Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the efficacy and safety of tenofovir and adefovir or combined drug treatment for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bi, Zeyu; Wang, Ling; Hou, Huixin; Lu, Miao; Wang, Wei; Li, Zishuo; Liu, Chengjiang.
Affiliation
  • Bi Z; Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances, School of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Wang L; Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances, School of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Hou H; Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances, School of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Lu M; Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances, School of Environment and Health, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Wang W; Department of outpatients, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Li Z; Department of outpatients, Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Liu C; Department of Gastroenterology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ann Transl Med ; 10(18): 1016, 2022 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36267714
ABSTRACT

Background:

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects a vast population globally. A variety of drugs are available for the treatment of CHB, including tenofovir (TDF) and adefovir (ADV). However, the efficacy of monotherapy drug treatment is inconclusive, the safety and efficacy of TDF remain unclear, more data are needed to be included and combined drug treatment is considered to exhibit higher efficacy. To explore this issue, we performed a current literature review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of ADV vs. TDF, TDF vs. ADV + lamivudine (LAM); TDF vs. ADV + entecavir (ETV).

Methods:

We systematically searched China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Chinese VIP, and Wanfang Data, for relevant clinical trials since July 2015, all included studies were based on PICOS principles and evaluated independently by the reviewers in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook (Rob2.0). A meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.4.

Results:

We included a total of 32 studies, including 31 randomized controlled trials and one retrospective study involving 2,473 patients. The results revealed a low risk of bias in included studies, that the virologic response of TDF was superior to ADV (P<0.05). And TDF was also superior to ADV in Serum creatinine levels, Immunologic function, and safety profile. However, when ADV was combined with other medications, it was superior to TDF in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and Tbil level and adverse reactions, but on other indicators, TDF was superior to drug combination therapy.

Conclusions:

Results showed that TDF was superior to ADV in the parameters of ALT, hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA reduction, HBeAg-negative conversion rate, safety, and total bilirubin levels in patients with CHB. However, when ADV was combined with LAM or ETV, they often showed the same therapeutic effect as TDF in parameters such as ALT level and Tbil level and combined therapy can effectively reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions. In this study, because the sample source countries were limited, a greater number of global studies are needed in the future to verify the current findings.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Ann Transl Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 2_ODS3 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Ann Transl Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article