Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Associations between disordered eating behaviors and HbA1c in young people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Marks, Kevin P; Aalders, Jori; Liu, Shengxin; Broadley, Melanie; Thastum, Mikael; Jensen, Morten B; Ibfelt, Else Helene; Birkebæk, Niels H; Pouwer, Frans.
Affiliation
  • Marks KP; Aarhus University Department of Clinical Medicine - Paediatrics Aarhus Denmark.
  • Aalders J; University of Southern Denmark Department of Clinical Research Odense Denmark.
  • Liu S; Karolinska Institutet Innovations (Sweden) Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Solna Sweden.
  • Broadley M; University of Southern Denmark Department of Psychology Odense Denmark.
  • Thastum M; Aarhus University Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Aarhus Denmark.
  • Jensen MB; Aarhus University Department of Economics Aarhus Denmark.
  • Ibfelt EH; The Danish Clinical Quality Program - National Clinical Registries (RKKP) Epidemiology Copenhagen Denmark.
  • Birkebæk NH; Aarhus University Hospital Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Aarhus Denmark.
  • Pouwer F; University of Southern Denmark Psychology Odense Denmark.
Curr Diabetes Rev ; 2023 Aug 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608674
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In type 1 diabetes, disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) can adversely impact HbA1c. Diabetes-adapted DEB questionnaires assess intentional insulin omission, whereas generic questionnaires do not. Given the number of studies describing DEB-HbA1c associations published over the past decade, an updated systematic review is warranted.

OBJECTIVE:

The study aimed to examine the associations between disordered eating behaviors (DEBs) assessed by generic and diabetes-adapted questionnaires (and subscales) and HbA1c among young people (<29 years) with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS:

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases. Observational studies examining associations between DEB as assessed by questionnaires and HbA1c were included. Publication information, DEB and HbA1c characteristics, and DEB-HbA1c associations were extracted. Hedges' g was calculated for mean HbA1c differences between groups with and without DEB.

RESULTS:

The systematic search yielded 733 reports, of which 39 reports representing 35 unique studies met the inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies assessing DEB by diabetes-adapted questionnaires (n=5,795) and seven using generic questionnaires (n=2,162) provided data for meta-analysis. For diabetes-adapted questionnaires, DEB was associated with higher HbA1c (g=0.62 CI=0.52; 0.73) with a similar effect size when restricted to validated questionnaires (g=0.61; CI=0.50; 0.73). DEB was not associated with HbA1c for generic questionnaires (g=0.19; CI=-0.17; 0.55), but significantly associated with higher HbA1c for validated generic questionnaires (g=0.32; 95% CI=0.16-0.48). Participant and HbA1c collection characteristics were often inadequately described.

CONCLUSION:

Diabetes-adapted DEB questionnaires should be used in youth with type 1 diabetes because they capture intentional insulin omission and are more strongly associated with HbA1c than generic DEB questionnaires.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Curr Diabetes Rev Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Curr Diabetes Rev Year: 2023 Document type: Article