Inequalities in recovery or methodological artefact? A comparison of models across physical and mental health functioning.

Jatta, Salmela; Ian, Brunton-Smith; Robert, Meadows

Jatta, Salmela; Ian, Brunton-Smith; Robert, Meadows.

Affiliation

Jatta S; Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8 B, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Ian BS; Department of Sociology, Elizabeth Fry Building (AD), University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Robert M; Department of Sociology, Elizabeth Fry Building (AD), University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.

SSM Popul Health ; 17: 101067, 2022 Mar.

Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35284618

Key words

AMI, Acute myocardial infarction; APP, Average posterior probability; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; CI, Confidence interval; GBTM, Group-based trajectory modelling; GCSE, General Certificate of Secondary Education; Health inequalities; MCS, Mental component summary; OCC, Odds of correct classification; OR, Odds ratio; PCS, Physical component summary; Recovery; SES, Socioeconomic status; SF-12, 12-Item Short Form Survey; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Survey; Socioeconomic inequalities; Trajectory modelling; United Kingdom

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Equity_inequality Language: En Journal: SSM Popul Health Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Fulltext

XML

PubMed Links

Search on Google