Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modern intracranial electroencephalography for epilepsy localization with combined subdural grid and depth electrodes with low and improved hemorrhagic complication rates.
Lee, Anthony T; Nichols, Noah M; Speidel, Benjamin A; Fan, Joline M; Cajigas, Iahn; Knowlton, Robert C; Chang, Edward F.
Affiliation
  • Lee AT; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Nichols NM; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Speidel BA; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Fan JM; 2Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Cajigas I; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
  • Knowlton RC; 2Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Chang EF; Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.
J Neurosurg ; 138(3): 821-827, 2023 03 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35901681
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Recent trends have moved from subdural grid electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings toward stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) depth electrodes for intracranial localization of seizures, in part because of perceived morbidity from subdural grid and strip electrodes. For invasive epilepsy monitoring, the authors describe the outcomes of a hybrid approach, whereby patients receive a combination of subdural grids, strips, and frameless stereotactic depth electrode implantations through a craniotomy. Evolution of surgical techniques was employed to reduce complications. In this study, the authors review the surgical hemorrhage and functional outcomes of this hybrid approach.

METHODS:

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent hybrid implantation from July 2012 to May 2022 at an academic epilepsy center by a single surgeon. Outcomes included hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic complications, neurological deficits, length of monitoring, and number of electrodes.

RESULTS:

A total of 137 consecutive procedures were performed; 113 procedures included both subdural and depth electrodes. The number of depth electrodes and electrode contacts did not increase the risk of hemorrhage. A mean of 1.9 ± 0.8 grid, 4.9 ± 2.1 strip, and 3.0 ± 1.9 depth electrodes were implanted, for a mean of 125.1 ± 32 electrode contacts per patient. The overall incidence of hematomas over the study period was 5.1% (7 patients) and decreased significantly with experience and the introduction of new surgical techniques. The incidence of hematomas in the last 4 years of the study period was 0% (55 patients). Symptomatic hematomas were all delayed and extra-axial. These patients required surgical evacuation, and there were no cases of hematoma recurrence. All neurological deficits related to hematomas were temporary and were resolved at hospital discharge. There were 2 nonhemorrhagic complications. The mean duration of monitoring was 7.3 ± 3.2 days. Seizures were localized in 95% of patients, with 77% of patients eventually undergoing resection and 17% undergoing responsive neurostimulation device implantation.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the authors' institutional experience, craniotomy-based subdural and depth electrode implantation was associated with low hemorrhage rates and no permanent morbidity. The rate of hemorrhage can be nearly eliminated with surgical experience and specific techniques. The decision to use subdural electrodes or SEEG should be tailored to the patient's unique pathology and surgeon experience.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Epilepsy / Electrocorticography Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Epilepsy / Electrocorticography Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Neurosurg Year: 2023 Document type: Article