAVI for AR more complex. CASE

SUMMARY:

We present the case of technically challenging TAVI for severe AR, which was complicated by a traumatic ventricular septal defect (VSD) that required percutaneous closure. To our knowledge, this is the first published case of VSD post-TAVI for AR.

DISCUSSION:

This unanticipated complication highlights anatomical differences between TAVI use in AS and AR. Lack of aortic valve calcification and excessive annular compliance made stable deployment of a self-expanding valve extremely challenging. Despite device oversizing, repeated embolization of the prosthesis into the left ventricular outflow tract traumatized the interventricular septum.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep Year: 2021 Document type: Article