Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The immediate effects of deep transverse friction massage, high- power pain threshold ultrasound and whole body vibration on active myofascial trigger points.
Sadeghnia, Mehrdad; Shadmehr, Azadeh; Mir, Seyed Mohsen; Hadian Rasanani, Mohammad-Reza; Jalaei, Shohreh; Fereydounnia, Sara.
Affiliation
  • Sadeghnia M; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Shadmehr A; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: shadmehr@tums.ac.ir.
  • Mir SM; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hadian Rasanani MR; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Jalaei S; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Fereydounnia S; Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 36: 165-170, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949555
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The most important clinical problem in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is trigger points (TrPs). The aim of the present study was to investigate the comparison of immediate effect of deep transverse friction massage (DTFM), high-power pain threshold ultrasound (HPPTUS), and whole body vibration (WBV) on treatment of active myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

sixty six men with active TrPs of upper trapezius muscle were randomly divided into three equal groups DTFM, HPPT US, and WBV. Pain intensity based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT) and active contralateral lateral flexion range of motion (CLF ROM) of the neck were evaluated before and immediately after the interventions.

RESULTS:

The VAS, PPT and the active CLF ROM were substantially improved after intervention in all groups (P < 0.01). When the three groups were compared regarding VAS, participants in the WBV group reported significantly more reduction in pain (P < 0.01). On comparing the interventions, there were no significant differences in PPT values (P > 0.05). The CLF ROM value in HPPTUS and WBV groups have significant increase in comparison to the DTFM group.

CONCLUSION:

All three interventions can improve neck pain, PPT and ROM in participants with active TrPs in upper trapezius muscle, but due to the fact that the DTFM has more pressure on therapist fingers, and the HPPTUS technique requires proper interaction with the participants, WBV can be used as one of the effective intervention on active MTrPs of upper trapezius. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER IRCT20200518047498N1.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Trigger Points / Myofascial Pain Syndromes Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Bodyw Mov Ther Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Trigger Points / Myofascial Pain Syndromes Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Bodyw Mov Ther Year: 2023 Document type: Article