Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is There Utility to Requiring Spine MRI Pre-authorizations? Pre-authorizations: A Single Institution's Perspective.
Kebaish, Kareem J; Galivanche, Anoop R; Mercier, Michael R; Varthi, Arya G; Rubin, Lee E; Grauer, Jonathan N.
Affiliation
  • Kebaish KJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Galivanche AR; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Mercier MR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
  • Varthi AG; Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5 CA.
  • Rubin LE; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Grauer JN; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Clin Spine Surg ; 36(5): 186-189, 2023 06 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728293
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study of a patient undergoing treatment at a single institution's Spine Center.

OBJECTIVE:

The current study assessed the rates and eventual disposition of pre-authorizations required before spine MRIs are ordered from an academic spine center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often requires preauthorization by insurance carriers. While there are potential advantages to ensuring consistent indicators for imaging modalities, previous studies have found that such processes can add administrative burdens and barriers to care.

METHODS:

Patients from a single academic institution's spine center who were covered by commercial insurance and had a spine MRI ordered between January 2013 and December 2019 were identified. The requirement for preauthorization and eventual disposition of each of these studies was tracked. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine if commercial insurance carriers or anatomic region MRIs were associated with requiring a preauthorization. The eventual disposition of studies associated with this process was tracked.

RESULTS:

In total, 2480 MRI requests were identified, of which preauthorization was needed for 2122 (85.56%). Relative to cervical spine scans, preauthorization had greater odds of being required for thoracic (OR=2.71, P =0.003) and lumbar (OR=2.46, P <0.001) scans. Relative to a reference insurer, 4 of the 5 commercial carriers had statistically significant increased odds of requiring preauthorization (OR=1.54-10.17 P <0.050 for each).Of the imaging studies requiring preauthorization, peer to peer review was required for 204 (9.61%), and 1,747 (82.33% of all requiring preauthorization) were approved. Of 375 (17.67%) initially cancelled or denied by the preauthorization process, 290 (77.33% of those initially cancelled or denied) were completed within 3 months. In total, only 85 were not eventually approved and completed.

CONCLUSION:

Of 2480 distinct MRI orders, commercial insurers required preauthorization for 85.56%. Nonetheless, 96.57% of all scans went on to be completed within 3 months, raising questions about the costs, benefits, and overall value of this administrative process.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prior Authorization / Insurance Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Spine Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prior Authorization / Insurance Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Spine Surg Year: 2023 Document type: Article