Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning Methods Based on CT Features Differentiate G1/G2 From G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Chen, Hai-Yan; Pan, Yao; Chen, Jie-Yu; Chen, Jia; Liu, Lu-Lu; Yang, Yong-Bo; Li, Kai; Ma, Qian; Shi, Lei; Yu, Ri-Sheng; Shao, Guo-Liang.
Affiliation
  • Chen HY; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Pan Y; Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, China (Y.P., R.-S.Y.).
  • Chen JY; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Chen J; Research Center for Healthcare Data Science, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang Province, China (J.C.).
  • Liu LL; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Yang YB; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Li K; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Ma Q; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Shi L; Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China (H.-Y.C., J.-Y.C., L.-L.L., Y.-B.Y., K.L., Q.M., L.S.).
  • Yu RS; Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, China (Y.P., R.-S.Y.).
  • Shao GL; Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province, China (G.-L.S.); Clinical Research Center of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310006,
Acad Radiol ; 2023 Dec 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052672
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

To identify CT features for distinguishing grade 1 (G1)/grade 2 (G2) from grade 3 (G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) using different machine learning (ML) methods. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A total of 147 patients with 155 lesions confirmed by pathology were retrospectively included. Clinical-demographic and radiological CT features was collected. The entire cohort was separated into training and validation groups at a 73 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to select features. Three ML methods, namely logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) were used to build a differential model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall curves for each ML method were generated. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy rate, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS:

G3 PNETs were more likely to present with invasive behaviors and lower enhancement than G1/G2 PNETs. The LR classifier yielded the highest AUC of 0.964 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.930, 0.972), with 95.4% accuracy rate, 95.7% sensitivity, and 92.9% specificity, followed by SVM (AUC 0.957) and KNN (AUC 0.893) in the training group. In the validation group, the SVM classier reached the highest AUC of 0.952 (95% CI 0.860, 0.981), with 91.5% accuracy rate, 97.3% sensitivity, and 70% specificity, followed by LR (AUC 0.949) and KNN (AUC 0.923).

CONCLUSIONS:

The LR and SVM classifiers had the best performance in the training group and validation group, respectively. ML method could be helpful in differentiating between G1/G2 and G3 PNETs.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Acad Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Acad Radiol Year: 2023 Document type: Article