Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeated deep-inspiration breath-hold CT scans at planning underestimate the actual motion between breath-holds at treatment for lung cancer and lymphoma patients.
Hoffmann, Lone; Ehmsen, M L; Hansen, J; Hansen, R; Knap, M M; Mortensen, H R; Poulsen, P R; Ravkilde, T; Rose, H K; Schmidt, H H; Worm, E S; Møller, D S.
Affiliation
  • Hoffmann L; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: Lone.Hoffmann@aarhus.rm.dk.
  • Ehmsen ML; Danish Center for Proton Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hansen J; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Hansen R; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Knap MM; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Mortensen HR; Danish Center for Proton Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Poulsen PR; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Proton Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Ravkilde T; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Rose HK; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Schmidt HH; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Worm ES; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Møller DS; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Radiother Oncol ; 188: 109887, 2023 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37659663
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE/

OBJECTIVE:

Deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) during radiotherapy may reduce dose to the lungs and heart compared to treatment in free breathing. However, intra-fractional target shifts between several breath-holds may decrease target coverage. We compared target shifts between four DIBHs at the planning-CT session with those measured on CBCT-scans obtained pre- and post-DIBH treatments. MATERIAL/

METHODS:

Twenty-nine lung cancer and nine lymphoma patients were treated in DIBH. An external gating block was used as surrogate for the DIBH-level with a window of 2 mm. Four DIBH CT-scans were acquired one for planning (CTDIBH3) and three additional (CTDIBH1,2,4) to assess the intra-DIBH target shifts at scanning by registration to CTDIBH3. During treatment, pre-treatment (CBCTpre) and post-treatment (CBCTpost) scans were acquired. For each pair of CBCTpre/post, the target intra-DIBH shift was determined. For lung cancer, tumour (GTV-Tlung) and lymph nodes (GTV-Nlung) were analysed separately. Group mean (GM), systematic and random errors, and GM for the absolute maximum shifts (GMmax) were calculated for the shifts between CTDIBH1,2,3,4 and between CBCTpre/post.

RESULTS:

For GTV-Tlung, GMmax was larger at CBCT than CT in all directions. GMmax in cranio-caudal direction was 3.3 mm (CT)and 6.1 mm (CBCT). The standard deviations of the shifts in the left-right and cranio-caudal directions were larger at CBCT than CT. For GTV-Nlung and CTVlymphoma, no difference was found in GMmax or SD.

CONCLUSION:

Intra-DIBH shifts at planning-CT session are generally smaller than intra-DIBH shifts observed at CBCTpre/post and therefore underestimate the intra-fractional DIBH uncertainty during treatment. Lung tumours show larger intra-fractional variations than lymph nodes and lymphoma targets.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Radiother Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article