Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining the Impact of Dialogic Learning on Critically Reflective Practice.
Boyd, Victoria A; Woods, Nikki N; Kumagai, Arno K; Kawamura, Anne A; Orsino, Angela; Ng, Stella L.
Affiliation
  • Boyd VA; V.A. Boyd is a PhD candidate, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, and fellow, The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0003-3602-8964 .
  • Woods NN; N.N. Woods is director, Institute for Education Research, and scientist, The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0002-2976-1108 .
  • Kumagai AK; A.K. Kumagai is vice chair for education, Department of Medicine, and F.M. Hill Chair in Humanism Education, Women's College Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0001-7088-0208 .
  • Kawamura AA; A.A. Kawamura is associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, and developmental pediatrician, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0002-5088-3011 .
  • Orsino A; A. Orsino is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, and developmental pediatrician, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ng SL; S.L. Ng is director, Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Toronto, and scientist, The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0003-1433-6851 .
Acad Med ; 97(11S): S71-S79, 2022 11 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950763
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

While research is beginning to reveal the potential of dialogue in sparking critical reflection (critically reflective ways of seeing), additional research is needed to guide the teaching of critical reflection toward enabling critically reflective practice (critically reflective ways of seeing and doing). An experimental study was conducted to investigate the impact of dialogic learning on critically reflective practice, compared to discussion-based learning. The dialogic intervention integrated the theory of Mikhail Bakhtin with the theory of critical reflection and critical disability studies.

METHOD:

In interprofessional groups of 4, medical, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology students were randomly assigned to a learning condition that used a reflective discussion or critically reflective dialogue about a pediatric patient case. All participants were then randomly assigned a clinical report for a novel pediatric patient and asked to write a hypothetical clinical letter to the child's school. Hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed to estimate the probabilities of sentences and letters being critically reflective.

RESULTS:

The probability of sentences being critically reflective was significantly higher for the dialogue condition (0.26, 95% CI [0.2, 0.33]), compared to the discussion condition (0.11, 95% CI [0.07, 0.15]). Likewise, the probability of letters being critically reflective was significantly higher for the dialogue condition (0.26, 95% CI [0.15, 0.4]), compared to the discussion condition (0.04, 95% CI [0.01, 0.16]). In both conditions, the probability of a letter being critically reflective was positively associated with the proportion of critically reflective sentences.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results demonstrate dialogic learning prepared students to enact critically reflective practice when writing mock clinical letters. Students who participated in a dialogue engaged in a collaborative process of critical reflection and subsequently applied that way of seeing in the individual act of writing a letter. This study highlights how Bakhtin's theory of dialogue can advance critical pedagogy.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Writing / Learning Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Writing / Learning Type of study: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Acad Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article