Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individualized Out-of-Pocket Price Estimators for "Shoppable" Surgical Procedures: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of US Hospitals.
Berlin, Nicholas L; Chopra, Zoey; Bryant, Arrice; Agius, Josh; Singh, Simone R; Chhabra, Karan R; Schulz, Paul; West, Brady T; Ryan, Andrew M; Kullgren, Jeffrey T.
Affiliation
  • Berlin NL; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Chopra Z; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Bryant A; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Agius J; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Singh SR; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Chhabra KR; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Schulz P; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • West BT; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Ryan AM; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Kullgren JT; Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg Open ; 3(2): e162, 2022 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36936723
To estimate the nationwide prevalence of individualized out-of-pocket (OOP) price estimators at US hospitals, characterize patterns of inclusion of 14 specified "shoppable" surgical procedures, and determine hospital-level characteristics associated with estimators that include surgical procedures. Background: Price transparency for shoppable surgical services is a key requirement of several recent federal policies, yet the extent to which hospitals provide online OOP price estimators remains unknown. Methods: We reviewed a stratified random sample of 485 U.S. hospitals for the presence of a tool to allow patients to estimate individualized OOP expenses for healthcare services. We compared characteristics of hospitals that did and did not offer online price estimators and performed multivariable modeling to identify facility-level predictors of hospitals offering price estimator with and without surgical procedures. Results: Nearly two-thirds (66.0%) of hospitals in the final sample (95% confidence interval 61.6%-70.1%) offered an online tool for estimating OOP healthcare expenses. Approximately 58.5% of hospitals included at least one shoppable surgical procedure while around 6.6% of hospitals included all 14 surgical procedures. The most common price reported was laparoscopic cholecystectomy (55.1%), and the least common was recurrent cataract removal (20.0%). Inclusion of surgical procedures varied by total annual surgical volume and health system membership. Only 26.9% of estimators explicitly included professional fees. Conclusions: Our findings highlight an ongoing progress in price transparency, as well as key areas for improvement in future policies to help patients make more financially informed decisions about their surgical care.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Health context: 1_ASSA2030 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Ann Surg Open Year: 2022 Document type: Article